Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter, we introduce the concept of a network (also known as a graph). Working with a citation network build from United States Supreme Court opinions, the topics of graph drawing, centrality measures, and community detection are all explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/4/6/

References

  1. Erwin Chemerinsky. Constitutional law, principles and policies (introduction to law series). New York,(NY): Aspen Publishers, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gabor Csardi and Tamas Nepusz. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems:1695, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James H Fowler and Sangick Jeon. The authority of supreme court precedent. Social networks, 30(1):16–30, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James H Fowler, Timothy R Johnson, James F Spriggs, Sangick Jeon, and Paul J Wahlbeck. Network analysis and the law: Measuring the legal importance of precedents at the us supreme court. Political Analysis, 15(3):324–346, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas MJ Fruchterman and Edward M Reingold. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and experience, 21(11): 1129–1164, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eric D Kolaczyk. Statistical analysis of network data: methods and models. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gregory H Maddox. Gender and famine in central tanzania: 1916–1961. African studies review, 39(01):83–101, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sridhar Nerur, Riyaz Sikora, George Mangalaraj, and VenuGopal Balijepally. Assessing the relative influence of journals in a citation network. Communications of the ACM, 48(11):71–74, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence Page, Sergey Brin, Rajeev Motwani, and Terry Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruce Russett and Taylor Arnold. Who talks, and who’s listening? networks of international security studies. Security Dialogue, 41(6):589–598, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harold J Spaeth. The Supreme Court Database. Center for Empirical Research in the Law at Washington University, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peter Uvin. Prejudice, crisis, and genocide in rwanda. African Studies Review, 40(02):91–115, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley Wasserman. Social network analysis: Methods and applications, volume 8. Cambridge university press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnold, T., Tilton, L. (2015). Networks. In: Humanities Data in R. Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20702-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics