Abstract
In late 2000s, Wells Fargo, a large US bank, asked themselves a profoundly important, yet very simple, question: “If our clients find it profitable to borrow money from us to install solar panels on their roofs, shouldn’t we find it profitable too?”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aflaki S, Netessine S (2011) Strategic investment in renewable energy sources. Working paper. INSEAD, Fontainebleau
Alev I, Agrawal V, Atasu A (2014) Extended producer responsibility, secondary markets, and export restrictions. Working paper. Georgia Tech, Atlanta
Alizamir S, de Vericourt F, Sun P (2014) Efficient feed-in-tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Working paper. Yale University, New Haven
Anderson RC, Hansen EN (2004) Determining consumer preferences for ecolabeled forest products: an experimental approach. J Forest 102(4):28–32
Babiker MH (2005) Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J Int Econ 65:421–445
Boukherroub T, Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (2017) Carbon footprinting in supply chains. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York
Brown TJ, Dacin PA (1997) The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Market 61(1):68–84
Carbon Foot Printing (2012) Report by Carbon Trust. https://www.carbontrust.com/media/44869/j7912_ctv043_carbon_footprinting_aw_interactive.pdf
Carraro C, Soubeyran A (1996) Environmental policy and the choice of production technology. In: Carraro C, Katsoulacos Y, Zepapadeas A (eds) Environmental policy and market structure. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 151–180
Chemama J, Cohen MC, Lobel R, Perakis G (2014) Consumer subsidies with a strategic supplier: commitment vs flexibility Working paper. MIT, Cambridge
Chen L, Lee HL (2014) Mitigate supplier responsibility risk in emerging economies: an ethical sourcing framework. Working paper. Duke University, Durham
Cohen MC, Lobel R, Perakis G (2014) The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Management Science (Forthcoming)
Di Maria C, van der Werf E (2008) Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change. Environ Res Econ 39:55–74
Drake DF (2012) Carbon tariffs: effects in settings with technology choice and foreign comparative advantage. Working paper. Harvard Business School, Boston
Drake DF, Kleindorfer PR, Van Wassenhove LN (2014) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge
Elliott J, Vincent J (2014) An analysis of willingness to pay and reasons for purchasing certified forest products. Master’s thesis. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham
Felder S, Rutherford TF (1993) Unilateral CO2 reductions and carbon leakage: the consequences of international trade in oil and basic materials. J Environ Econ Manage 25:162–176
Guo R, Lee HL, Swinney R (2015) Responsible sourcing in supply chains. Working paper. Duke University, Durham
Hu S, Souza GC, Ferguson ME, Wang W (2015) Capacity investment in renewable energy technology with supply intermittency. Manuf Serv Oper Manage (Forthcoming)
Islegen O, Reichelstein S (2011) Carbon capture by fossil fuel power plants: an economic analysis. Manage Sci 57(1):21–39
Izhutov PA, Lee HL (2014) Dynamics of a responsible business relationship. Working paper. Stanford University, Stanford
Jager-Waldau A (2012) PV status report 2012. European Commission report EUR 25749 EN
Kim S-H (2015) Time to come clean? Disclosure and inspection policies for green production. Oper Res (Forthcoming)
Kleindorfer PR, Neboian A, Roset A, Spinler S (2012) Fleet renewal with electric vehicles at La Poste. Interfaces 42(5):465–477
Kok AG, Shang K, Yucel S (2014) Impact of electricity pricing policy on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Working paper. Duke University, Durham
Krass D, Nedorezov T, Ovchinnikov A (2013) Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Product Oper Manage 22(5):1035–1055
Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaro-Forleo G (2001) Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products”. J Consum Market 18(6):503–520
Lee HL, Rammohan SV (2017) Improving social and environmental performance in global supply chains. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York
Lobel E, Perakis G (2011) Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. Working paper. MIT, Cambridge
Ovchinnikov A (2008) c-Energy’s Red Hill plant: meeting the SO2 challenge, UVA-QA-0726. Darden Business, Charlottesville
Ovchinnikov A, Hvaleva A (2012) Wells fargo: solar energy for Los Angeles branches” (A) and (B), UVA-QA-800, 801. Darden Business, Charlottesville, VA
Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2014) Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility. Working paper. Stanford University, Stanford
Raz G, Ovchinnikov A (2015) Coordinating pricing and supply of public interest goods using government rebates and subsidies. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 62(1):65–79
Raz G, Ovchinnikov AS, Elias A (2014) Chevy Volt: pricing and capacity decisions in response to government incentives for the electric vehicle industry. Darden Business, Charlottesville
Roberts JA (1996) Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. J Bus Res 36(3):217–231
Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Market Res 38(2):225–243
Straughan RD, Roberts JA (1999) Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. J Consum Market 16(6):558–575
Sunar N, Plambeck EL (2014) Allocating emissions among co-products: implications for procurement, offsetting & border adjustment. Working paper. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
van Weele A, van Tubergen K (2017) Responsible purchasing: moving from compliance to value creation in supplier relationships. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York
Wang W, Ferguson ME, Hu S, Souza GC (2013) Dynamic capacity investment with two competing technologies. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 15(4):616–629
Wu OQ, Kapuschinski R (2013) Curtailing intermittent generation in electrical systems. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 15(4):578–595
Zhou Y, Scheller-Wolf A, Secomandi N, Smith S (2014a) Electricity trading and negative prices: storage vs. disposal. Working paper. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
Zhou Y, Scheller-Wolf A, Secomandi N, Smith S (2014b) Managing wind-based electricity generation in the presence of storage and transmission capacity. Working paper. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Yann Bouchery, Charles J. Corbett, Jan C. Fransoo, and Tarkan Tan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ovchinnikov, A. (2017). Green Technology Choice. In: Bouchery, Y., Corbett, C., Fransoo, J., Tan, T. (eds) Sustainable Supply Chains. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29791-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29791-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29789-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29791-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)