Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Symposium on Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium

PETS 2014: Privacy Enhancing Technologies pp 83–101Cite as

Social Status and the Demand for Security and Privacy

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8555))

Abstract

High-status decision makers are often in a position to make choices with security and privacy relevance not only for themselves but also for groups, or even society at-large. For example, decisions about security technology investments, anti-terrorism activities, and domestic security, broadly shape the balance between security and privacy. However, it is unclear to what extent the mass of individuals share the same concerns as high-status individuals. In particular, it is unexplored in the academic literature whether an individual’s status position shapes one’s security and privacy concerns.

The method of investigation used is experimental, with 146 subjects interacting in high- or low-status assignments and the subsequent change in the demand for security and privacy being related to status assignment with a significant t-statistic up to 2.9, depending on the specification. We find that a high-status assignment significantly increases security concerns. This effect is observable for two predefined sub-dimensions of security (i.e., personal and societal concerns) as well as for the composite measure. We find only weak support for an increase in the demand for privacy with a low-status manipulation.

We complement these results with a second experiment on individuals’ time preferences with 120 participants. We show that the high-status manipulation is correlated with increased patience, i.e., those individuals exhibit more robust long-term appreciation of decisions. Given that many security and privacy decisions have long-term implications and delayed consequences, our results suggest that high-status decision makers are less likely to procrastinate on important security investments, and are more likely to account for future risks appropriately. The opposite applies to privacy and low-status roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, M., Cranor, L., Reagle, J.: Privacy in e-commerce: Examining user scenarios and privacy preferences. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 1999), pp. 1–8 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J.: Privacy attitudes and privacy behavior: Losses, gains, and hyperbolic discounting. In: Camp, J., Lewis, S. (eds.) The Economics of Information Security, pp. 165–178. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J.: Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security & Privacy 3(1), 26–33 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anandpara, V., Dingman, A., Jakobsson, M., Liu, D., Roinestad, H.: Phishing IQ tests measure fear, not ability. In: Dietrich, S., Dhamija, R. (eds.) FC 2007 and USEC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4886, pp. 362–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, C., Berdahl, J.: The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 1362–1377 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barradale, N.: Social incentives and human evolution, Available at SSRN, Paper No. 1520206 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barradale, N.: Essays in Social Status and Finance. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bilgin, P.: Individual and societal dimensions of security. International Studies Review 5(2), 203–222 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A.: The economics of privacy. In: Peitz, M., Waldvogel, J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy, pp. 547–571. Oxford University Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chabris, C., Laibson, D., Morris, C., Schuldt, J., Taubinsky, D.: Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 37, 237–269 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, X., Ender, P., Mitchell, M., Wells, C.: Regression with Stata. Stata Web Books (2003), http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/webbooks/reg/default.htm

  12. Clarke, R., Morell, M., Stone, G., Sunstein, C., Swire, P.: Liberty and security in a changing world: Report and recommendations of The Presidents Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies (December 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davies, S.: When privacy reform gets as dirty as environmental reform, we’re all in trouble. The Privacy Surgeon (June 2013), Blog article available at http://www.privacysurgeon.org/

  14. Dhamija, R., Tygar, J., Hearst, M.: Why phishing works. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006), pp. 581–590 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Drakos, K., Müller, C.: Terrorism risk concern in Europe. Economics Letters 112(2), 195–197 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischbacher, U.: z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10(2), 171–178 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T.: Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40, 351–401 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghafurian, M., Reitter, D.: Impatience, risk propensity and rationality in timing games. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., Rustichini, A.: Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(3), 1049–1074 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Good, N., Dhamija, R., Grossklags, J., Aronovitz, S., Thaw, D., Mulligan, D., Konstan, J.: Stopping spyware at the gate: A user study of privacy, notice and spyware. In: Proceedings of the Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2005), pp. 43–52 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grossklags, J.: Experimental economics and experimental computer science: A survey. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Experimental Computer Science (ExpCS 2007) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grossklags, J., Acquisti, A.: When 25 cents is too much: An experiment on willingness-to-sell and willingness-to-protect personal information. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Economics of Information Security (WEIS 2007) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hall, J., Carter, J., Horgan, T.: Status roles and recall of nonverbal cues. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25, 79–100 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Henrich, J., Heine, S., Norenzayan, A.: The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2-3), 61–83 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huber, P.: The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 221–233 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huberman, B., Adar, E., Fine, L.: Valuating privacy. IEEE Security & Privacy 3(5), 22–25 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hui, K., Png, I.: Economics of privacy. In: Hendershott, T. (ed.) Handbook of Information Systems and Economics, pp. 471–497. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jagatic, T., Johnson, N., Jakobsson, M., Menczer, F.: Social phishing. Communications of the ACM 50(10), 94–100 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, M., Bickel, W.: Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 77, 129–146 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kachelmeier, S., Shehata, M.: Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People’s Republic of China. American Economic Review 82, 1120–1141 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kirby, K., Petry, N., Bickel, W.: Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology 128, 78–87 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumaraguru, P., Cranor, L.: Privacy indexes: A survey of Westin’s studies, Available as ISRI Technical Report CMU-ISRI-05-138 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Levitt, S., List, J.: What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2), 153–174 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Madden, G., Raiff, B., Lagorio, C., Begotka, A., Mueller, A., Hehli, D., Wegener, A.: Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 12, 251–261 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. NCSA/Norton (National Cyber Security Alliance and Norton by Symantec). 2010 NCSA/Norton by Symantec Online Safety Study (2010), http://www.staysafeonline.org/

  36. Ortmann, A., Hertwig, R.: The costs of deception: Evidence from psychology. Experimental Economics 5(2), 111–131 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Reimers, S., Maylor, E., Stewart, N., Chater, N.: Associations between a one-shot delay discounting measure and age, income, education and real-world impulsive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences 47(8), 973–978 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Reynolds, B.: A review of delay-discounting research with humans: Relations to drug use and gambling. Behavioural Pharmacology 17, 651–667 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson, N., Potoglou, D., Kim, C., Burge, P., Warnes, R.: Security, at what cost? Quantifying people’s trade-offs across liberty, privacy and security (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schiff, J., Meingast, M., Mulligan, D., Sastry, S., Goldberg, K.: Respectful cameras: Detecting visual markers in real-time to address privacy concerns. In: Senior, A. (ed.) Protecting Privacy in Video Surveillance, pp. 65–89. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Smith, V.: Economics in the laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1), 154–158 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Snodgrass, S.: Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62, 154–158 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Solove, D.: “I’ve got nothing to hide” and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Review 44, 745–772 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Solove, D.: Understanding Privacy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Solove, D.: Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security. Yale University Press, New Haven (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., Berendt, B.: E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce: Privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 2001), pp. 38–47 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Thaler, R.: Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. San Diego Law Review 8, 201–207 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tsai, J., Egelman, S., Cranor, L., Acquisti, A.: The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Information Systems Research 22(2), 254–268 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Watts, D.: Everything is obvious: How common sense fails us. Crown Business, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Webster, M.: Working on status puzzles. In: Thye, S., Skvoretz, J. (eds.) Advances in Group Processes, pp. 173–215. Elsevier Ltd. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Westin, A.: Privacy and freedom. Atheneum, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  52. White, H.: A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4), 817–838 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. White, J., Moffitt, T., Caspi, A., Bartusch, D., Needles, D., Stouthamer-Loeber, M.: Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 103, 192–205 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wojciszke, B., Struzynska-Kujalowicz, A.: Power influences self-esteem. Social Cognition 25, 472–494 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Youn, S., Lee, M.: The determinants of online security concerns and their influence on e-transactions. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising 5(3), 194–222 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, USA

    Jens Grossklags

  2. Department of Finance, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

    Nigel J. Barradale

Authors
  1. Jens Grossklags
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nigel J. Barradale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK

    Emiliano De Cristofaro

  2. Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, CB3 0FD, Cambridge, UK

    Steven J. Murdoch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grossklags, J., Barradale, N.J. (2014). Social Status and the Demand for Security and Privacy. In: De Cristofaro, E., Murdoch, S.J. (eds) Privacy Enhancing Technologies. PETS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8555. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08506-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08506-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08505-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08506-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation