Abstract
We work with a multi-national network of computer clubs for families and children called come_IN. In two such clubs (located in Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank), we worked with children on playful approaches concerning 3D modeling and 3D printing within a five-week, qualitative field study. Based on this study, we report on the achievements as well as on the difficulties of digital fabrication and of “Making” in developmental and educational contexts. The benefits are related to an overarching theme of self-expression where the main focus was on dimensions as playfulness, approachable complexity, individualization, immediacy and physicality and collaboration as well as motivation. The problematic aspects were mostly related to socio-technical limitations concerning the themes of orientation and camera control, the lack of coordination and collaboration features, usability and UX issues as well as the construction and limitations of current 3D printers. Based on those findings, we have derived implications for the design and the appropriation of future systems for digital fabrication with children, especially in developmental/educational settings, such as improvements of their collaboration support or better feedback mechanisms regarding the system status towards the end user.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Printrbot Simple, a compact 3D printer we used for this study costs 349 USD as a kit, just to give an example. The printer works with Fused Filament Modeling—basically similar to the working principle of a hot glue gun, however, computer controlled and extruding harder plastic.
- 2.
See http://fablabs.io for a global overview.
- 3.
The numbers relate to the camp of Jalazone as estimated by the camp administration.
- 4.
- 5.
We used Repetier Host with the Slic3r option, see http://repetier.com.
References
Aal, K., Yerousis, G., Schubert, K., Hornung, D., Stickel, O., & Wulf, V. (2014). Come_in@Palestine: Adapting a German computer club concept to a Palestinian refugee camp. In Proceedings of CABS (pp. 111–120).
Adams, A., Lunt, P., & Cairns, P. (2008). A qualitative approach to HCI research. In P. Cairns & A. Cox (Eds.), Research methods for human-computer interaction (pp. 138–157). Cambridge: CU Press.
Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors. Transcript Verlag.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Buechley, L., & Perner-Wilson, H. (2012). Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. ACM TOCHI, 19, 21:1–21:21.
Dourish, P. (2003). The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Journal Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(4), 465–490.
Duncan, S. C. (2011). Minecraft, beyond construction and survival. Well Played, 1, 1–22.
Gardner, A. (2014). Oxfam teams with MyMiniFactory to provide humanitarian aid in Syria, using 3D printing. http://3dprint.com/3400/syrian-crisis-oxfam. Accessed January 10, 2015.
Gershenfeld, N. (2005). Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop—from personal computers to personal fabrication. New York: Basic Books.
Gershenfeld, N. (2012). How to make almost anything the digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Affairs, 91, 42–57.
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing.
Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
Ho, M. R., Smyth, T. N., Kam, M., & Dearden, A. (2009). Human-computer interaction for development: The past, present, and future. Information Technologies and International Development, 5, 1–18.
Kafai, Y. B., Peppler, K. A., & Chapman, R. N. (2009). The computer clubhouse: Constructionism and creativity in youth communities, technology, education-connections. New York: Teachers College.
Krassenstein, E. (2014). Man compares his $42k prosthetic hand to a $50 3D printed cyborg beast. http://3dprint.com/2438/50-prosthetic-3d-printed-hand. Accessed January 10, 2015.
Kuznetsov, S., & Paulos, E. (2010). Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. In Proceedings of NordiCHI (pp. 295–304).
Kuznetsov, S., Taylor, A. S., Regan, T., Villar, N., & Paulos, E. (2012). At the seams: DIYbio and opportunities for HCI. In Proceedings of DIS (pp. 258–267).
Lee, C. P. (2007). Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. In Proceedings of CSCW (Vol. 16, pp. 307–339).
Lindtner, S., Hertz, G., & Dourish, P. (2014). Emerging sites of HCI innovation: Hackerspaces, hardware startups and incubators. In Proceedings of CHI (pp. 1–10).
Ludwig, T., Stickel, O., & V. Pipek (2014b). 3D Printers as potential boundary negotiating artifacts for third places. In 2nd WS on HCI for 3rd Places at DIS’14. Canada: Vancouver.
Ludwig, T., Stickel, O., Boden, A., & Pipek, V. (2014a). Towards sociable technologies: An empirical study on designing appropriation infrastructures for 3D printing. In Proceedings of DIS (pp. 835–844).
McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.
Mellis, D. A., Buechley, L. (2012). Case studies in the personal fabrication of electronic products. In Proceedings of DIS (pp. 268–277). New York: ACM.
Mikhak, B., Lyon, C., Gorton, T., Gershenfeld, N., Mcennis, C., & Taylor, J. (2002). Fab lab: An alternate model of ICT for development. In Development by Design (DYD02) (pp. 1–7).
Moilanen, J., & T. Vadén (2013). 3D printing community and emerging practices of peer production. First Monday, 18(5).
Pipek, V. (2005). From tailoring to appropriation support: Negotiating groupware usage (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu, 2005).
Pipek, V., & Kahler, H. (2006). Supporting collaborative tailoring. In EUD (pp. 315–345).
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., et al. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. CACM, 52, 60–67.
Sawhney, N. (2009). Voices beyond walls: The role of digital storytelling for empowering marginalized youth in refugee camps. Voices (pp. 3–6).
Schubert, K., Weibert, A., & Wulf, V. (2011). Locating computer clubs in multicultural neighborhoods: How collaborative project work fosters integration processes. IJHCS, 69, 669–678.
Short, D., & Short, B. D. (2012). Teaching scientific concepts using a virtual world—Minecraft. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 58, 55–58.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387–420.
Stevens, G., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2009). Appropriation infrastructure: Supporting the design of usages. In Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on EUD (pp. 50–69).
Stevens, G., Veith, M., & Wulf, V. (2005). Bridging among ethnic communities by cross-cultural communities of practice. In Proceedings of C&T (pp. 377–396).
Tanenbaum, J. J. G., Williams, A. M., Desjardins, A., & Tanenbaum, K. (2013). Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proceedings of CHI (pp. 2603–2612).
Troxler, P. (2013). Making the third industrial revolution—the struggle for polycentric structures and a new peer-production commons in the FabLab community. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors.
von Hippel, E. (1988). Users as innovators. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
von Rekowski, T., Boden, A., Stickel, O., Hornung, D., & Stevens, G. (2014). Playful, collaborative approaches to 3D modeling and 3D printing. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer (pp. 363–366).
Weibert, A., Marshall, A., Aal, K., Schubert, K., & Rode, J. (2014). Sewing interest in E-textiles: Analyzing making from a gendered perspective. In Proceedings of DIS (pp. 15–24). New York: ACM.
Weibert, A., & Schubert, K. (2010). How the social structure of intercultural computer clubs fosters interactive storytelling. In Proceedings of IDC (pp. 368–371).
Willis, K. D. D., & Gross, M. D. (2011). Interactive fabrication: New interfaces for digital fabrication. In Proceedings of TEI (pp. 69–72).
Wulf, V., Aal, K., Abu Kteish, I., Atam, M., Schubert, K., Rohde, M., Yerousis, G. P., & Randall, D. (2013). Fighting against the wall. In Proceedings of CHI (pp. 1979–1988).
Wulf, V., Müller, C., Pipek, V., Randall, D., & Rohde, M. (2015). Practice-based computing. In V. Wulf, K. Schmidt, & D. Randall (Eds.), Designing socially embedded technologies in the real world. London: Springer.
Yerousis, G., Aal, K., Rekowski, T. V., Randall, D. W., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2015). Computer-enabled project spaces: Connecting with Palestinian refugees across camp boundaries. In Proceedings of CHI (pp. 1979–1988).
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to the volunteers and participants in Palestine, especially George Yerousis, Birzeit University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stickel, O., Hornung, D., Aal, K., Rohde, M., Wulf, V. (2015). 3D Printing with Marginalized Children—An Exploration in a Palestinian Refugee Camp. In: Boulus-Rødje, N., Ellingsen, G., Bratteteig, T., Aanestad, M., Bjørn, P. (eds) ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20498-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20499-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)