Skip to main content

Effects of Livelihood-Diversification on Sustainability of Natural Resources in the Rangelands of East Africa: Participatory Field Studies and Results of an Agent-Based Model Using the Knowledge of Indigenous Maasai Pastoralists of Kenya

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Modeling with Stakeholders

Abstract

Like similar societies in Africa, livelihood-diversification has become a common socioeconomic and ecological adaptation among the Maasai pastoralist inhabitants of the rangelands of Kenya, East Africa. A participatory study conducted with the Maasai of Kenya reveals that, although majority of the households derive their sustenance directly from traditional rainfall-dependent livestock husbandry, over 70 % have diversified into other systems of livelihoods. It is important to note that rainfall-dependent pastoralism, including Maasai-pastoralism, is a major economic backbone within the rangelands that characterizes much of Kenya, and indeed the greater Horn of Africa. Maasai pastoralists contribute greatly to the country’s livestock industry, to sustainable utilization of rangeland resources, and to local food security. The on-going livelihood-diversification, therefore, not only triggers changes in Maasai livelihoods, but it also shapes the sustainability of natural resources in the rangelands. Thus, the interactions between environmental, social and economic conditions that will likely result from climate change could cause a cascade of deleterious effects on the sustainability of ecosystems and natural resources in the rangelands of East Africa. The objective of this chapter is to understand how knowledge, values, and preferences in environment and natural resource management in Maasai-pastoralism compare to emerging trends as Maasai’s production system continues to diversify. I provide an approach to better understand the structure and dynamics of Maasai-pastoralism across scales vis-à-vis resource management. The premise of this chapter is that Maasai pastoralists, the key stakeholders in resource management in the rangelands they inhabit, have the greatest knowledge about environment and natural resource management and therefore provide considerable expertise to understanding the interaction between climate change, human behavior and livelihoods, and social and ecological dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ALDEV (1962) African Land Development Board. Land development in Kenya. Report for 1946–1962. Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker SJK (1974) A background to the study of drought in East Africa. Afr Aff 73:170–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett TJ (1988) The political ecology of peasant-herder conflicts in the Northern Ivory Coast. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 78(3):453–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnke RH, Scoones I (1993) Rethinking range ecology: implications for rangeland management in Africa. In: Behnke RH, Scoones, Kerven C (eds) Range ecology at disequilibrium. Overseas Development Institute, London, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 15:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coast E (2002) Maasai socioeconomic conditions: a cross-border comparison. Hum Ecol 30:79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL (1994) Analysis of longitudinal data. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis J, Galvin K (1994) Climate patterns and land-use practices in the dry zones of Africa. BioScience 44(5):340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1990) Food and Agriculture Organization. The community’s toolbox: the idea, methods and tools for participatory assessment, monitoring and evaluation in community forestry. FAO

    Google Scholar 

  • Friis-Hansen E, Sthapit B (eds) (2000) Participatory approaches to the conservation and use of plant genetic resources. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, p 214

    Google Scholar 

  • GoK (2002) Government of Kenya. District development plan. Government Printer, Nairobi, Kajiado

    Google Scholar 

  • GoK-UNEP (2001) Government of Kenya and UNEP 2001. Devastating drought in Kenya: environmental impacts and responses

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. intergovernmental panel on climate change-third assessment report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. intergovernmental panel on climate change-fourth assessment report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IRIN (2005) United Nations Integrated Regional Information Networks. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameri-Mbote P (2002) Property rights and biodiversity management in Kenya. ACTS Press, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaser G, Hardy DR, Mölg T, Bradley RS, Hyera TM (2004) Modern glacier retreat on Kilimanjaro as evidence of climate change: observation and facts. Int J Climatol 24:329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimani K, Pickard J (1998) Recent trends and implications of group ranch sub- division and fragmentation in Kajiado District, Kenya. Geogr J 164(2):202–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansing JS, Kremer JN (1993) Emergent properties of Balinese water temples. Am Anthropol 95:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee L, Scerri A, James P, Thom JA, Padgham L, Hickmott S, Deng H, Cahill F (2013) Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach. Environ Dev Sustain 15(1):225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitima JM, Olson JM (2006) Arid and Semi-Arid agro-pastoral systems in transition. Lucid Working Policy Brief 2

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney C, New M, Lizcano G (2007) UNDP Climate change country profiles: Kenya. University of Oxford, Oxford, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller C, Waha K, Bondeau A, Heinke J (2014) Hotspots of climate change impacts in sub-Saharan Africa and implications for adaptation and development. Glob Chang Biol. doi:10.1111/gcb.12586

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwangi M (2005) Effects of drought on nomadic pastoralism: impacts and adaptation among the Maasai of Kenya. Global environmental change, globalization and international security: new challenges for the 21st century. IHDP, Bonn, pp 378

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwangi M (2007) Gender and drought hazards in the rangelands of the Great Horn of Africa: is gender equity the only solution? Women Environ Int 74/75:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwangi M (2012) Effects of drought on nomadic pastoralism: impacts and adaptation among the Maasai of Kajiado District, Kenya. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwangi M (2016) Globalization, climate change, and evolution of an indigenous livelihood: the scalar transformation of Maasai-Pastoralism in the Rangelands of East Africa (in prep)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niamir-Fuller M (1999) Conflict management and mobility among pastoralists in Karamoja, Uganda. In: Niamir M (ed) Managing mobility in African rangelands: the legitimization of transhumance. Intermediate Technology Publication, London, pp 18–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wost C (2007) The implications of complexity for integrated resource management. Environ Model Softw 22(5):561–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn CH, Huby M, Kiwasila H, Lovett JC (2003) Local perceptions of risk to livelihood in semi-arid Tanzania. J Environ Manage 68:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1999) SAS/STAT User’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1995a) Exploiting heterogeneity: habitat use by cattle in the communal areas of Zimbabwe. J Arid Environ 29:221–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1995b) New directions in pastoral development in Africa. In: Scoones I (ed) Living with uncertainty: new directions in pastoral development in Africa. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindiga I (1984) Land and population problems in Kajiado and Narok, Kenya. Afr Stud Rev 27(1):23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar MVK, Das HP, Brunini O (2005) Impacts of present and future climate variability and change on agriculture and forestry in the arid and semi-arid tropics. Clim Chang 70(1–2):31–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K, Barrett CB, Box PW (2000) Participatory risk mapping for targeting research and assistance: with an example from East African pastoralist. World Dev 28(11):1945–1959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J (1986) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP-GoK. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Government of Kenya (GoK) (2000) Devastating Drought in Kenya. Environmental impacts and responses. UNEP/GoK, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller R (1988) Emutai: crisis and response in Maasailand, 1883–1902. In: Johnson D, Anderson DM (eds) Ecology of survival. Boulder, Westview, pp 73–113

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to the Maasai community of East Africa for their continued willingness to share their wealth of knowledge with me. Thanks to three geographers—Drs. Alan Taylor, Karl Zimmerer and the late C. Gregory Knight—for valuable discussions in the early framing of research arguments. Dr. Zimmerer, thank you for challenging me to unpack the system of nomadic Maasai-pastoralism: this article is one among the various unpacked outputs. Special thanks to The International Foundation for Sciences, United Nations University, PennState’s Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, and Miombo Network for providing partial financial and logistic support for the broader projects that inform this chapter. The comments by Dr. Steven Gray and an anonymous reviewer helped improve this chapter, and are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Mwangi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mwangi, M. (2017). Effects of Livelihood-Diversification on Sustainability of Natural Resources in the Rangelands of East Africa: Participatory Field Studies and Results of an Agent-Based Model Using the Knowledge of Indigenous Maasai Pastoralists of Kenya. In: Gray, S., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., Gray, S. (eds) Environmental Modeling with Stakeholders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25053-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics