Skip to main content

Creativity in Doubt: Toward Understanding What Drives Creativity in Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

What propels creativity in learning? In this chapter, we discuss a long-standing—yet often overlooked—form of reasoning that helps address this question. That form of reasoning is called abductive reasoning (introduced by the early American Pragmatist, Charles Sanders Peirce). Abductive reasoning represents a special form of creative reasoning that is triggered by states of genuine doubt. Genuine doubt occurs whenever our everyday habits and beliefs fall short in making sense of a situation. In the context of learning, genuine doubt occurs anytime a learner is unable to inductively or deductively reason through an academic task or situation. As we will discuss, these states of doubt represent opportunities for creative learning. Specifically, our aim in this chapter is to demonstrate, by way of example, how abduction and creativity work together in every day learning. We will also discuss how understanding this link will help clarify efforts aimed at supporting creativity in the classroom, expand current conceptions of creativity, and provide directions for research on creativity in educational settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arici, A. D., Schreiber, J. B., Sugioka, H., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998, April). Abductive reasoning and the problem solving on the World Wide Web. A paper presented at the Annual American Education Research Association, San Diego California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29, 265–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2016a). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15, 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2016b). Learning as a creative act. To appear in T. Kettler (Ed.), Modern curriculum for gifted and advanced Learners. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: All roads lead to creativity or you can’t get there from here? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Bear (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 316–332). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burks, A. W. (1946). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philosophy of Science, 13, 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. (2014). The Chinese room argument. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/chinese-room/.

  • Cunningham, D. J., Arici, A., Schreiber, J., & Lee, K. (2002). Navigating the World Wide Web: The role of abductive reasoning. International Journal of Applied Semiotics, 3(2), 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity and learning. In D. B. Lindsley & A. A. Lumsdaine (Eds.), Brain function (Brain function and learning, Vol. IV). Los Angles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, N. (1987). Toward a Peircean semiotic theory of learning. The American Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, J. R., & Josephson, S. G. (Eds.). (1996). Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharies, D. A. (1985). Charles S. Peirce and the linguistic sign (Vol. 9). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Grossman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativ- ity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, A. (1996). The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B. (2001, April). Problem based learning and Peircean reasoning: Barry a case study. Paper presented at the National Consortium for Instruction and Cognition Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, G., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996, October). Modeling the six modes of Peircean abduction for educational purposes. In Annual meeting of the Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. M. E. Sharpe, Inc. (Trans.). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97. (Original work published 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald A. Beghetto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beghetto, R.A., Schreiber, J.B. (2017). Creativity in Doubt: Toward Understanding What Drives Creativity in Learning. In: Leikin, R., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creativity and Giftedness. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38838-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38840-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics