Skip to main content

Performance Effects of Positive and Negative Affective States in a Collaborative Information Seeking Task

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8658))

Abstract

Collaborative information seeking (CIS) is a common process carried out by groups in a wide variety of situations and contexts. From family activities to business tasks, people typically engage in collaborative search practices while working toward a common goal. In collaborative settings, various aspects of human behavior influence the way people interact with each other and make decisions. One of these aspects corresponds to emotions and related affective processes such as mood and feelings. Studies in social psychology have suggested that group dynamics and their performance may be affected by the interaction of affective processes, in particular positive and negative ones. Although such findings have been derived in different group situations, to the best of our knowledge none of them refer to the particular case of CIS. Based on previous studies, we investigate to what extent positive and negative affective states relate to group performance in CIS. To carry out this study, we designed an experiment with 45 dyads distributed in three configurations based on initial affective states: (1) positive-positive, (2) positive-negative, and (3) negative-negative. To achieve these initial conditions, members of each dyad were individually exposed to affective stimuli. Following, each dyad worked on a precision-oriented search task. Our results suggest that the three interactions of affective states have different implications on the performance of dyads. In particular, the negative-negative configuration performed significantly better than the other two configurations. Conversely, performance of the positive-negative condition was found to be significantly lower than the other two conditions. Findings from this work have practical implications for applications such as team design in tasks involving CIS.

The work reported here is supported by the US Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) Early Career Development Grant #RE-04-12-0105-12.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baeza-Yates, R., Pino, J.A.: A first step to formally evaluate collaborative work. In: ACM Group Conference, pp. 56–60. Phoenix, AR (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R.: The somatic marker hypothesis: A Neural Theory of Economic Decision. Games and Economic Behavior 52, 336–372 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E.: Grounding in communication. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, R.M., Teasley, S.D. (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127–149. The American Psychological Association (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coan, J.A., Allen, J.J.B. (eds.): Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forgas, J.P.: Affective influences on partner choice: Role of mood in social decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 708–720 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forgas, J.P.: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM): An integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. In: Martin, L.L., Clore, G.L. (eds.) Theories of Mood and Cognition: A User’s Guidebook, pp. 101–136. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., White, T.: Evaluating implicit measures to improve Web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 23(2), 147–168 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fredrickson, B.L., Losada, M.F.: The positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist 60(7), 678–686 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. González-Ibáñez, R., Shah, C.: Group’s Affective Relevance: A proposal for studying affective relevance in collaborative information seeking. In: ACM Group Conference, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, November 6-10, pp. 317–318 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. González-Ibáñez, R., Shah, C.: Coagmento: A system for supporting collaborative information seeking. In: ASIS&T 2011, New Orleans, LA, USA, October 9-13 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. González-Ibáñez, R., Shah, C.: Investigating positive and negative affects in collaborative information seeking: A pilot study report. In: ASIS&T 2012, Baltimore, MD, USA, October 26-30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. González-Ibáñez, R., Shah, C., White, R.: Pseudo-collaboration as a method to perform selective algorithmic mediation in collaborative IR systems. In: ASIS&T 2012, Baltimore, MD, USA, October 26-30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hyldegard, J.: Collaborative information behaviour - Exploring Kuhlthau’s information search process model in a group-based educational setting. In: Information Processing and Management, vol. 42(1), pp. 276–298. Pergamon Press, Inc., Tarrytown (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kent, A., Berry, M.M., Luehrs Jr., F.U., Perry, W.: Operational criteria for designing information retrieval systems. American Documentation 6(2) (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkland, M.R., Saunders, M.A.P.: Maximizing student performance in summary writing: Managing cognitive load. TESOL Quarterly 25(1), 105–121 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuhlthau, C.: Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5), 361–371 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Losada, M., Heaphy, E.: The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist 47(6), 740–765 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, M.: On the induction of mood. Clinical Psychology Review 10, 669–697 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Palmero, F., Guerrero, C., Gómez, C., Carpi, A.: Certezas y controversia en el estudio de la emoción. Revista electrónica de motivación y emoción (R.E.M.E) 9, 23–24 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC2001. Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sinclair, R.C., Mark, M.M.: The effects of mood state on judgemental accuracy: Processing strategy as a mechanism. Cognition and Emotion 9(5), 417–438 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah, C.: Collaborative information seeking: A literature review. Advances in Librarianship 32, 3–33 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah, C.: Coagmento - A collaborative information seeking, synthesis and sense-making framework. Integrated demo at CSCW 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shah, C., González-Ibáñez, R.: Exploring information seeking processes in collaborative search tasks. In: American Society of Information Science and Technology (ASIST), Pittsburgh, PA, October 22-27 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shah, C., González-Ibáñez, R.: Evaluating the synergic effect of collaboration in information seeking. In: Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2011), Beijing, China, pp. 913–922 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tang, A., Pahud, M., Inkpen, K., Benko, H., Tang, J.C., Buxton, V.: Three’s company: Understanding communication channels in three-way distributed collaboration. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6), 1063–1070 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson, M.L., Wilson, M.: Social anxieties and collaborative information seeking. In: Collaborative Information Seeking Workshop at GROUP 2010, Sanibel Island, FL, USA (November 7, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. White, R.W., Huang, J.: Assessing the scenic route: Measuring the value of search trails in Web logs. In: Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), Geneva, Switzerland (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

González-Ibáñez, R., Shah, C. (2014). Performance Effects of Positive and Negative Affective States in a Collaborative Information Seeking Task. In: Baloian, N., Burstein, F., Ogata, H., Santoro, F., Zurita, G. (eds) Collaboration and Technology. CRIWG 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8658. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10166-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10166-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10165-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10166-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics