Skip to main content

The Assessment and Selection of Hedge Funds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Business Analytics
  • 3699 Accesses

Abstract

The following Chapter intends to be a small guide to investing in hedge funds or a guide to take into account when trying to understand the complexities of investing in hedge funds. We aim to give a general overview of the field of alternative investments and to introduce its complexities, because investing in hedge funds is not at all a very simple task.

In this Chapter, we assess the challenges of analysing and selecting hedge funds. Alternative investment vehicles have taken an important role not only in the diversification of portfolios but also as standalone investments. Capturing the entire risk dimensions implied in hedge fund investment strategies is paramount in understanding alternative investments. We also analyse the problem of the lack of benchmarks. Should the performance of a hedge fund follow a benchmark? As absolute return vehicles, alternative investment organizations should not be benchmarked. However, investors need to compare returns with other assets in order to properly assess the cost of opportunity implied in hedge fund investing. We consider also benchmarking among peers as a new and latest strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. López Pascual J, Cuellar RD (2010) Assessment and selection of hedge funds and funds of hedge funds. Working Paper N 5 2010, Cunef

    Google Scholar 

  2. Waring MB, Siegel LB (2006) The myth of the absolute-return investor. Financ Anal J 62(2):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fung W, Hsieh DA (2001) The risk in hedge fund strategies: theory and evidence of trend follower. Rev Financ Stud 41:313–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kat HM (2005) Integrating hedge funds into the traditional portfolio. J Wealth Manage 7(4):51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brinson GP, Hood LR, Beebower GL (1986) Determinants of portfolio performance II: an update. Financ Anal J 42(4):35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brinson GP, Singer BD, Beebower GL (1991) Determinants of portfolio performance II: an update. Financ Anal J 47(3):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lintner J (1983) The potential role of managed commodity-financial futures accounts (and/or funds) in portfolios of stocks and bonds. Presentation at the Financial Analysts Federation

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rockefellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rockefellar RT, Uryasev S (2001) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Research Report 2001–2005. ISE Department, University of Florida

    Google Scholar 

  10. López Pascual J, Cuellar RDR (2007) The challenges of launching, rating, and regulating funds of hedge funds. J Derivatives Hedge Funds 13(3):247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lhabitant F-S (2004) Hedge funds: quantitative insights. John Willey & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey JV (1992) Are manager universes acceptable benchmarks? J Portfol Manage 18:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregoriou G, Zhu J (2005) Evaluating hedge fund and CTA performance, data envelopment analysis approach. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carpenter J (2000) Does option compensation increase managerial risk appetite? J Financ 21:2311–2331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross SA (2004) Compensation, incentives, and the duality of risk aversion and riskiness. J Financ 59:207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panageas S, Westerfield MM (2005) High-water marks: high risk appetites? Convex compensation, long horizons and portfolio choice. Working Paper 03–06, The Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  17. López Pascual J, Cuellar RD (2008) Can the hedge fund regulation limit the negative impact of a systemic crisis. Universia Bus Rev 20:42–53

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sirri E, Tuffano P (1992) The demand for mutual fund services by individual investors. Working Paper, Harvard Business School

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chevalier J, Ellison G (1995) Risk-taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. NBER Working Paper No. 5234

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goetzmann W, Ingersoll J Jr, Ross S (2003) High-water marks and hedge fund management contracts. J Financ LVIII(4):1685–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquin López Pascual .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pascual, J.L. (2015). The Assessment and Selection of Hedge Funds. In: García Márquez, F., Lev, B. (eds) Advanced Business Analytics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11415-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics