Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 120))

  • 375 Accesses

Abstract

I shall now present the conclusion to this study, bearing in mind the objectives set out in the Introduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See reproduction of manuscript, Figs. 2.1 and 2.2 in Chap. 2.

  2. 2.

    Having already tackled these issues in other studies, I made reference to the parallel doctrines of Conrad-Martius on individuation. For a treatment of this point the reader is referred to Alfieri F. (2010).

  3. 3.

    Stein E. (2008), p. 54. English translation, p. 38.

  4. 4.

    See De Monticelli R. (2006), p. 364.

  5. 5.

    See ibid.

  6. 6.

    With no wish to conduct a polemic, I would like to point out here that although it does cite Leibniz, De Monticelli’s analysis lacks any reference to Stein, which however at this point is essential. Given the “classical” nature of the theme of depth in Stein’s works, suitable references to her would perhaps have been more relevant than a comparison with authors such as van Inwagen and Baker, on whose “classical” nature history has yet to give its verdict. Furthermore, there is an evident close affinity between the concepts deployed by De Monticelli, including “depth” and the “hidden reality” of the soul (See ibid. p. 362), with the Steinian notions of ultima solitudo, interior castle (Seelenburg), depth of the soul, etc.

  7. 7.

    Ales Bello A. (2012), p. 38 (our translation).

References

  • Ales Bello, A. (2012). Status quaestionis. In A. Ales Bello & P. Manganaro (Eds.), … e la coscienza? Fenomenologia, Psico-patologia, Neuroscienze (Cerchi concentrici (III), pp. 13–39). Bari: Edizioni Giuseppe Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfieri, F. (2010). Il principio dell’individuazione nelle analisi fenomenologiche di Edith Stein e Hedwig Conrad-Martius. Il recupero della filosofia medievale. In A. Ales Bello, F. Alfieri, & M. Shahid (Eds.), Edith Stein e Hedwig Conrad-Martius. Fenomenologia Metafisica Scienze (pp. 143–197). Bari: Edizioni Giuseppe Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Monticelli, R. (2006). Persona e individualità essenziale. Un dialogo con Peter van Inwagen e Lynne Baker. In M. Cappuccio (Ed.), Neuro-fenomenologia. Le scienze della mente e la sfida del-l’esperienza cosciente (pp. 341–378). Milan: Paravia Bruno Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. (2008). Zum Problem der Einfühlung. Eingeführt und bearbeitet von M. A. Sondermann. ESGA (5). Freiburg/Basel/Wien: Herder. English edition: Stein, E. (1989). On the Problem of Empathy (trans: Stein, W.). The Collected Works of Edith Stein (III); Introduction to the third edition by M.C. Baseheart. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alfieri, F. (2015). Conclusion. In: The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein. Analecta Husserliana, vol 120. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15663-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics