Abstract
We discuss a model of three contextual layers relating to early literacy development. These layers assessed mothers’ beliefs and the nature of their actual literacy interactions with their children. The layers (from the farthest to the nearest) are: mothers’ general pedagogical beliefs regarding literacy, mothers’ specific estimation of their children’s early literacy, and the nature of the actual mother-child writing interactions. We tease apart the relative contribution of these layers in predicting early literacy. In general, mothers value literacy knowledge and literacy activities at home and these pedagogical beliefs predicted children’s literacy. The mothers’ estimation of their children’s literacy contributed to all literacy skills beyond the contribution of mothers’ pedagogical beliefs. The mothers varied widely in the nature of their writing guidance. Writing mediation measures correlated significantly with the children’s early literacy skills and predicted the children’s literacy after controlling for the mothers’ pedagogical beliefs and estimation of the children’s literacy. We discuss the merits of writing interactions in light of the increasing significance attributed to early literacy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Hebrew words are spelled using International Phonetic Alphabetic symbols.
References
Aram, D. (2008). Parent-child interaction and early literacy development. Early Education and Development, 19, 1–6.
Aram, D., & Levin, I. (2001). Mother-child joint writing in low SES: Socio-cultural factors, maternal mediation and emergent literacy. Cognitive Development, 16, 831–852.
Aram, D., & Levin, I. (2004). The role of maternal mediation of writing to kindergartners in promoting literacy in school: A longitudinal perspective. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 387–409.
Aram, D., & Levin, I. (2011). Home support of children in the writing process: Contributions to early literacy. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy (Vol. 3, pp. 189–199). New York: Guilford.
Aram, D., Abiri, S., & Elad, L. (2014). Predicting early spelling: The contribution of children’s early literacy, self-regulation, private speech during spelling, and parental spelling support. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 685–707.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1971). The relevance of education. New York: Norton.
Evans, M. A., Bell, M., Mansell, J., & Shaw, D. (2001, April). Parental coaching in child-to-parent book reading: Associations with parent values and child reading skill. Paper presented in M. A. Evans’ (Chair) symposium: Classroom and home experiences and their associations with reading skill development, the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis.
Feuerstein, R., & Feuerstein, S. (1991). Mediated learning experience: A theoretical review. In R. Feuerstein, P. Klein, & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Mediated learning experience (MLE): Theoretical, psychosocial, and learning implications (pp. 3–51). London: Freund.
Glascoe, F. P. (1999). The value of parents’ concerns to detect and address developmental and behavioural problems. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 35, 1–8.
Hall, N. (2000). Interactive writing with young children. Childhood Education, 76, 358–364.
Heather, B. T., Anthony, J. L., Aghara, R., Smith, K. E., & Landry, S. H. (2008). The interaction of early maternal responsiveness and children’s cognitive abilities on later decoding and reading comprehension skills. Early Education and Development, 19, 188–207.
Holden, G. W. (1997). Parents and dynamics of child rearing. Boulder: Westview, Harper Collins.
Korat, O. (2004). Mothers’ and teachers’ attributions of the academic functioning of Israeli second graders: A comparison between social groups. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 485–501.
Korat, O., & Levin, I. (2001). Maternal beliefs, mother–child interaction, and child’s literacy: Comparison of independent and collaborative text writing between two social groups. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 397–420.
Levin, I., & Bus, A. (2003). How is emergent writing based on drawing? Analyses of children’s products and their sorting by children and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 39, 891–905.
Levin, I., Share, D. L., & Shatil, E. (1996). A qualitative-quantitative study of preschool writing: Its development and contribution to school literacy. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 271–293). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Levin, I., Aram, D., Tolchinsky, L., & McBride, C. (2013). Maternal mediation of writing and children’s early spelling and reading: The Semitic abjad versus the European alphabet. Writing Systems Research, 2, 134–155.
Leyva, D., Reese, E., & Wiser, M. (2012). Early understanding of the functions of print: Parent-child interaction and preschoolers’ notating skills. First Language, 32, 301–323.
Lin, D., McBride-Chang, C., Aram, D., Levin, I., Cheung, Y. M., Chow, Y. Y., & Tolchinsky, L. (2009). Maternal mediation of writing in Chinese children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7/8), 1286–1311.
Marvin, A. C., & Ogden, N. J. (2002). A home literacy inventory: Assessing young children’s for emergent literacy. Young Exceptional Children, 5, 2–10.
Ministry of Education. (2006). Tochnit limudim “Tashtih likrat kria ve-ktiva ba-gan” [National curriculum: A foundation towards reading and writing in kindergarten]. Jerusalem: Author. [Hebrew].
Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2010). Parental strategies to scaffold emergent writing skills in the preschool child within the home environment. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 30, 79–94.
Neumann, M. M., Hood, M., & Neumann, D. (2008). The scaffolding of emergent literacy skills in the home environment: A case study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 313–319.
Neumann, M. M., Hood, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2009). The scaffolding of emergent literacy skills in the home environment: A case study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 313–319.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2002). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Skibbe, L. E., Justice, L. M., Zucker, T. A., & McGinty, A. S. (2008). Relations among maternal literacy beliefs, home literacy practices, and the emergent literacy skills of preschoolers with specific language impairment. Early Education and Development, 19, 68–88.
Skibbe, L. E., Worzalla, S. L., Hindman, A. H., Aram, D., & Morrison, F. J. (2013). Longitudinal relations between parental writing support and preschoolers’ language and literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 387–401.
Sonnenschein, S., Stapleton, L. M., & Metzger, S. R. (2014). What parents know about how well their children are doing in school. The Journal of Educational Research, 17, 152–162.
Sparks, A., & Reese, E. (2013). From reminiscing to reading: Home contributions to children’s developing language and literacy in low-income families. First Language, 33, 89–109.
Stright, A. D., Herr, M. Y., & Neitzel, C. (2009). Maternal scaffolding of children’s problem solving and children’s adjustment in kindergarten: Hmong families in the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 207–218.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wasik, B. H., & Herrmann, S. (2004). Family literacy: History, concepts, services. In B. H. Wasik (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 3–23). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Weigel, D. J., Martin, S. S., & Bennett, K. K. (2006). Mothers’ literacy beliefs: Connections with the home literacy environment and pre-school children’s literacy development. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6, 191–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Please read each sentence and rate your agreement level on a 5-points scale from (1) disagree completely to (5) agree completely.
1. It is good for kindergartners to identify the letters of the alphabet (e.g., can recognize the letter B in a word, such as ‘baby’) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2. Parents should direct their children’s attention to the sounds in the language (e.g., note that the words ‘bag’ and ‘book’ start with the same sound) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
3. There is no need to engage in writing activities with kindergarten children | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
4. Kindergartners can succeed in separating a word into its sounds (e.g., the word ‘bag’ is composed of /b/ /a/ /g/) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
5. When kindergartners write words with their parents, parents should encourage correct writing (e.g., that the child should write all the letters that should appear in the word without omitting any) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
6. There is no point in parents saying the names of letters to their children or asking them to say the letter names (e.g., “here is the letter A” or “which letter is this?”) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
7. Kindergarten children should already be able to identify the opening sound in a word (e.g., ‘rock’ starts with /r/) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
8. When a child asks the parent to write something, the parent can teach the child about the letters and how to write them | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
9. Kindergartners do not need to be able to identify the letters of the alphabet | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
10. Parents should engage with their kindergartners in writing activities (e.g., writing a birthday invitation) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
11. Kindergarten children do not yet need to recognize the names of the letters in their name | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
12. It is hard for kindergarten children to say the sounds that comprise the name of a friend (e.g., the name TOM is comprised of /T/ /O/ /M/) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
13. During joint writing, parents should not correct their children (e.g., erasing or adding a letter) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
14. Kindergarten children should know how to write the names of their family members | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
15. It is not recommended that parents separate words into their component sounds for their children (e.g., ‘black’: /bl/ /a/ /ck/) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
16. During joint writing, parents should let their children act independently while the parent monitor the children’s activities | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
17. It is important that kindergarten children should know how to name letters (e.g., when they see a B, they should be able to say ‘bee’) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
18. Parents should engage their children in activities of letter identification and naming to help the children advance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
19. Kindergarten children do not need to recognize that two words begin with the same letter (e.g., book and bake) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
20. Kindergarten children do not need to know how to write words | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aram, D., Levin, I. (2016). Mother-Child Joint Writing as a Learning Activity. In: Perera, J., Aparici, M., Rosado, E., Salas, N. (eds) Written and Spoken Language Development across the Lifespan. Literacy Studies, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21136-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21136-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21135-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21136-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)