Abstract
Socialized or socially assistive robots fall into the more general class of service robots, which, according to the International Service Robot Association (ISRA), are defined as ‘machines that sense, think, and act to benefit or extend human capabilities, and increase human productivity’. Among others, socialized robots could provide continuous care and entertainment of the impaired and the elderly for improving their quality of life at the final period of their life. This chapter presents a convenient classification and a number of definitions of socialized robots including a representative set of anthropomorphic and zoomorphic socialized robots. Then, the chapter discusses the fundamental ethical aspects of socialized robots, and reviews three case studies concerning autistic children-robot and dementia elderly-robot interaction.
The top two awards don’t even go to robots.
Chuck Gozdzinski
Liveone day at a time emphasizing ethics rather than rules.
Wayne Dyer
References
Breazeal C (2004) Social interactions in HRI: the robot view. IEEE Trans Man Cybern Syst Part C 34(2):181–186
Breazeal C (2003) Towards sociable robots. Rob Auton Syst 42:167–175
Breazeal C (2002) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Dautenhahn K (1998) The art of designing socially intelligent agents: science, fiction, and the human in the loop. Appl Artif Intell 12(8–9):573–617
Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci 362(1480):679–704
Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:143–166
Hollerbach JM, Jacobsen SC (1996) Anthropomorphic robots and human interactions. In: Proceedings of First Intetnational Symposium Humanoid Robotics, pp 83–91
Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K (2002) The correspondence problem. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL (eds) Imitation in animals and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 41–61
Breazeal C, Scassellati B (2002) Robots that imitate humans. Trends Cogn Sci 6(11):481–487
Wada K, Shibata T, Musha T, Kimura S (2008) Robot therapy for elders affected by dementia. IEEE Trans Eng Med Biol 27(4):53–60
Lathan C, Brisben AJ, Safos CS (2005) CosmoBot levels the playing field for disabled children. Interactions 12(2):14–16
Kahn PH, Freier NG Jr, Friedman B, Severson RL, Feldman EN (2004) Social and moral relationships with robotic others? In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, Kurashiki, Okayama, pp 20–22
Robot Pets and Toys www.robotshop.com/en/robot-pets-toys.html
Fujita Y, Onaka SI, Takano Y, Funada JUNI, Iwasawa T, Nishizawa T, Sato T, Osada JUNI (2005) Development of childware robot PaPeRo, Nippon Robotto Gakkai Gakujutsu Koenkai Yo Koshu (CD-ROM), pp 1–11
Boucher J (1999) Editorial: interventions with children with autism methods based on play. Child Lang Teach Ther 15:1–15
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dubowski K (2005) Robots as isolators or mediators for children with autism? A cautionary tale. In: Proceeding of symposium on robot companions hard problems and open challenges in human robot interaction, Hatfield, pp 82–88, 14–15 April 2005
Feil-Seifer D, Mataric MJ (2011) Ethical principles for socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18(1):24–31
Dogramadzi S, Virk S, Tokhi O, Harper C (2009) Service robot ethics. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on climbing and walking robots and the support technologies for mobile machines, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 133–139
http://www.infoniac.com/hi-tech/robotics-expert-calls-for-robot-ethics-guidelines.html
Wada K, Shibata T, Saito T, Sakamoto K, Tanie K (2003) Psychological and social effects of one year robot assisted activity on elderly people at a health service facility for the aged. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Taipei, pp 2785–2790
Melson GF, Kahn PH Jr, Beck A, Friedman B (2009) Robotic pets in human lives: Implications for the human-animal bond and for human relationships with personified technologies. J Soc Issues 65(3):545–567
Kahn Jr PH, Friedman B, Hagman J (2002) I care about him as a pal: conceptions of robotic pets in on-line AIBO discussion forums. In: Proceedings of CHI’02 on human factors in computing systems, pp 632–633
Kahn PH, Friedman Jr B, Perez-Granados DR, Freier NG (2004) Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. In: Proceedings of CHI’04 (extended abstracts) on human factors in computing systems, pp 1449–1452
Stanton CM, Kahn PH, Severson Jr RL, Ruckert JH, Gill BT (2008) Robot animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. In: Proceedings on 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, pp 271–278
Friedman B, Kahn PH Jr, Hagman J (2003) Hardware companions? What on-line AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationships. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 273–290
Kahn PH et al (2012) Robovie moral accountability study HRI 2012.pdf. http://depts.washington.edu/hints
Dautenhahn K, Werry I (2004) Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation, and challenges. Pragmat Cogn 12(1):1–35
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P (2009) From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on advances in computer-human interactions (ACHI’09), Cancum, Mexico, 1–7 Feb 2009
Robins B, Dautenhahn K et al (2012) Scenarios of robot-assisted play for children with cognitive and physical disabilities. Interact Stud 13(2):189–234
Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2014) Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: novel play scenario implementations with children with autism. Int J Social Robot 6:397–415
Wainer J, Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K (2014) Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Trans Auton Mental Dev 6(3):183–198
Ferrari E, Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2010) Does it work?’’ A framework to evaluate the effectiveness of a robotic toy for children with special needs. In: Proceedings of 19th international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Principe di Piemonte-Viareggio, pp 100–106, 12–15 Sep 2010
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Billard A (2004) Effects of repeated exposure of a humanoid robot on children with autism: can we encourage basic social interaction skills? In: Keates S, Clarkson J, Langdon J, Robinson P (eds) Designing a more inclusive world, Springer, London, pp 225–236
AIST: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Paro found to improve brain function in patients with cognition disorders. Transactions of the AIST, 16 Sept 2005
Sullins P (2006) When is a robot a moral agent? Int Rev Inf Ethics 6(12):23–30
Calo CJ, Hunt-Bull N, Lewis L, Metzer T (2011) Ethical implications of using Paro robot with a focus on dementia patient care. In: Proceeding of 2011 AAI workshop (WS-11–12) on human-robot interaction in elder care, pp 20–24
Barcousky L (2010) PARO Pals: Japanese robot has brought out the best in elderly with Alzheimer’s disease. Pittsburg Post-Gazette
Kahn P et al. Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? http://depts.washington.edu/hints/publications
Saint-Aimé S, Le-Pevedic B, Duhaut D iGrace: emotional computational model for Eml companion robot. In: Kulyukin VA (ed) Advances in human robot interaction, in-tech (Open source: www.interchopen.com)
Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16:141–161
Borenstein J, Pearson Y (2010) Robot caregivers: harbingers or expanded freedom for all? Ethics Inf Technol 12:277–288
Lazarus RS (1991) Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Lazarus RS (2001) Relational meaning and discrete emotions. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Sherer KR (2005) What are emotions? How can they be measured? Soc Sci Inf 44(4):695–729
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tzafestas, S.G. (2016). Socialized Roboethics. In: Roboethics. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 79. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21714-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21714-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21713-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21714-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)