Abstract
The paper develops an idea of an engineering ontology whose purpose is to represent philosophy as a research discipline in the humanities. I discuss a three recent attempts in this respect with the aim to identify their modelling potential. The upshot of this analysis leads to a new conceptual framework for ontological engineering for philosophy. I show how this framework can be implemented in the form of a simple OWL ontology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barsalou, L.W.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In: Lehrer, A., Kittay, E.F. (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrasts, pp. 21–74. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1992)
Buckner, C., Niepert, M., Allen, C.: From encyclopedia to ontology: Toward dynamic representation of the discipline of philosophy. Synthese 182(2), 205–233 (2011)
Correia, F., Schnieder, B.: Grounding: an opinionated introduction. In: Metaphysical Grounding, pp. 1–36. Cambridge University Press (2012)
DCU Ontology Team: NeMO - NeDiMAH Methods Ontology. NeMO Entity Class Definitions. Tech. Rep. 0.1, Digital Curation Unit (2015). http://www.nedimah.eu/reports/developing-nemo-nedimah-methods-ontology
DIorio, P.: Discovery. D1.8 Final Report. Tech. rep. (2009). http://www.discovery-project.eu/reports/discovery-final-report.pdf
Doerr, M.: The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module: An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine 24(3), 75–92 (2003)
Hennicke, S., Gradmann, S., Dill, K., Tschumpel, G., Thoden, K., Morbindoni, C., Pichler, A.: D3.4 Research Report on DH Scholarly Primitives. Tech. rep. (2015). http://dm2e.eu/files/D3.4_1.0_Research_Report_on_DH_Scholarly_Primitives_150210.pdf
IFLA: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. K. G. Saur (1998)
Pasin, M., Motta, E.: Ontological requirements for annotation and navigation of philosophical resources. Synthese 182(2), 235–267 (2011)
Pichler, A., Zöllner-Weber, A.: Sharing and debating Wittgenstein by using an ontology. Literary and Linguistic Computing 28(4), 700–707 (2013)
Schaffer, J.: On what grounds what. In: Metametaphysics: new essays on the foundations of ontology, pp. 347–383. Oxford University Press (2009)
Schaffer, J.: Grounding, transitivity, and contrastivity. In: Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, pp. 122–38 (2012)
Veltman, K.H.: Towards a Semantic Web for Culture. Journal of Digital Information 4(4) (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Garbacz, P. (2015). Challenges for Ontological Engineering in the Humanities – A Case Study of Philosophy. In: Garoufallou, E., Hartley, R., Gaitanou, P. (eds) Metadata and Semantics Research. MTSR 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24129-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24129-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24128-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24129-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)