Skip to main content

Vacuum Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction

Part of the book series: Contemporary Endocrinology ((COE))

Abstract

Since receiving FDA approval in 1982, vacuum erection devices (VEDs) have benefitted millions of men suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED). Vacuum therapy has since been overshadowed by advances in pharmacologic and surgical therapies for ED; however, there has been a recent resurgence in the popularity of the VED. This is in large part due to its developing role in post-prostatectomy penile rehabilitation. As a treatment for erectile dysfunction, vacuum therapy remains notable as a noninvasive, nonpharmacologic, safe, cost-effective, and efficacious treatment option. This chapter will review the evolution of vacuum therapy as well as its mechanism of action, efficacy, safety profile, and expanding applications beyond the traditional realm of ED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yuan J, Hoang AN, Romero CA, Lin H, Dai Y, Wang R. Vacuum therapy in erectile dysfunction—science and clinical evidence. Int J Impot Res. 2010;22(4):211–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brison D, Seftel A, Sadeghi-Nejad H. The resurgence of the vacuum erection device (VED) for treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2013;10(4):1124–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. King J. Contemporary treatment of ED. Indianapolis: Streight and Douglass; 1874. p. 384.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lederer O. Specification of letter patent. US patent No. 1,225,341. Accessed 8 May 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sell FW. Erector. US patent No. 2,874,698. Accessed 24 Feb 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson FM. Apparatus for obtaining artificial erection. US patent No. 3,744,486. Accessed 10 July 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geddings D Osbon S, Osbon GD. Erection aid device. US Patent Office. Accessed 29 Mar 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lue TF. Editorial comment on clinical experience of vacuum tumescence enhancement therapy for impotence. J Urol. 1991;145:1112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Montague DK, Barada JH, Belker AM, Levine LA, Nadig PW, Roehrborn CG, et al. Clinical guidelines panel on erectile dysfunction: summary report on the treatment of organic erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 1996;156(6):2007–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li E, Hou J, Li D, Wang Y, He J, Zhang J. The mechanism of vacuum constriction devices in penile erection: the NO/cGMP signaling pathway? Med Hypotheses. 2010;75(5):422–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nadig PW, Catesby Ware J, Blumoff R. Noninvasive device to produce and maintain an erection-like state. Urology. 1986;27(2):126–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Witherington R. Vacuum constriction device for management of erectile impotence. J Urol. 1989;141(2):320–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sidi AA, Becher EF, Zhang G, Lewis JH. Patient acceptance of and satisfaction with an external negative pressure device for impotence. J Urol. 1990;144(5):1154–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cookson MS, Nadig PW. Long term results with vacuum constriction device. J Urol. 1993;149(2):290–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Segenreich E, Shmuely J, Israilov S, Raz D, Servadio C. Treatment of erectile dysfunction with vacuum constriction device. Harafuah. 1993;124(6):326–8. 392.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Turner LA, Althof SE, Levine SB, Bodner DR, Kursh ED, Resnick MI. External vacuum devices in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a one-year study of sexual and psychosocial impact. J Sex Marital Ther. 1991;17(2):81–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bosshardt RJ, Farwerk R, Sikora R, Sohn M, Jakse G. Objective measurement of the effectiveness, therapeutic success and dynamic mechanisms of the vacuum device. Br J Urol. 1995;75(6):786–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kessler WO. Nocturnal penile tumescence. Urol Clin North Am. 1988;15(1):81–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vrijhof H, Delaere K. Vacuum constriction devices in erectile dysfunction: acceptance and effectiveness in patients with impotence of organic or mixed aetiology. BJU Int. 1994;74(1):102–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dutta TC, Eid JF. Vacuum constriction devices for erectile dysfunction: a long-term, prospective study of patients with mild, moderate, and severe dysfunction. Urology. 1999;54(5):891–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meinhardt W, Lycklama a Nijeholt AA, Kropman RF, Zwartendijk J. The negative pressure device for erectile disorders: when does it fail? J Urol. 1993;149(5 Pt 2):1285–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mulhall JP. Intracavernosal injection therapy: a practical guide. Tech Urol. 1997;3(3):129–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Purvis K, Egdetveit I, Christiansen E. Intracavernosal therapy for erectile failure—impact of treatment and reasons for drop-out and dissatisfaction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(5):287–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sundaram CP, Thomas W, Pryor LE, Sidi AA, Billups K, Pryor JL. Long-term follow-up of patients receiving injection therapy for erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49(6):932–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Avicenna H. The canon of medicine. 1556 ed.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rollo J. Cases of diabetes mellitus. London: C. Dilly; 1798.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thorve VS, Kshirsagar AD, Vyawahare NS, Joshi VS, Ingale KG, Mohite RJ. Diabetes-induced erectile dysfunction: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. J Diabetes Complications. 2011;25(2):129–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis RW. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(2):209–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Price DE, Cooksey G, Jehu D, Bentley S, Hearnshaw JR, Osborn DE. The management of impotence in diabetic men by vacuum tumescence therapy. Diabetic Med. 1991;8(10):964–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arauz-Pacheco C, Basco M, Ramirex LC, Pita JM, Pruenda L, Raskin P. Treatment of diabetic impotence with a vacuum device: efficacy and effects on psychological status. Am J Med Sci. 1992;303(5):281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bodansky HJ. Treatment of male erectile dysfunction using the active vacuum assist device. Diabetic Med. 1994;11(4):410–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Israilov S, Shmuely J, Niv E, Engelstein D, Livne P, Boniel J. Evaluation of a progressive treatment program for erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17(5):431–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brown DJ, Hill ST, Baker HWG. Male fertility and sexual function after spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res. 2006;152:427–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Linsenmeyer TA. Treatment of erectile dysfunction following spinal cord injury. Curr Urol Rep. 2009;10(6):478–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lloyd EE, Toth LL, Perkash I. Vacuum tumescence: an option for spinal cord injured males with erectile dysfunction. SCI Nurs. 1989;6(2):25–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zasler ND, Katz PG. Synergist erection system in the management of impotence secondary to spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(9):712–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Heller L, Keren O, Aloni R, Davidoff G. An open trial of vacuum penile tumescence: constriction therapy for neurological impotence. Paraplegia. 1992;30(8):550–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Denil J, Ohl DA, Smythe C. Vacuum erection device in spinal cord injured men: patient and partner satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(8):750–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chancellor MB, Hills E, Schwarts M, Hirsch IH. Treatment of erectile dysfunction in males with spinal cord injury using the vacuum constriction device (VCD). J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1991;14:73.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Watanabe T, Chancellor MB, Rivas DA, Hirsch IH, Bennett CJ, Finocchiaro MV, et al. Epidemiology of current treatment for sexual dysfunction in spinal cord injured men in the USA model spinal cord injury centers. J Spinal Cord Med. 1996;19(3):186–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moemen MN, Fahmy I, AbdelAal M, Kamel I, Mansour M, Arafa MM. Erectile dysfunction in spinal cord-injured men: different treatment options. Int J Impot Res. 2008;20(2):181–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rivas DA, Chancellor MB. Complications associated with the use of vacuum constriction devices for erectile dysfunction in the spinal cord injured population. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1994;17(3):136–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen J, Sofer M, Kaver I, Matzkin H, Greenstein A. Concomitant use of sildenafil and a vacuum entrapment device for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2004;171(1):292–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Canguven O, Bailen J, Fredriksson W, Bock D, Burnett AL. Combination of vacuum erection device and PDE5 inhibitors as salvage therapy in PDE5 inhibitor nonresponders with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2009;6(9):2561–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Engel JD, Sutherland DE, Williams SB, Wagner KR. Changes in penile length after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25(1):65–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Basal S, Wambi C, Acikel C, Gupta M, Badani K. Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function. BJU Int. 2013;111(4):658–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. John H, Lehmann K, Hauri D. Intraurethral prostaglandin improves quality of vacuum erection therapy. Eur Urol. 1996;29(2):224–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cecchi M, Sepich CA, Felipetto R, Vigano L, Pagni G, Minervini R, et al. Vacuum constriction device and topical minoxidil for management of impotence. Arch Esp Urol. 1995;48(10):1058–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bellorofonte C, Dell'Acqua S, Mastromarino G, Tombolini P, Ruoppolo M, Zaatar C. External devices: for which patients? Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1995;67(5):293–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Soderdahl DW, Petroski RA, Mode D, Schwartz BF, Thrasher JB. The use of an external vacuum device to augment a penile prosthesis. Tech Urol. 1996;3(2):100–2.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Korenman SG, Viosca SP. Use of a vacuum tumescence device in the management of impotence in men with a history of penile implant or severe pelvic disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(1):61–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wylie KR, Jones RH, Walters S. The potential benefit of vacuum devices augmenting psychosexual therapy for erectile dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29(3):227–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tal R, Alphs HH, Krebs P, Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta‐analysis. J Sex Med. 2009;6(9):2538–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Alemozaffar M, Regan MM, Cooperberg MR, Wei JT, Michalski JM, Sandler HM, et al. Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2011;306(11):1205–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Burnett AL. Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2648–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Meyer JP, Gillatt DA, Lockyer R, Macdonagh R. The effect of erectile dysfunction on the quality of life of men after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2003;92(9):929–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Penson DF, Feng Z, Kuniyuki A, McClerran D, Albertsen PC, Deapen D, et al. General quality of life 2 years following treatment for prostate cancer: what influences outcomes? Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):1147–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Leungwattanakij S, Bivalacqua TJ, Usta MF, Yang D-Y, Hyun J-S, Champion HC, et al. Cavernous neurotomy causes hypoxia and fibrosis in rat corpus cavernosum. J Androl. 2003;24(2):239–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mulhall JP, Bella AJ, Briganti A, McCullough A, Brock G. Erectile function rehabilitation in the radical prostatectomy patient. J Sex Med. 2010;7(4 Pt 2):1687–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kim JH, Lee SW. Current status of penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(2):99–108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Fraiman M, Lepor H, McCullough A. Changes in penile morphometrics in men with erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Mol Urol. 1999;3(2):109–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gontero P, Galzerano M, Bartoletti R, Magnani C, Tizzani A, Frea B, et al. New insights into the pathogenesis of penile shortening after radical prostatectomy and the role of postoperative sexual function. J Urol. 2007;178(2):602–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Munding MD, Wessells HB, Dalkin BL. Pilot study of changes in stretched penile length 3 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2001;58(4):567–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Vasdev N, Hoyland K, Adshead JM. Is it still clinically and economically viable in the UK to prescribe vacuum erection devices for patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy? BJU Int. 2014;113(3):356–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tal R, Teloken P, Mulhall JP. Erectile function rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: practice patterns among AUA members. J Sex Med. 2011;8(8):2370–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kirby M. Best practice guidelines on the use of vacuum constriction devices for erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Br Soc Sexual Med. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Broderick GA, McGahan JP, Stone AR, White RD. The hemodynamics of vacuum constriction erections: assessment by color Doppler ultrasound. J Urol. 1992;147(1):57–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Raina R, Agarwal A, Ausmundson S, Lakin M, Nandipati KC, Montague DK, et al. Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18(1):77–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Dalkin BL, Christopher BA. Preservation of penile length after radical prostatectomy: early intervention with a vacuum erection device. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19(5):501–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Köhler TS, Pedro R, Hendlin K, Utz W, Ugarte R, Reddy P, et al. A pilot study on the early use of the vacuum erection device after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007;100(4):858–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fode M, Ohl DA, Ralph D, Sønksen J. Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: what the evidence really says. BJU Int. 2013;112(7):998–1008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Baniel J, Israilov S, Segenreich E, Livne PM. Comparative evaluation of treatments for erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;88(1):58–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gontero P, Fontana F, Zitella A, Montorsi F, Frea B. A prospective evaluation of efficacy and compliance with a multistep treatment approach for erectile dysfunction in patients after non‐nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005;95(3):359–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Aghamir MK, Hosseini R, Alizadeh F. A vacuum device for penile elongation: fact or fiction? BJU Int. 2006;97(4):777–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Moskovic DJ, Pastuszak AW, Lipshultz LI, Khera M. Revision of penile prosthesis surgery after use of penile traction therapy to increase erect penile length: case report and review of the literature. J Sex Med. 2011;8(2):607–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Sellers T, Dineen M, Wilson SK. Vacuum protocol and cylinders that lengthen allow implantation of longer inflatable prostheses reducing complaints of shortened penile length. J Urol. 2009;181(4):449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sellers T, Dineen M, Salem EA, Wilson SK. Vacuum preparation, optimization of cylinder length and postoperative daily inflation reduces complaints of shortened penile length following implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis. ASM. 2013;2013(01):14–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Moul JW, McLeod DG. Negative pressure devices in the explanted penile prosthesis population. J Urol. 1989;142(3):729–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Chung E, Brock G. Penile traction therapy and Peyronie’s disease: a state of art review of the current literature. Ther Adv Urol. 2013;5(1):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Raheem AA, Garaffa G, Raheem TA, Dixon M, Kayes A, Christopher N, et al. The role of vacuum pump therapy to mechanically straighten the penis in Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2010;106(8):1178–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Derouet H, Caspari D, Rohde V, Rommel G, Ziegler M. Treatment of erectile dysfunction with external vacuum devices. Andrologia. 1999;31(S1):89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Althof SE, Turner LA, Levine SB, Bodner D, Kursh ED, Resnick MI. Through the eyes of women: the sexual and psychological responses of women to their partner’s treatment with self-injection or external vacuum therapy. J Urol. 1992;147(4):1024–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Levine LA, Dimitriou RJ. Vacuum constriction and external erection devices in erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(2):335–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Oakley N, Moore KT. Vacuum devices in erectile dysfunction: indications and efficacy. Br J Urol. 1998;82(5):673–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Lewis RW, Witherington R. External vacuum therapy for erectile dysfunction: use and results. World J Urol. 1997;15(1):78–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Hakim LS, Munarriz RM, Kulaksizoglu H, Nehra A, Udelson D, Goldstein I. Vacuum erection associated impotence and Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1996;155(2):534–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ganem JP, Lucey DT, Janosko EO, Carson CC. Unusual complications of the vacuum erection device. Urology. 1998;51(4):627–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Kim 3rd JH, Carson CC. Development of Peyronie’s disease with the use of a vacuum constriction device. J Urol. 1993;149(5 Pt 2):1314–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Theiss M, Hofmockel G, Frohmuller HGW. Fournier’s gangrene in a patient with erectile dysfunction following use of a mechanical erection aid device. J Urol. 1995;153(6):1921–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Limoge JP, Olins E, Henderson D, Donatucci CF. Minimally invasive therapies in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in anticoagulated cases: a study of satisfaction and safety. J Urol. 1996;155(4):1276–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Bratton RL, Cassidy HD. Vacuum erection device use in elderly men: a possible severe complication. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15(6):501–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Billups KL. The role of mechanical devices in treating female sexual dysfunction and enhancing the female sexual response. World J Urol. 2002;20(2):137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Blackard CE, Borkon WD, Lima JS, Nelson J. Use of vacuum tumescence device for impotence secondary to venous leakage. Urology. 1993;41(3):225–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Baltaci S, Aydos K, Kosar A, Anafarta K. Treating erectile dysfunction with a vacuum tumescence device: a retrospective analysis of acceptance and satisfaction. BJU Int. 1995;76(6):757–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Kolettis PN, Lakin MM, Montague DK, Ingleright BJ, Ausmundson S. Efficacy of the vacuum constriction device in patients with corporeal venous occlusive dysfunction. Urology. 1995;46(6):856–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason C. Hedges MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hecht, S.L., Hedges, J.C. (2016). Vacuum Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction. In: Köhler, T., McVary, K. (eds) Contemporary Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction. Contemporary Endocrinology. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31587-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31587-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31585-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31587-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics