Skip to main content

3D Marine Administration System Based on LADM

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in 3D Geoinformation

Abstract

Oceans cover almost two-thirds of the Earth’s surface. They are the primary regulator of the global climate and sustain a huge variety of plant and animal life. Maritime environment needs to be organized and precisely determined, in order to be sustainable. The registration of marine legal boundaries is a necessary condition for the protection of a living organism, which flows, changes, reverses itself, but is not limitless. Research has confirmed that the common pattern of people-land relationship also exists in the marine environment. Moreover, the marine Cadastre concept suggests that the complexity of interests in marine space is similarly encountered in land. The extension of Cadastre functions from land to marine space is considered reasonable. An inventory of interests that exist in the marine environment is important. At the same time, laws that are the basis of these interests need to be identified and their effect qualified and visualized. The administration of the marine space remains partial and complex, mainly deriving from political interests and strategic benefits. This could be overcome by designing a marine administration system, in accordance with the international practices. A conceptual model may be considered as the base of such system. This model should clearly depict the relevant entities of the system and the relationships between them. Modeling and standardizing systems and processes at an international level, requires the harmonization with international standards and specifically with the ISO 19152—Land Administration Domain Model (LADM), which so far remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to present how rights, restrictions and responsibilities (RRRs) relating to marine space may be organized, in order to develop a marine administration model based on LADM, followed by the database implementation, to support effective and efficient decision making in marine governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO, NOAA of USA and Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) of UK use the term marine spatial planning, while EU argues that maritime spatial planning underlines the holistic cross-sectorial approach of the process.

References

  • Abdullah, A., Omar, A. H., Chan, K. L., Mat Arof, X., Jamil, H., & Teng, C. H. (2014). The development of marine cadastre conceptual model for Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: FIG Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aien, A., Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Williamson, I., & Bennett, R. (2013a). Utilising data modelling to understand the structure of 3D cadastres. Journal of Spatial Science, 58(2), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aien, A., Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Williamson, I., & Wallace, j. (2013b). Towards integration of 3D legal and physical objects in cadastral data models. Land Use Policy, 35, 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, A. (2013). Development of an integrated geographical information system for the marine space. Athens: Hellenic Cadastre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, M., Elema, I. & van der Molen, P. (2003). Ocean governance in the Netherlands North Sea. In New Professional Tasks. Marine Cadastres and Coastal Management, FIG Working Week 2003, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns, A. (2004). Defining a marine cadastre: Legal and institutional aspects. M.Sc thesis, The University of Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns, A., Rajabifard, A., Collier, P.A. & Williamson, I.P. (2003). Issues in defining the concept of a marine cadastre for Australia. In FIG and University of New Brunswick Meeting on Marine Cadastre Issues. University of New Brunswick, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, S., Nichols, S. & Monahan, D. (2003). UNCLOS’ potential influence on a marine cadastre: depth, breadth, and sovereign rights. In Proceedings of the Advisory Board on the Law of the Sea to the International Hydrographic Organization (ABLOS) Conference “Addressing Difficult Issues in UNCLOS”. Presented at the International Hydrographic Bureau, Monaco, October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • COINAtlantic (2009). COINAtlantic Overview. http://coinatlantic.ca/index.php/coinatlantic.

  • Duncan, E. E. & Rahman, A. (2013). A multipurpose cadastral framework for developing countries-concepts. Electronic Journal On Information Systems In Developing Countries, 58(4), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R., Todd, P. J. & Collier, P. A. (2003). Issues in the development of a marine cadastre. In Addressing Difficult Issues in UNCLOS: 2003 ABLOS Conference, Monaco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, J. (2007). The multipurpose marine Cadastre web map. In Proceedings of the 2007 ESRI Surveying and Engineering GIS Summit, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoscience Australia (2010). http://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/marine/jurisdiction/amsis.

  • Griffith-Charles, C., & Sutherland, M. D. (2014). Governance in 3D, LADM compliant marine cadastres. In 4th international workshop on 3D cadastres, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröger, G., Kolbe, T. H., Nagel, C. & Häfele, K.-H. (2012). OpenGIS City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Encoding Standard—Version: 2. 0. Open Geospatial Con-sortium Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henssen, J. L. G. (1995). Basic principles of the main cadastral systems in the world. In Proceedings of the One Day Seminar held during the Annual Meeting of Commission 7, Cadastre and Rural Land Management, of the FIG, Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmen, C. H. J. (2012). A domain model for land administration. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng’ang’a, S. M., Sutherland, M., Cockburn, S., & Nichols, S. (2004). Toward a 3D marine Cadastre in support of good ocean governance: A review of the technical framework requirements. Computers Environment and Urban Systems Journal, 28, 443–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., Ng’ang’a, S. M., Sutherland, M. D. & Cockburn, S. (2006). Marine cadastre concept. chapter 10 in canada’s offshore: jurisdiction, rights and management (3rd ed.). Trafford Publishing, Victoria, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA & BOEM. (2010). http://marinecadastre.gov/.

  • Rahman, A., van Oosterom, P., Hua, T. H., Sharkawi, K. H., Duncan, E. E. (2012). 3D modelling for multipurpose cadastre. In 3rd International Workshop On 3d Cadastres: Developments And Practices, Shenzhen, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajabifard, A., Williamson, I., & Binns, A. (2006). Marine administration research activities within Asia and pacific region—towards a seamless land—sea interface. FIG, Administering Marine Spaces: International Issues, 36, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönsdorf, C., Wilson, D., & Stoter, S. (2014). Integration of land administration domain model with CityGML for 3D cadastre. In 4th International Workshop on 3D Cadastres, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shojaei, D., Kalantari, M., Bishop, I. D., Rajabifard, A., & Aien, A. (2013). Visualization requirements for 3D cadastral systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems Journal, 41, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. D. (2005). Marine Boundaries and Good Governance of Marine Spaces, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. D. & Nichols, S. (2002). Marine boundary delimitation for ocean governance. In Proceedings of FIG Working Week 2002, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R., Alexander, L. & Greenslade, B. (2009). IHO S-100—the new IHO hydrographic geospatial standard for marine data and information. In International Hydrographic Review (vol. 5, No. 1). Monaco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, I. P., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land Administration for Sustainable Development. Redlands, California: Published by ESRI Press Academic. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aikaterini Athanasiou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Athanasiou, A., Pispidikis, I., Dimopoulou, E. (2017). 3D Marine Administration System Based on LADM. In: Abdul-Rahman, A. (eds) Advances in 3D Geoinformation. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25691-7_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics