Skip to main content

Hyper-heuristic Operator Selection and Acceptance Criteria

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization (EvoCOP 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9026))

Abstract

Earlier research has shown that an adaptive hyper-heuristic can be a successful approach to solving combinatorial optimisation problems. By using a pairing of an operator (low-level heuristic) selection vector and a solution acceptance criterion, an adaptive hyper-heuristic can manage development of a “good” solution within an unseen low-level problem domain in a commercially realistic computational time. However not all selection vectors and solution acceptance criteria pairings deliver competitive results when faced with differing problem instance features and computational time limits. We evaluate pairings of six different operator selection vectors and eight solution acceptance criteria, and monitor the performance of the adaptive hyper-heuristic when applying each pairing to a set of Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem instances of the same size but with different features. The results show that a few pairings of operator selection vector and acceptance criterion perform consistently well, while others require a longer computational time to deliver competitive results. We also investigate some of the features of a problem instance that may influence the performance of the selection vector and acceptance criterion pairings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bai, R., Blazewicz, J., Burke, E., Kendall, G., McCollum, B.: A simulated annealing hyper-heuristic methodology for flexible decision support. 4OR Q. J. Oper. Res. 10(1), 43–66 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cowling, P., Kendall, G., Soubeiga, E.: A hyperheuristic approach to scheduling a sales summit. In: Burke, E., Erben, W. (eds.) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling III. LNCS, vol. 2079. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dueck, G.: New optimization heuristics: the great deluge algorithm and the record-to-record travel. J. Comput. Phys. 104(1), 86–92 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher, M.: Optimal solution of vehicle routing problems using minimum k-trees. Oper. Res. 42(4), 626–642 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Glover, F.: Tabu search: Part I. ORSA J. Comput. 1(3), 190–206 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Marshall, R.J., Johnston, M., Zhang, M.: A comparison between two evolutionary hyper-heuristics for combinatorial optimisation. In: Dick, G., Browne, W.N., Whigham, P., Zhang, M., Bui, L.T., Ishibuchi, H., Jin, Y., Li, X., Shi, Y., Singh, P., Tan, K.C., Tang, K. (eds.) SEAL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8886, pp. 618–630. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Misir, M., Verbeeck, K., De Causmaecker, P.: A new hyper-heuristic as a general problem solver: an implementation in HyFlex. J. Sched. 16, 291–311 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Ochoa, G., Hyde, M.: Cross-domain Heuristic Search Challenge (2011). http://www.asap.cs.nott.ac.uk/external/chesc2011/

  9. Ochoa, G., Hyde, M., Curtois, T., Vazquez-Rodriguez, J.A., Walker, J., Gendreau, M., Kendall, G., McCollum, B., Parkes, A.J., Petrovic, S., Burke, E.K.: HyFlex: a benchmark framework for cross-domain heuristic search. In: Hao, J.-K., Middendorf, M. (eds.) EvoCOP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7245, pp. 136–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Sabar, N., Ayob, M., Kendall, G., Qu, R.: Grammatical evolution hyper-heuristic for combinatorial optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 17(6), 840–861 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soubeiga, E.: Development and application of hyperheuristics to personnel scheduling. Ph.D thesis, University of Nottingham (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Toth, P., Vigo, D.: The Vehicle Routing Problem. SIAM. LNCS. Springer, Philadelphia (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Walker, J.D., Ochoa, G., Gendreau, M., Burke, E.K.: Vehicle routing and adaptive iterated local search within the HyFlex hyper-heuristic framework. In: Hamadi, Y., Schoenauer, M. (eds.) LION 2012. LNCS, vol. 7219, pp. 265–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Marshall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marshall, R.J., Johnston, M., Zhang, M. (2015). Hyper-heuristic Operator Selection and Acceptance Criteria. In: Ochoa, G., Chicano, F. (eds) Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization. EvoCOP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9026. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16468-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16468-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16467-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16468-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics