Abstract
This chapter constitutes an attempt to revisit the method used to assess wage differences based on sexual orientation, by assessing the impact on wage of apparent sexual orientation—instead of using actual sexual orientation as has always been the case in prior studies.
A two-step method has been used. The first step consists of an econometric estimation of sexual orientation as subjectively perceived—or assumed—by the employer; the second involves the use of so called “perceived sexual orientation” as an explanatory variable in a wage equation.
The econometric results show that “perceived sexual orientation” plays a crucial role in the wage equation. This emphasizes that wage discrimination is not homogeneous among gay employees: the wage gap between an employee “perceived” as gay by his employer, and another “not perceived” as such, is highly significant and larger than –6 %. Moreover, the method used allows estimating the individual cost of coming out in the workplace.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ahmed, A. M., & Hammarstedt, M. (2010). Sexual orientation and earnings: A register data based approach to identify homosexuals. Journal of Population Economics, 23(3), 835–849.
Badgett, L. (1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(4), 726–739.
Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., & Banal, S. (2006). Working under cover: Performance-related self-confidence among members of contextually devalued groups who try to pass. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(3), 337–352.
Black, D., Makar, H., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2003). The earnings effects of sexual orientation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(3), 449–469.
Carroll, L., & Gilroy, P. J. (2002). Role of appearance and nonverbal behaviors in the perception of sexual orientation among lesbians and gay men. Psychological Reports, 91(1), 115–122.
DeJordy, R. (2008). Just passing through: Stigma, passing, and identity decoupling in the workplace. Group & Organization Management, 33(5), 504–531.
Falcoz, C. (2008). Homophobie dans l’entreprise. Haute autorité de lutte contre les discriminations et pour l’égalité (HALDE), Collection Etudes et recherches, La Documentation Française éd.
Freeman, J. B., Johnson, K. L., Ambady, N., & Rule, N. O. (2010). Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1318–1331.
Gaudio, R. (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech, 69(1), 30–57.
Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 321–334.
Laurent, T., & Mihoubi, F. (2012). Sexual orientation and wage discrimination in France: The hidden side of the rainbow. Journal of Labor Research, 33(4), 487–527.
Pierrehumbert, J. B., Bent, T., Munson, B., Bradlow, A. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4-1), 1905–1908.
Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J., Gygax, L., Garcia, S., & Bailey, J. M. (2010). Dissecting “gaydar”: Accuracy and the role of masculinity–femininity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(1), 124–140.
Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008a). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1019–1028.
Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008b). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1100–1105.
Soucek, B. (2014). Perceived homosexuals: Looking gay enough for title VII. American University Law Review, 63(3), 715–788.
Yoshino, K. (2006). Covering: The hidden assault on our civil rights. New York, NY: Random House.
Acknowledgments
This research has been conducted as part of the project Labex MME-DII (ANR11-LBX-0023-01). The authors thank Thomas Köllen for helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laurent, T., Mihoubi, F. (2016). The Role of Apparent Sexual Orientation in Explaining the Heterogeneity of Wage Penalties Among Gay Employees. In: Köllen, T. (eds) Sexual Orientation and Transgender Issues in Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29623-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29623-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29621-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29623-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)