Skip to main content

Measuring the Quality of Relational-to-RDF Mappings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web (KESW 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 518))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Mapping from relational data to Linked Data (RDB2RDF) is an essential prerequisite for evolving the World Wide Web into the Web of Data. We propose a methodology to evaluate the quality of such mappings against a set of objective metrics. Our methodology, whose key principles have been approved by a survey among RDB2RDF experts, can be applied to evaluate both automatically and manually performed mappings regardless of their representation. The main contributions of the paper are: (1) assessing the quality requirements for mappings between relational databases and RDF, and (2) proposing methods for measuring how well a given mapping meets the requirements. We showcase the usage of the individual metrics with illustrative examples from a real-life application. Additionally, we provide guidelines to improve a given mapping with regard to the specific metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arenas, M., et al.: A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF. Working Draft. W3C (2012). http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/

  2. Auer, S., et al.: Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF (2010). http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/reqscore (visited on June 12, 2013)

  3. Bertails, A., Prud’hommeaux, E.G.: Interpreting relational databases in the RDF domain. In: K-CAP, pp. 129–136 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bizer, C.: Quality Driven Information Filtering: In the Context ofWeb Based Information Systems. PhD thesis. Free University of Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Das, S., Sundara, S., Cyganiak, R.: R2RML: RDB to RDF Mapping Language. Recommendation. W3C (2012). http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/

  6. Dean, M. et al.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. Recommendation. W3C (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erling, O.: Requirements for Relational to RDF Mapping (2008). http://www.w3.org/wiki/Rdb2RdfXG/ReqForMappingByOErling (visited on June 12, 2013)

  8. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology alignment. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flemming, A.: Quality Characteristics of Linked Data Publishing Datasources. MA thesis. Humboldt-Universität of Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hillairet, G., Bertrand, F., Lafaye, J.-Y.: MDE for publishing data on the semantic web. In: TWOMDE, pp. 32–46. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-395/

  11. Hogan, A., et al.: An empirical survey of linked data conformance. Web Semantics 14, 14–44 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hogan, A., et al.: Weaving the pedanticweb. In: LDOW (2010). http://ceurws.org/Vol-628/

  13. Liu, C., Li, J.: Designing quality XML schemas from E-R diagrams. In: Yu, J.X., Kitsuregawa, M., Leong, H.-V. (eds.) WAIM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4016, pp. 508–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahoo, S.S., et al.: A Survey of Current Approaches for Mapping of Relational Databases to RDF. RDB2RDF Incubator Group Report. W3C (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sahuguet, A.: Everything you ever wanted to know about DTDs, but were afraid to ask (extended abstract). In: Suciu, D., Vossen, G. (eds.) WebDB 2000. LNCS, vol. 1997, pp. 171–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt, A., et al.: XMark: a benchmark for XML data management. In: VLDB, pp. 974–985 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shanmugasundaram, J., et al.: Efficiently publishing relational data as XML documents. The VLDB Journal 10(2–3), 133–154 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shanmugasundaram, J., et al.: Relational databases for querying xml documents: limitations and opportunities. In: VLDB, pp. 302–314. Morgan Kaufmann (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spanos, D.-E., Stavrou, P., Mitrou, N.: Bringing relational databases into the semantic web: A survey. Semantic Web 3(2), 169–209 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Rijsbergen, C.: Information Retrieval (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zaveri, A., et al.: Quality Assessment Methodologies for Linked Open Data. Semantic Web Journal, major revision (2013). http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/quality-assessment-linked-open-datasurvey

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darya Tarasowa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tarasowa, D., Lange, C., Auer, S. (2015). Measuring the Quality of Relational-to-RDF Mappings. In: Klinov, P., Mouromtsev, D. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web. KESW 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 518. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24543-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24543-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24542-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24543-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics