Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the necessity of goal line technology for top level soccer and compare it to video proof. 1167 games of the 1st and 2nd German Bundesliga were screened for critical goal line decisions as well as other critical goal decisions including penalty calls. 16.8 critical goal line decisions were found per season, of which 76.6 % could directly be resolved by tv-review. On average, 5.0 and 2.8 cases were found respectively in the 1st and 2nd Bundesliga that could justify goal line technology. Furthermore, just 5.0 % of all critical calls concerned goal-line decisions, while 84.3 % involve offside, representing the main reason for critical goal calls. Based on these findings, in terms of a cost-benefit-relation, a video proof could be more suitable than goal line technology. Consequently, we discuss the obstacles and preconditions for the introduction of a video proof in soccer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fédération Internationale de Football Association. http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/81/42/36/log2013en_neutral.pdf
Reid, I., Zisserman, A.: Goal-directed video metrology. In: Cipolla, R., Buxton, B. (eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV’96. LNCS, vol. 2, pp. 647–658. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Fédération Internationale de Football Association. http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/administration/02/35/96/73/fifa-background-paper_glt_june2014_en_neutral.pdf
Spagnolo, P., Leo, M., Mazzeo, P.L., Nitti, M., Stella, E., Distante, A.: Non-Invasive soccer goal line technology: a real case study. In: 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 1011–1018. Conference Publishing Services, Los Alamitos (2013)
Kolbinger, O., Linke, D., Link, D., Lames, M.: Zur Notwendigkeit von Torlinientechnologie in den Fußball-Bundesligen. Deutsche Fußball Liga GmbH, Frankfurt (2014)
Altmann, D.G.: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)
Augste, C., Lames, M.: Differenzierte betrachtung von taktischem verhalten und belastungsstrukturen auf der basis von spielunterbrechungen im fussball. In: Woll, A., Klöckner, W., Reichmann, M., Schlag, M. (eds.), Sportspielkulturen erfolgreich gestalten, pp. 113–116. Czwalina, Hamburg (2008)
Siegle, M., Lames, M.: Game interruptions in elite soccer. J. Sports Sci. 30(7), 619–624 (2012)
Koninklijke Nederlandse Voetbal Bond. http://english.knvb.nl/content/485/refereeing-20
Major League Baseball. http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/official_rules/replay_review.jsp
Retrosheet. http://www.retrosheet.org/replays.htm
International Hockey Federation. http://www.fieldhockey.ca/files/Officials%20Resources/FIH%20Tournament%20Regulations%20Outdoor%20-%20January%202013.pdf
National Football League. https://www.nfl.info/download/2012mediaguides/%20nfl%20rule%20book.pdf
Gillis, B., Helsen, W., Catteeuw, P., Van Roie, E., Wagemans, J.: Interpretation and application of the offside law by expert assistant referees: perception of spatial positions in complex dynamic events on and off the field. J. Sports Sci. 27(6), 551–563 (2009)
Helsen, W., Gillis, B., Weston, M.: Errors in judging “offside” in football: test oft he optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis. J. Sports Sci. 24(5), 521–528 (2006)
Oudejans, R.R.D., Verheijen, R., Bakker, F.C., Gerrits, J.C., Steinbrückner, M., Beek, P.J.: Errors in judging “offside” in football. Nature 404, 33 (2000)
Oudejans, R.R.D., Bakker, F.C., Beek, P.J.: Helsen, gillis and weston (2006) err in testing the optical error hypothesis. J. Sport Sci. 25(9), 987–990 (2007)
Helsen, W., Gillis, B., Weston, M.: Helsen, gillis and weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors. J. Sport Sci. 25(9), 991–994 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kolbinger, O., Linke, D., Link, D., Lames, M. (2015). Do We Need Goal Line Technology in Soccer or Could Video Proof Be a More Suitable Choice: A Cost-Benefit-Analysis of Goal Line Technology in Soccer and Thoughts About an Introduction of Video Proof. In: Cabri, J., Barreiros, J., Pezarat Correia, P. (eds) Sports Science Research and Technology Support. icSPORTS 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 556. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25249-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25249-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25248-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25249-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)