Skip to main content

Green Technology Choice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 120k Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Supply Chain Management ((SSSCM,volume 4))

Abstract

In late 2000s, Wells Fargo, a large US bank, asked themselves a profoundly important, yet very simple, question: “If our clients find it profitable to borrow money from us to install solar panels on their roofs, shouldn’t we find it profitable too?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aflaki S, Netessine S (2011) Strategic investment in renewable energy sources. Working paper. INSEAD, Fontainebleau

    Google Scholar 

  • Alev I, Agrawal V, Atasu A (2014) Extended producer responsibility, secondary markets, and export restrictions. Working paper. Georgia Tech, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizamir S, de Vericourt F, Sun P (2014) Efficient feed-in-tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Working paper. Yale University, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Hansen EN (2004) Determining consumer preferences for ecolabeled forest products: an experimental approach. J Forest 102(4):28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiker MH (2005) Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J Int Econ 65:421–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boukherroub T, Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (2017) Carbon footprinting in supply chains. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown TJ, Dacin PA (1997) The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Market 61(1):68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Foot Printing (2012) Report by Carbon Trust. https://www.carbontrust.com/media/44869/j7912_ctv043_carbon_footprinting_aw_interactive.pdf

  • Carraro C, Soubeyran A (1996) Environmental policy and the choice of production technology. In: Carraro C, Katsoulacos Y, Zepapadeas A (eds) Environmental policy and market structure. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 151–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chemama J, Cohen MC, Lobel R, Perakis G (2014) Consumer subsidies with a strategic supplier: commitment vs flexibility Working paper. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Lee HL (2014) Mitigate supplier responsibility risk in emerging economies: an ethical sourcing framework. Working paper. Duke University, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MC, Lobel R, Perakis G (2014) The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Management Science (Forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maria C, van der Werf E (2008) Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change. Environ Res Econ 39:55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake DF (2012) Carbon tariffs: effects in settings with technology choice and foreign comparative advantage. Working paper. Harvard Business School, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake DF, Kleindorfer PR, Van Wassenhove LN (2014) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott J, Vincent J (2014) An analysis of willingness to pay and reasons for purchasing certified forest products. Master’s thesis. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder S, Rutherford TF (1993) Unilateral CO2 reductions and carbon leakage: the consequences of international trade in oil and basic materials. J Environ Econ Manage 25:162–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo R, Lee HL, Swinney R (2015) Responsible sourcing in supply chains. Working paper. Duke University, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu S, Souza GC, Ferguson ME, Wang W (2015) Capacity investment in renewable energy technology with supply intermittency. Manuf Serv Oper Manage (Forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Islegen O, Reichelstein S (2011) Carbon capture by fossil fuel power plants: an economic analysis. Manage Sci 57(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izhutov PA, Lee HL (2014) Dynamics of a responsible business relationship. Working paper. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jager-Waldau A (2012) PV status report 2012. European Commission report EUR 25749 EN

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-H (2015) Time to come clean? Disclosure and inspection policies for green production. Oper Res (Forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer PR, Neboian A, Roset A, Spinler S (2012) Fleet renewal with electric vehicles at La Poste. Interfaces 42(5):465–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok AG, Shang K, Yucel S (2014) Impact of electricity pricing policy on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Working paper. Duke University, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Krass D, Nedorezov T, Ovchinnikov A (2013) Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Product Oper Manage 22(5):1035–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaro-Forleo G (2001) Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products”. J Consum Market 18(6):503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Rammohan SV (2017) Improving social and environmental performance in global supply chains. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel E, Perakis G (2011) Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. Working paper. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov A (2008) c-Energy’s Red Hill plant: meeting the SO2 challenge, UVA-QA-0726. Darden Business, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov A, Hvaleva A (2012) Wells fargo: solar energy for Los Angeles branches” (A) and (B), UVA-QA-800, 801. Darden Business, Charlottesville, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2014) Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility. Working paper. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz G, Ovchinnikov A (2015) Coordinating pricing and supply of public interest goods using government rebates and subsidies. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 62(1):65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz G, Ovchinnikov AS, Elias A (2014) Chevy Volt: pricing and capacity decisions in response to government incentives for the electric vehicle industry. Darden Business, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JA (1996) Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. J Bus Res 36(3):217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Market Res 38(2):225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straughan RD, Roberts JA (1999) Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. J Consum Market 16(6):558–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunar N, Plambeck EL (2014) Allocating emissions among co-products: implications for procurement, offsetting & border adjustment. Working paper. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weele A, van Tubergen K (2017) Responsible purchasing: moving from compliance to value creation in supplier relationships. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Ferguson ME, Hu S, Souza GC (2013) Dynamic capacity investment with two competing technologies. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 15(4):616–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu OQ, Kapuschinski R (2013) Curtailing intermittent generation in electrical systems. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 15(4):578–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Scheller-Wolf A, Secomandi N, Smith S (2014a) Electricity trading and negative prices: storage vs. disposal. Working paper. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Scheller-Wolf A, Secomandi N, Smith S (2014b) Managing wind-based electricity generation in the presence of storage and transmission capacity. Working paper. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Ovchinnikov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Yann Bouchery, Charles J. Corbett, Jan C. Fransoo, and Tarkan Tan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ovchinnikov, A. (2017). Green Technology Choice. In: Bouchery, Y., Corbett, C., Fransoo, J., Tan, T. (eds) Sustainable Supply Chains. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29791-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics