Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) provide the highest standard of evidence available for assessing treatment efficacy. Causal inferences are enabled and effects may be directly attributed to a treatment. The nature of infectious disease presents challenges to the design, conduct, and analysis of a trial for a new drug or therapy. Many of these challenges are statistical in nature and can be addressed with modern methods for planning and analyzing RCT data. In this chapter, some of these challenges are described and reviewed. Modern statistical modeling methods for analysis of correlated data are covered. Some challenges with sample size determination are outlined and updated methods for data monitoring, interim, and subgroup analyses detailed. Also, discernment is made between multisite and cluster randomized trials. Recommendations for best practices are included.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Altman, D.G.: The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ 308, 283–4 (1994)
Berben, L., Sereika, S.M., Engberg, S.: Effect size estimation: methods and examples. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 49, 1039–1047 (2012)
Cox, D.R.: Planning of Experiments. Wiley, New York (1958)
Cox, E., Borio, L., Temple, R.: Evaluating Ebola therapies-the case for RCTs. N. Engl. J. Med. 371(25), 2350 (2014)
Diez-Roux, A.: Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am. J. Publ. Health 88, 816–822 (1998)
Fleiss, J.L.: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Wiley, New York (1986)
Friedman, L.M., Furberg, C.D., DeMets, D.L.: Fundamentals of Clinical Trials, 4th edn. Springer, New York (2010)
Gardiner, J.C., Luo, Z., Roman, L.A.: Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: what are the differences? Stat. Med. 28, 221Y239 (2009)
Hayat, M.J.: Understanding sample size determination in nursing research. West. J. Nurs. Res. 35(7), 943–956 (2013)
Hayat, M.J., Hedlin, H.: Modern statistical modeling approaches for analyzing repeated-measures data. Nurs. Res. 61(3), 188–194 (2012)
Hayes, R.J., Bennett, S.: Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. Int. J. Epidemiol. 28, 319–326 (1999)
Henao-Restrepo, A.M., Longini, I.M., Egger, M., Dean, N.E., Edmunds, W.J., Camacho, A., Carroll, M.W., Doumbia, M., Draguez, B., Duraffour, S., Enwere, G., Grais, R., Gunther, S., Hossmann, S., Kondé, M.K., Kone, S., Kuisma, E., Levine, M.M., Mandal, S., Norheim, G., Riveros, X., Soumah, A., Trelle, S., Vicari, A.S., Watson, C.H., Kéïta, S., Kieny, M.P., Røttingen, J.A.: Efficacy and effectiveness of an rvsv-vectored vaccine expressing ebola surface glycoprotein: interim results from the guinea ring vaccination cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 386(9996), 857–866 (2015)
Hoenig, J.M., Heisey, D.M.: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Am. Stat. 55, 19–24 (2001)
Kairalla, J.A., Coffey, C.S., Thomann, M.A., Muller, K.E.: Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunities. Trials 23(13), 145 (2012)
Koch, G.G., Schwartz, T.: An overview of statistical planning to address subgroups in confirmatory clinical trials. J. Biopharm. Stat. 72–93 (2014)
MacArthur, R.D., Jackson, G.G.: An evaluation of the use of statistical methodology. J. Infect. Dis. 149(3), 349–354 (1984)
Maxwell, S.E.: Ethics and Sample Size Planning. In: Panter, A.T., Sterba, S.K. (eds.) Handbook of Ethics in Quantitative Methodology, pp. 159–183. Routledge, New York (2011)
Mehta, C.R., Pocock, S.J.: Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: a practical guide with examples. Stat. Med. 30(28), 3267–3284 (2011)
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group: CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trial. BMJ 340, c869 (2010)
Olsen, C.H.: Review of the use of statistics in Infection and Immunity. Infect. Immun. 71, 6689–6692 (2003)
Pearson, K.: The Grammar of Science. Walter Scott, London (1892)
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A.: Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Stata Press, College Station (2005)
Richardson, B.A., Overbaugh, J.: Basic statistical considerations in virological experiments. J. Virol. 79(2), 669–676 (2005)
Rothwell, P.M.: Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet 365(9454), 176–86 (2005)
Schor, S., Karten, I.: Statistical evaluation of medical journal manuscripts. JAMA 195, 1123–8 (1966)
Schulz, K.F., Grimes, D.A.: Multiplicity in randomised trials II: subgroup and interim analyses. Lancet 365(9471), 1657–61 (2005)
Twisk, J.W., Smidt, N., de Vente, W.: Applied analysis of recurrent events: a practical overview. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 59, 706Y710 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hayat, M.J. (2016). Statistical Considerations in Infectious Disease Randomized Controlled Trials. In: Chowell, G., Hyman, J. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Modeling for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40413-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40413-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40411-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40413-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)