Skip to main content

Natural Language Generation for Declarative Process Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation (EOMAS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 231))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 693 Accesses

Abstract

Two different types of processes can be distinguished: well-structured routine processes and agile processes where the control-flow cannot be predefined a priori. In a similar way, two modeling paradigms exist whereby procedural models are more adequate for routine processes and declarative models are more suitable for agile processes. Often business analysts are not confident in understanding process models; this holds even more for declarative process models. Natural language support for this kind of processes in order to improve their readability is desirable. In the work at hand we define a technique that transforms declarative models to intuitive natural language texts. Hereof, the approach focuses on content determination and structuring the output texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our binary trees are object trees without optional associations. Hence, the meta model prevents information loss during serialization.

  2. 2.

    Notations vary; we have chosen the notation used in [20].

  3. 3.

    http://www.cogentex.com/technology/realpro/index.shtml, l.a.: March 13th, 2015.

References

  1. Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Jablonski, S.: MOBILE: A modular workflow model and architecture. In: Working Conference on Dynamic Modelling and Information Systems (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative workflows: balancing between flexibility and support. Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 23(2), 99–113 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pichler, P., Weber, B., Zugal, S., Pinggera, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Imperative versus declarative process modeling languages: an empirical investigation. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 383–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Leopold, H., Mendling, J., Polyvyanyy, A.: Supporting process model validation through natural language generation. IEEE TSE 40(8), 818–840 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reiter, E., Dale, R.: Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalianis, H.: A method for validating a conceptual model by natural language discourse generation. In: Loucopoulos, P. (ed.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. LNCS, vol. 593, pp. 425–444. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Meziane, F., Athanasakis, N., Ananiadou, S.: Generating natural language specifications from uml class diagrams. Req. Eng. 13(1), 1–18 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malik, S., Bajwa, I.S.: Back to origin: transformation of business process models to business rules. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 611–622. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeising, M., Schönig, S., Jablonski, S.: Towards a common platform for the support of routine and agile business processes. In: Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schönig, S., Cabanillas, C., Jablonski, S., Mendling, J.: Mining the organisational perspective in agile business processes. In: Gaaloul, K., Schmidt, R., Nurcan, S., Guerreiro, S., Ma, Q. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. LNBIP, vol. 214, pp. 37–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Reiter, E.: Has a consensus nl generation architecture appeared, and is it psycholinguistically plausible?. In: Proceedings of the 7th INLG, pp. 163–170 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lavoie, B., Rambow, O.: A fast and portable realizer for text generation systems. In: 5th ANLP Conference, ANLC 1997, pp. 265–268. ACL (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coşkunçay, A.: An Approach for Generating Natural Language Specifications by Utilizing Business Process Models, Master’s thesis, Middle East TU (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burden, H., Heldal, R.: Natural language generation from class diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on MoDeVVa. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lavoie, B., Rambow, O., Reiter, E.: Customizable descriptions of object-oriented models. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on ANLP, pp. 253–256 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Bradford Books, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: Refactoring of process model activity labels. In: Hopfe, C.J., Rezgui, Y., Mètais, E., Preece, A., Li, H. (eds.) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. LNCS, vol. 6177, pp. 268–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M., Ter Hofstede, A.H., Edmond, D.: Workflow resource patterns: identification, representation and tool support. In: Pastor, O., e Cunha, J.F. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 216–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Uszkoreit, H.: Categorial Unification Grammars. In: Proceedings of COLING (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bar-Hillel, Y.: A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description. Language 29, 47–58 (1953)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Shieber, S.M.: An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes Series, vol. 4. Center for SLI, Stanford (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. McKeown, K.R.: Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge University Press, New York (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3), 243–281 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Melčuk, I.A.: Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Daw Book Collectors, State University Press of New York, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Ackermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ackermann, L., Schönig, S., Zeising, M., Jablonski, S. (2015). Natural Language Generation for Declarative Process Models. In: Barjis, J., Pergl, R., Babkin, E. (eds) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. EOMAS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24626-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24626-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24625-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24626-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics