Skip to main content

Modeling and Simulation of Hearing with Cochlear Implants: A Proposed Method for Better Auralization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Computing Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 357))

  • 1046 Accesses

Abstract

Cochlear implants are the most successful and widespread bionic prosthetics to restore hearing of deaf people by electrically stimulation of intra-cochlear nerve tissues. Several stimulation strategies were developed to convert sound in electric stimuli aiming to give better hearing quality. To help the development of new stimulation strategies, hearing simulations (auralization methods) were developed to synthesize perceived sound from electric stimuli. Existing auralization approaches are based on the observations that the stimulation place and rate of the cochlear nerve tissues generate perceived sounds of different frequencies and amplitudes. Although, auralization results can give some insight on the hearing quality, they completely ignore the adaptation capability of the auditory cortex and therefore it can represent only the perceived hearing of newly implanted patients. This paper presents fundaments of natural hearing and artificial hearing through cochlear implant, analyzes two main auralization methods, and finally proposes a novel auralization method. In the proposed method, the neural nerve firing pattern evoked by electric stimulation is fed to an artificial neural network trained to output the frequency domain representation of the original sound given by the electric stimuli. Then, the obtained frequency domain representation is transformed back to time domain. The main desired advantages of the novel auralization method are: (i) more accurate approximation of the perceived sound, (ii) possibility to differentiate between the hearing experience of experienced patients and newly implanted patients, and (iii) significant time reducing of research and development for new/improved stimulation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wilson BS, Dorman MF (2008) Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear Res 242(1–2):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moctezuma A, Tu J (2011) An overview of cochlear implant systems. In: BIOE 414, University of Illinois, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi CTM, Lee Y-H (2012) A review of stimulating strategies for cochlear implants. In: Umat C (ed) Cochlear implant research updates. InTech, pp 77–89

    Google Scholar 

  4. Somek B, Fajt S, Dembitz A, Ivkovic M, Ostovic J (2006) Coding strategies for cochlear implants. Automatika 47(1–2):69–74

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schnupp J, Nelkel I, King A (2011) Auditory neuroscience: making sense of sound. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hochmair I, Nopp P, Jolly C, Schmidt M, Schößer H, Garnham C, Anderson I (2006) MED-EL cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future. Trends Amplif 10(4):201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harczos T, Chilian A, Husar P (2013) Making use of auditory models for better mimicking of normal hearing processes with cochlear implants: the SAM coding strategy. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 7(4):414–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nogueira W, Buechner A (2012) Conveying low frequency information through analog electrical stimulation in cochlear implants. In: Proceedings of 20th European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO 2012), Bucharest, Romania, pp 509–513

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen F, Zhang Y-t (2006) A new acoustic model incorporating temporal fine structure cue for cochlear implant. In: Proceedings of 5th International special topic conference on information technology in biomedicine (ITAB 200), Ioannina, Greece, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mahalakshmi P, Reddy MR (2012) Investigation of the envelope and phase information for improved speech perception using an acoustic simulation model for cochlear implants. In: Proceedings of IEEE International EMBS conference on biomedical engineering and sciences (IECBES 2012), Langkawi, Malaysia, pp 555–558

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chilian A, Braun E, Harczos T (2011) Acoustic simulation of cochlear implant hearing. In: Proceedings of 3rd International symposium on auditory and audiological research (ISAAR 2011)—speech perception and auditory disorders, Nyborg, Denmark, pp 425–432

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loebach JL (2007) Cochlear implant simulations: a tutorial on generating acoustic simulations for research. In: Progress report no. 28 in research on spoken language processing, Indiana University, pp 359–368

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT (2008) Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev 45(5):779–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang S, Xu L, Mannell R (2011) Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12(6):783–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meddis R, Lopez-Poveda EA (2010) Auditory periphery: from pinna to auditory nerve. In: Meddis R et al (ed) Computational models of the auditory system. Springer, pp 7–38

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez-Poveda EA, Eustaquio-Martin A (2006) A biophysical model of the inner hair cell: the contribution of potassium currents to peripheral auditory compression. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 7(3):218–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan Q, Carney LH (2003) A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: II. Nonlinear tuning with a frequency glide. J Acoust Soc Am 114(4):2007–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang X, Heinz MG, Bruce IC, Carney LH (2001) A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression. J Acoust Soc Am 109(2):648–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harczos T, Szepannek G, Katai A, Klefenz F (2006) An auditory model based vowel classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE biomedical circuits and systems conference (BioCAS 2006), London, pp 69–72

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nogueira W, Harczos T, Edler B, Ostermann J, Buchner A (2007) Automatic speech recognition with a cochlear implant front-end. In: Proceedings of 8th annual conference of the international speech communication association (INTERSPEECH 2007), Antwerp, Belgium, pp 2537–2540

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Kuczapski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuczapski, A.M., Andreescu, GD. (2016). Modeling and Simulation of Hearing with Cochlear Implants: A Proposed Method for Better Auralization. In: Balas, V., Jain, L., Kovačević, B. (eds) Soft Computing Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18416-6_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18416-6_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18415-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18416-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics