Abstract
The rapid advances in microfabrication and nanofabrication in combination with the synthesis and discovery of new materials have propelled the drive to develop new technological devices such as smartphones, personal and tablet computers. These devices have changed the way humankind interacts and communicates and this change occurred very quickly due in part to decreased production and commercialization costs. As a result, not only nations with powerful economies but also emerging economies and poor countries can get access to these technologies and experience new ways to interact and instantly communicate what is happening around us. Following the advances of all these communication devices as well as those in microfabrication and nanofabrication and the emergence of new materials, technologies such as lab-on-a-chip (LOC) and micro total analysis systems (microTAS) were also boosted, albeit at a slower pace. LOC and microTAS applications have principally been utilized in the biomedical, food and environmental fields. But lately they have also found their place in the synthesis of new chemical compounds and the fabrication of nanostructures. It has become obvious that the LOC and microTAS technologies need to join forces with those behind the new communication devices which provide sources of power, detection and data transmission complementing the features that lab-on-a-chip and microTAS platforms can offer. An increasing number of microfluidic-based devices, developed both in small start-ups and large pharmaceutical and biomedical companies, is being released and entering the market. This chapter offers an overview of the first events in the history of LOC and microTAS devices, the biggest achievements and the challenges that still need to be overcome in order to accelerate the use of this technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Araci IE, Brisk P (2014) Recent developments in microfluidic large scale integration. Curr Opin Biotechnol 25:60–68
Bassous E, Taub HH, Kuhn L (1977) Ink jet printing nozzle arrays etched in silicon. Appl Phys Lett 31:135–137
Brock DC (2011) A measure of success. Chem Herit Mag 29(1)
Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK (2012) Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 12:2118–2134
Choi K, Ng AHC, Fobel R, Wheeler AR (2012) Digital microfluidics. Ann Rev Anal Chem 5:413–440
Duffy DC, McDonald C, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984
Gazzaniga V (1999) Uroporphyria: some notes on its ancient historical background. Am J Nephrol 19:159–162
Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86:3240–3253
Harrison DJ, Flury K, Seiler K, Fan Z, Effenhauser CS, Manz A (1993) Micromachining a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis based chemical analysis system on a chip. Science 261:895–897
Kim SM, Lee SH, Suh KY (2008) Cell research with phisically modified microfluidic channels: a review. Lab Chip 8:1015–1023
Kitson PJ, Rosnes MH, Sans V, Dragone V, Cronin L (2012) Configurable 3D-printed millifluidic and microfluidic “lab on a chip” reactionware devices. Lab Chip 12:3267–3271
Kouba E, Wallen E, Pruthi RS (2007) Uroscopy by Hippocrates and Theophilus: prognosis versus diagnosis. J Urol 177:50–52
Lee A (2013) The third decade of microfluidics. Lab Chip 13:1660–1661
Mark D, von Stetten F, Zengerle R (2012) Microfluidic Apps for off-the-shelf instruments. Lab Chip 12:2464–2468
Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Butte MJ, Whitesides GM (2007) Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays. Angew Chem 119:1340–1342
Moraes C, Labuz JM, Leung BM, Inoue M, Chun T, Takayama S (2013) On being the right size: scaling effects in designing a human-on-a-chip. Integr Biol 5(9):1149–1161
Pollack MG, Fair RB, Shenderov AD (2000) Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications. Appl Phys Lett 77:1725–1726
Tasoglu S, Gurkan UA, Wang S, Demirci U (2013) Manipulating biological agents and cells in micro-scale volumes for applications in medicine. Chem Soc Rev 42:5788–5808
van der Meer AD, van den Berg A (2012) Organs-on-chips: breaking the in vitro impasse. Integr Biol 4:461–470
Wallis F (2000) Inventing diagnosis: Theophilus’ De urinis in the classroom. Acta Hips Med Sci Hist Illus 20:31–73
Wittern-Sterzel R (2000) Diagnosis: the doctor and the urine glass. Lancet 354:SIV13
Xia Y, Whitesides GM (1998) Soft lithography. Annu Rev Mater Sci 28:153–184
Yetisen AK, Akram MS, Lowe CR (2013) Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 13:2210–2251
Yetisen AK, Martinez-Hurtado JL, da Cruz VF, Simsekler MCE, Akram MS, Lowe CR (2014) The regulation of mobile medical applications. Lab Chip 14:833–840
Young EWK (2013) Cells, tissues, and organs on chips: challenges and opportunities for the cancer tumor microenvironment. Integr Biol 5:1096–1109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castillo-León, J. (2015). Microfluidics and Lab-on-a-Chip Devices: History and Challenges. In: Castillo-León, J., Svendsen, W. (eds) Lab-on-a-Chip Devices and Micro-Total Analysis Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08687-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08687-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08686-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08687-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)