Skip to main content

Microfluidics and Lab-on-a-Chip Devices: History and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lab-on-a-Chip Devices and Micro-Total Analysis Systems

Abstract

The rapid advances in microfabrication and nanofabrication in combination with the synthesis and discovery of new materials have propelled the drive to develop new technological devices such as smartphones, personal and tablet computers. These devices have changed the way humankind interacts and communicates and this change occurred very quickly due in part to decreased production and commercialization costs. As a result, not only nations with powerful economies but also emerging economies and poor countries can get access to these technologies and experience new ways to interact and instantly communicate what is happening around us. Following the advances of all these communication devices as well as those in microfabrication and nanofabrication and the emergence of new materials, technologies such as lab-on-a-chip (LOC) and micro total analysis systems (microTAS) were also boosted, albeit at a slower pace. LOC and microTAS applications have principally been utilized in the biomedical, food and environmental fields. But lately they have also found their place in the synthesis of new chemical compounds and the fabrication of nanostructures. It has become obvious that the LOC and microTAS technologies need to join forces with those behind the new communication devices which provide sources of power, detection and data transmission complementing the features that lab-on-a-chip and microTAS platforms can offer. An increasing number of microfluidic-based devices, developed both in small start-ups and large pharmaceutical and biomedical companies, is being released and entering the market. This chapter offers an overview of the first events in the history of LOC and microTAS devices, the biggest achievements and the challenges that still need to be overcome in order to accelerate the use of this technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Araci IE, Brisk P (2014) Recent developments in microfluidic large scale integration. Curr Opin Biotechnol 25:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassous E, Taub HH, Kuhn L (1977) Ink jet printing nozzle arrays etched in silicon. Appl Phys Lett 31:135–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock DC (2011) A measure of success. Chem Herit Mag 29(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK (2012) Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 12:2118–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi K, Ng AHC, Fobel R, Wheeler AR (2012) Digital microfluidics. Ann Rev Anal Chem 5:413–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy DC, McDonald C, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga V (1999) Uroporphyria: some notes on its ancient historical background. Am J Nephrol 19:159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86:3240–3253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison DJ, Flury K, Seiler K, Fan Z, Effenhauser CS, Manz A (1993) Micromachining a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis based chemical analysis system on a chip. Science 261:895–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SM, Lee SH, Suh KY (2008) Cell research with phisically modified microfluidic channels: a review. Lab Chip 8:1015–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitson PJ, Rosnes MH, Sans V, Dragone V, Cronin L (2012) Configurable 3D-printed millifluidic and microfluidic “lab on a chip” reactionware devices. Lab Chip 12:3267–3271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba E, Wallen E, Pruthi RS (2007) Uroscopy by Hippocrates and Theophilus: prognosis versus diagnosis. J Urol 177:50–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee A (2013) The third decade of microfluidics. Lab Chip 13:1660–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark D, von Stetten F, Zengerle R (2012) Microfluidic Apps for off-the-shelf instruments. Lab Chip 12:2464–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Butte MJ, Whitesides GM (2007) Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays. Angew Chem 119:1340–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes C, Labuz JM, Leung BM, Inoue M, Chun T, Takayama S (2013) On being the right size: scaling effects in designing a human-on-a-chip. Integr Biol 5(9):1149–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack MG, Fair RB, Shenderov AD (2000) Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications. Appl Phys Lett 77:1725–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasoglu S, Gurkan UA, Wang S, Demirci U (2013) Manipulating biological agents and cells in micro-scale volumes for applications in medicine. Chem Soc Rev 42:5788–5808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer AD, van den Berg A (2012) Organs-on-chips: breaking the in vitro impasse. Integr Biol 4:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis F (2000) Inventing diagnosis: Theophilus’ De urinis in the classroom. Acta Hips Med Sci Hist Illus 20:31–73

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wittern-Sterzel R (2000) Diagnosis: the doctor and the urine glass. Lancet 354:SIV13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia Y, Whitesides GM (1998) Soft lithography. Annu Rev Mater Sci 28:153–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetisen AK, Akram MS, Lowe CR (2013) Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 13:2210–2251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetisen AK, Martinez-Hurtado JL, da Cruz VF, Simsekler MCE, Akram MS, Lowe CR (2014) The regulation of mobile medical applications. Lab Chip 14:833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young EWK (2013) Cells, tissues, and organs on chips: challenges and opportunities for the cancer tumor microenvironment. Integr Biol 5:1096–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Castillo-León .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Castillo-León, J. (2015). Microfluidics and Lab-on-a-Chip Devices: History and Challenges. In: Castillo-León, J., Svendsen, W. (eds) Lab-on-a-Chip Devices and Micro-Total Analysis Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08687-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08687-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08686-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08687-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics