Skip to main content

Experimental Determination of Mixed-Mode Fracture Toughness for Rigid Polyurethane Foams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Fracture at all Scales

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Cellular materials represent a new class of materials and main parameters that characterize the cellular structure are relative density, cells shapes (open or closed cells), wall thickness and cell diameter/length. Polyurethane foams crush in compression and have a brittle fracture in tension, so their failure could be evaluated based on Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics. Fracture toughness in mixed mode loading is of particular interest because foam cracking weakens the structure’s capacity for carrying loads. The mixed mode fracture of three closed-cell rigid PUR foams with densities: 100, 145 and 300 kg/m3 were experimentally investigated. Fracture tests were performed with a loading speed of 2 mm/min at room temperature, using both Asymmetric Semi-Circular Bend (ASCB) specimens and Single Edge Cracked (SEC) specimen and a mixed mode loading device. In this respect a numerical determination of Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) solutions for ASCB specimen were performed using Abaqus software. The advantages of these specimens are the simple geometry and the ability to produce full range of mixed modes, from pure mode I to pure mode II, only by changing the support span or loading direction. Fracture criteria based on the cellular topology and tensile strength of the solid material is assessed. It was found that the density of foams is the most important parameter influencing the fracture toughness. The crack propagation angles and the crack path were also determined experimentally and numerically. The foams cells morphology and pore distribution were studied before testing through scanning electron microscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Apostol DA, Constantinescu DM, Marsavina L, Linul E (2015) Mixed-mode testing for an asymmetric four-point bending configuration of polyurethane foams. Appl Mech Mater 760:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ASTM D 1622-08 Standard test method for apparent density of rigid cellular plastics

    Google Scholar 

  3. ASTM D 5045-99 Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ayatollahi MR, Aliha MRM, Aghafi H (2011) An improved semi-circular bend specimen for investigating mixed mode brittle fracture. Eng Fract Mech 78:110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Birsan M, Sadowski T, Marsavina L, Linul E, Pietras D (2013) Mechanical behavior of sandwich composite beams made of foams and functionally graded materials. Int J Solids Struct 50:519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burman M (1998) Fatigue crack initiation and propagation in sandwich structures, Report No. 98-29, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen JY, Huang Y, Ortiz M (1998) Fracture analysis of cellular materials: a strain gradient model. J Mech Phys Solids 46(5):789–828

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Danielsson M (1996) Toughened rigid foam core material for use in sandwich construction. Cell Polym 15:417–435

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erdogan F, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Eng 85:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids, structure and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hallstrom S, Grenestedt JL (1997) Mixed mode fracture of cracks and wedge shaped notches in expanded PVC foam. Int J Fract 88:343–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain MA, Pu SL, Underwood J (1974) Strain energy release rate for a crack under combined mode I and mode II. In: Paris PC, Irwin GR (eds) Fracture analysis. ASTM STP560, Philadelphia, pp 2–28

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kabir ME, Saha MC, Jeelani S (2006) Tensile and fracture behavior of polymer foams. Mater Sci Eng A Struct 429:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Linul E, Marsavina L (2011) Prediction of fracture toughness for open cell polyurethane foams by finite element micromechanical analysis. Iran Polym J 20(9):736–746

    Google Scholar 

  15. Linul E, Marsavina L (2015) Assesment of sandwich beams with rigid polyurethane foam core using failure-mode maps. Proc Rom Acad A 16(4):522–530

    Google Scholar 

  16. Linul E, Marsavina L, Sadowski T, Kneć M (2012) Size Effect on fracture toughness of rigid polyurethane foams. Solid State Phenom 188:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Linul E, Voiconi T, Marsavina L, Sadowski T (2013) Study of factors influencing the mechanical properties of polyurethane foams under dynamic compression. J Phys Conf 451:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Linul E, Voiconi T, Marsavina L (2014) Determination of mixed mode fracture toughness of PUR foams. Struct Integr Life 14(2):87–92

    Google Scholar 

  19. Linul E, Serban DA, Voiconi T, Marsavina L, Sadowski T (2014) Energy-absorption and efficiency diagrams of rigid PUR foams. Key Eng Mater 601:246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marsavina L, Linul E (2010) Fracture toughness of polyurethane foams. Experiments versus micromechanical models. In: Proceedings of ECF18, Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marsavina L, Linul E, Voiconi T, Sadowski T (2013) A comparison between dynamic and static fracture toughness of polyurethane foams. Polym Test 32:673–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marsavina L, Constantinescu DM, Linul E, Apostol DA, Voiconi T, Sadowski T (2014) Refinements on fracture toughness of PUR foams. Eng Fract Mech 129:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marsavina L, Constantinescu DM, Linul E, Voiconi T, Apostol DA, Sadowski T (2014) Evaluation of mixed mode fracture for PUR foams. Proc Mater Sci 3:1342–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marsavina L, Constantinescu DM, Linul E, Voiconi T, Apostol DA (2015) Shear and mode II fracture of PUR foams. Eng Fail Anal 58:465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marsavina L, Linul E, Voiconi T, Constantinescu DM, Apostol DA (2015) On the crack path under mixed mode loading on PUR foams. Fract Struct Integr 34:444–453

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mills NJ (2007) Polymer foams handbook: engineering and biomechanics applications and design guide. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  27. Noury PM, Shenoi RA, Sinclair I (1998) On mixed-mode fracture of PVC foam. Int J Fract 92:131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Negru R, Marsavina L, Voiconi T, Linul E, Filipescu H, Belciu G (2015) Application of TCD for brittle fracture of notched PUR materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech 80:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Poapongsakorn P, Carlsson LA (2013) Fracture toughness of closed-cell PVC foams: effects of loading configuration and cell size. Compos Struct 102:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Richard HA (1985) Bruchvorhersagen bei uberlagreter normal- und schubbeanspruchung von rissen. VDI, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  31. Richard HA, Fulland M, Sander M (2005) Theoretical crack path prediction. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 28:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sih GC (1974) Strain-energy-density factor applied to mixed mode crack problems. Int J Fract 10:305–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Șerban D, Linul E, Voiconi T, Marsavina L, Modler N (2015) Numerical evaluation of two-dimensional micromechanical structures of anisotropic cellular materials: case study for polyurethane rigid foams. Iran Polym J 24:515–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Viana GM, Carlsson LA (2002) Mechanical properties and fracture characterization of cross-linked PVC foams. J Sandw Struct Mater 4:91–113

    Google Scholar 

  35. Voiconi T, Negru R, Linul E, Marsavina L, Filipescu H (2014) The notch effect on fracture of polyurethane materials. Fract Struct Integr 30:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  36. Voiconi T, Linul E, Marsavina L, Sadowski T, Knec M (2014) Determination of flexural properties of rigid PUR foams using digital image correlation. Solid State Phenom 216:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the strategic grant POSDRU/159/1.5/S/137070 (2014) of the Ministry of National Education, Romania, co-financed by the European Social Fund—Investing in People, within the Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007–2013.

Experimental tests were performed in the framework of the CNCS-UEFISCDI Grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0456, Contract Number 172/2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Linul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Linul, E., Marsavina, L. (2017). Experimental Determination of Mixed-Mode Fracture Toughness for Rigid Polyurethane Foams. In: Pluvinage, G., Milovic, L. (eds) Fracture at all Scales. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32634-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32634-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32633-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32634-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics