Abstract
The author analyses the dominant discourses on the evolution of policymaking in the era of the Industrial Internet. By focusing on the topics and related narratives that derive from both societal and communicational issues in the light of the digital transformation, the author provides a sound overview on the current technology-driven evolution of policymaking and gives an outlook on future tasks that derive from related mechanisms within the political sphere. By contextualising developments associated with the Internet of Things and corresponding political outcomes in the shape of regulatory frameworks, it is outlined how the availability of data changes the way policies are made and furthermore demonstrated how influencers can guide the process of policymaking by providing data-oriented communicational services. This dialectic shift from political ideology towards evidence-based or data-driven policies accordingly would not only affect the nature of public discourse but be furthermore amplified by the Industrial Internet and associated outfits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
IDC’s Worldwide Internet of Things Spending Guide examines the Internet of Things (IoT) opportunity from a country, industry, use case and technology perspective and is published every 6 months on the IDC website http://www.idc.com.
- 3.
The European Commission's Digital Agenda forms one of the seven pillars of the Europe 2020 Strategy, which sets objectives for the growth of the European Union (EU) by 2020.
- 4.
Evidence-based policy is supposed to be a public policy informed by rigorously established objective evidence. An important aspect of evidence-based policy is the use of scientifically rigorous studies such as randomised controlled trials to identify programmes and practices capable of improving policy-relevant outcomes.
- 5.
Liquid democracy defined as “a democratic system in which most issues are decided by direct referendum. However, since no one has time for this, you can delegate your votes. Here’s the cool part; you can delegate your votes on a certain topic to one person, and then delegate your votes on another topic to someone else. And delegations are transitive; you can delegate to someone who delegates to someone else, etc, in which case your votes will flow to whoever is at the end of the line. Of course, you can un-delegate’ at any time” David Cary on January 29, 2007 https://communitywiki.org/LiquidDemocracy.
References
Abelson, D. E. (2009). Do think tanks matter?: Assessing the impact of public policy institutes. London, Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal & Kingston.
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, 54(15), 2787–2805.
Binber, B., Stohl, C., & Flanagin, A. J. (2009). Technological change and the shifting nature of political organisation. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 72–85). London & New York: Routledge.
Birkland, T. A. (2011). An introduction to the policy process, theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. London & New York: Routledge.
Cary, D. (2007). Liquid democracy. Available via Wiki. Accessed January 22, 2016, from https://communitywiki.org/LiquidDemocracy
Chandrakanth, K., Venkatesh, J., Mahesh, U., & Naganjaneyulu, K. V. (2014). Internet of things. International Journal of Innovations and Advancement in Computer Science, 3(8), 16–19.
Chien, J. (2011). The role of internet of things in China’s 12th Five Year Plan. Research Digitimes. Accessed May 11, 2016, from http://digitimes.com/news/a20111031RS400.html?chid=2#1
Daugherty, P., Banerjee, P., Negm, W., & Alter, A. E. (2015). Driving unconventional growth in the internet of things. Available via Accenture: Accessed January 22, 2016, from https://www.accenture.com/us-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/next-gen/reassembling-industry/pdf/Accenture-Driving-Unconventional-Growth-through-IIoT.pdf
Davies, H., & Nutley, S. (2002). Evidence-based policy and practice: Moving from rhetoric to reality. Discussion paper, University of St. Andrews.
Dobbs, R., Manyika, J., & Woetzel, J. (2015). The internet of things: Mapping the value beyond the hype. Available via McKinsey Global Institute. Accessed January 22, 2016, from https://www.mckinsey.de/sites/mck_files/files/unlocking_the_potential_of_the_internet_of_things_full_report.pdf
Eurobarometer. (2015). European commission. Accessed May 11, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion/#p=1&yearFrom=1973&yearTo=2015
Federal Trade Commission. (2015). FTC report on internet of things urges companies to adopt best practices to address consumer privacy and security risks. Available via FTC. Accessed January 22, 2016, from https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2015/01/ftc-report-internet-things-urges-companies-adopt-best-practices
Foucault, M. (1969). Archaeology of knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.
Gartner. (2015). Gartner says 6.4 billion connected “Things” will be in use in 2016, up 30 percent from 2015. Available via Gartner. Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3165317
Guéguen, D. (2007). European lobbying. Brussels: Europolitics.
Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 175–184.
Haller, S., Karnouskos, S., & Schroth, C. (2008). The internet of things in an enterprise context. In J. Domingue, D. Fensel, & P. Traverso (Eds.), Future internet—FIS 2008 5468, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 14–28). Berlin: Springer.
Intel Corporation. (2014). Polica framework for the internet of things (IoT). Available via Intel. Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://www.intel.de/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/corporate-information/policy-iot-framework.pdf
Koch, V., Kuge, S., Geissbauer, R., & Schrauf, S. (2015). Industry 4.0: opportunities and challenges of the industrial internet. Available via Strategy&/PwC. Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/reports/industry-4-0
Kopetz, H. (2011). Real-time system. Berlin: Springer.
London, S. (1995). Teledemocracy vs. deliberative democracy: A comparative look at two model of public talk. Journal of Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3(2), 33–35.
McGann, J. C. (2015). 2014 global go to think tank index report. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.
Mckinsey Global Institute. (2015). The Internet of things: Mapping the beyond the hyper
Modernising Government. (1999). UK government London. Accessed January 22, 2016, from https://www.wbginvestmentclimate.org/uploads/modgov.pdf
Negrine, R. (2008). The transformation of political communication: continuities and changes in media and politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
New, J., & Castro, D. (2015). Why countries need national strategies for the internet of things. Center for Data Innovation.
OFCOM. (2015). Promoting investment and innovation in the internet of things. Available via OFCOM. Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/iot/statement/IoTStatement.pdf
Rose, K., Eldridge, S., & Chapin, L. (2015). The internet of things: an overview. Understanding the issues and challenges of a more connected world. Available via the Internet Society. Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/ISOC-IoT-Overview-20151221-en.pdf
Schlaepfer, R., & Koch, M. (2015) Industry 4.0 challenges and solutions for the digital transformation and use of exponential technologies. Available via Deloitte: Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ch/Documents/manufacturing/ch-en-manufacturing-industry-4-0-24102014.pdf.
Schmidt, E., & Cohen, J. (2015). Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen on technology in 2016. Available via Time. Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://time.com/4154126/technology-essay-eric-schmidt-jared-cohen/?xid=tcoshare
Solesbury, W. (2001). Evidence based policy: Whence it came and where it’s going (Working Paper 1). ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, University of London
Street, J. (1997). Remote control? Politics, technology and “electronic democracy. European Journal of Communications, 2–1, 27–42.
Telecommunications Industry Association. (2015). Realizing the potential of the internet of things: Recommendations to policy makers. Accessed January 22, 2016, from https://www.tiaonline.org/sites/default/files/pages/TIA-White-Paper-Realizing_the_Potential_of_the_Internet_of_Things.pdf
Wedig, T. E. (2007). The internet and political organisations: force, tool or wildcard? UMI. Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/7702/umi-umd-4979.pdf?sequence=1
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
World Economic Forum. (2015). Industrial internet of things: Unleashing the potential of connected products and services. Accessed January 22, 2016, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_IndustrialInternet_Report2015.pdf
Xia, F., Yang, L. T., Wang, L., & Vinel, A. (2012). Internet of things. International Journal of Communications Systems, 25, 1101–1102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Porcaro, G. (2017). Policy and Politics in the Era of the Industrial Internet: How the Digital Transformation Will Change the Political Arena. In: Klewes, J., Popp, D., Rost-Hein, M. (eds) Out-thinking Organizational Communications. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41845-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41845-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41844-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41845-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)