Skip to main content

The Political Entrepreneur: Deus ex Machina of Public Choice Theory?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Contemporary Entrepreneurship
  • 1466 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we give an introduction to the concept of the political entrepreneur and a selective survey of some theoretical and empirical work using it. We argue that the figure of the entrepreneur is as important in politics as in economics and business. In particular, it helps to clarify some difficulties in public choice theory in a similar way as the introduction of the economic entrepreneur into microeconomic theory facilitates a dynamic analysis of the market process. In particular, the idea of the political entrepreneur helps to explain the paradox of voting and the formation of large interest groups. Several examples of case studies on political entrepreneurship are briefly discussed, some of them showing economically successful political-entrepreneurial activities, some others exhibiting pure rent seeking. An evaluation of the welfare effects of political entrepreneurship is therefore still an open question, hence more theoretical and empirical research on political entrepreneurship is strongly required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, F. (2003). The political entrepreneur and the coordination of the political process: A market process perspective of the political market. Review of Austrian Economics, 16, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arce, D. G. (2001). Leadership and the aggregation of international collective action. Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 114–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1959). Toward a theory of price adjustment. In M. Abramovitz (Ed.), The allocation of economic resources: Essays in honor of Bernard Francis Haley (pp. 41–51). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., & Hahn, F. H. (1971). General competitive analysis. San Francisco, CA: Holden Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review, 58(2), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. D. (1999). Political entrepreneurs and the transfer demanding process: Homesteading the unassigned district. Review of Austrian Economics, 12, 201–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Dickson, B. J. (2008). Allies of the state: Democratic support and regime support among China’s private entrepreneurs. China Quarterly, 196, 780–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Dickson, B. J. (2010). Allies of the state. China’s private entrepreneurs and democratic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Lu, M., & He, J. (2008). Power and political participation of entrepreneurs: Evidence from Liuzhou, Guangxi, China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 13, 298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E. K., & Zhou, K. X. (2001). Entrepreneurs and politics in the Chinese transitional economy: Political connections and rent-seeking. China Review, 1, 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1965). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, B. J. (2007). Integrating wealth and power in China: The communist party’s embrace of the private sector. China Quarterly, 192, 827–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, B. J. (2008). Wealth into Power. The communist party’s embrace of China’s private sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eusepi, G., & Wilson, E. J. (2008). How to make a dis-entrepreneur of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur: The impact of institutional settings on growth. Public Choice, 136, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R. C. (2012). Predicting presidential elections and other things (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Schneider, F. (1978). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the U.S. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, J. M. (1982). Can political entrepreneurs solve the free-rider problem? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M., & Sanandaji, T. (Eds.). (2012). Institutional entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. E. (2008). Reflections of an unwitting “political entrepreneur”. Review of Network Economics, 7, 616–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition & entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Meng, L., & Zhang, J. (2006). Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 44, 559–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, E. J. (2002). The legislator as political entrepreneur: Investment in political capital. Review of Austrian Economics, 15, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., & Thomas, D. (2013). Two-tiered political entrepreneurship and the congressional committee system. Public Choice, 154, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, M., & Salerno, J. T. (2011). A theory of political entrepreneurship. Modern Economy, 2, 552–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, C. (2011). China’s changing Guanxi capitalism: Private entrepreneurs between Leninist control and relentless accumulation. Business and Politics, 13(3), Article 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meydani, A. (2008). Political entrepreneurs and electoral capital: The case of the Israeli state economy arrangement law. Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. M. (1980). The organization of interests. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neck, R. (Ed.). (2014). Austrian economics today. Atlantic Economic Journal 42(2), 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, 86, 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs. Agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1st ed. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1983). The theory of economic development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. 1st German ed. 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, L. (1963). Human action: A treatise on economics. Chicago: Henry Regnery. 1st ed. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (1966). Pressure groups and political entrepreneurs: A review article. Papers on Non-market Decision Making, 1, 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. G., & Zhao, L. (2006). Political office and household wealth: Rural China in the Deng Era. China Quarterly, 186, 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiser, P. J. (2008). Alfred Kahn as a case study of a political entrepreneur: An essay in honour of his 90th birthday. Review of Network Economics, 7, 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiaojun, Y. (2012). “To get rich is not only glorious”: Economic reform and the new entrepreneurial party secretaries. China Quarterly, 2010, 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Neck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neck, R. (2016). The Political Entrepreneur: Deus ex Machina of Public Choice Theory?. In: Bögenhold, D., Bonnet, J., Dejardin, M., Garcia Pérez de Lema, D. (eds) Contemporary Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28134-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics