Skip to main content

Search Interfaces for Mathematicians

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8543))

Abstract

Access to mathematical knowledge has changed dramatically in recent years, therefore changing mathematical search practices. Our aim with this study is to scrutinize professional mathematicians’ search behavior. With this understanding we want to be able to reason why mathematicians use which tool for what search problem in what phase of the search process. To gain these insights we conducted 24 repertory grid interviews with mathematically inclined people (ranging from senior professional mathematicians to non-mathematicians). From the interview data we elicited patterns for the user group “mathematicians” that can be applied when understanding design issues or creating new designs for mathematical search interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, C.M.: Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists in the Electronic Information Age: Astronomers, Chemists, Mathematicians, and Physicists. JASIS 50(10), 929–943 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gower, J.: Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40, 33–51 (1975) ISSN: 0033-3123

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grice, J.W.: Idiogrid: Software for the management and analysis of repertory grids. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 338–341 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hassenzahl, M., Wessler, R.: Capturing Design Space From a User Perspective: The Repertory Grid Technique Revisited. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 3rd ser. 12, 441–459 (2000) ISSN: 1044-7318

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heidecker, S., Hassenzahl, M.: Eine gruppenspezifische Repertory Grid Analyse der wahrgenommenen Attraktivität von Universitätswebsites. In: Gross, T. (ed.) Mensch & Computer, pp. 129–138. Oldenbourg Verlag (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hertzum, M., Clemmensen, T.: How do usability professionals construe usability? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 70(1), 26–42 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jankowicz, D.: The Easy Guide to Repertory Grids. Wiley (2003) ISBN: 0470854049

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kellar, M., Watters, C.R., Shepherd, M.A.: A field study characterizing Web-based information-seeking tasks. JASIST 58(7), 999–1018 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly, G.: A Brief Introduction to Personal Construct Theory. In: International Handbook of Personal Construct Technology, pp. 3–20. John Wiley & Sons (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kitchen, T.: The European Digital Mathematics Library: Usability Study, https://wiki.eudml.eu/eudml-w/images/D6.1.pdf (visited on March 14, 2014)

  11. Kohlhase, A.: Framings of Information: Readers’ Perception of Information Sources in Spreadsheets. Tech. rep. 30. Jacobs University (March 2013), kwarc.info/ako/pubs/tr_hsi_2013.pdf

  12. Kohlhase, A.: Human-Spreadsheet Interaction. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 571–578. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhlthau, C.C., Heinström, J., Todd, R.J.: The information search process revisited: is the model still useful? IR Information Research 13(4) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Seeking meaning. A process approach to library and information services, 2nd edn., XVII, 247 p. Libraries Unlimited (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives S.). Cambridge University Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Libbrecht, P.: Escaping the Trap of Too Precise Topic Queries. In: Carette, J., Aspinall, D., Lange, C., Sojka, P., Windsteiger, W. (eds.) CICM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7961, pp. 296–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2013), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1010

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC) SKOS (2012), http://msc2010.org/resources/MSC/2010/info/ (visited on August 31, 2012)

  18. McLuhan, M.: Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (Critical Edition), edited by W. Terrence Gordon. Gingko Press, Corte Madera (1964) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morville, P., Callender, J.: Search Patterns: Design for Discovery. O’Reilly Media (2010) ISBN: 9781449383060

    Google Scholar 

  20. Navarro-Prieto, R., Scaife, M., Rogers, Y.: Cognitive strategies in web searching. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Human Factors & the Web (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. OpenRepGrid.org, http://www.openrepgrid.org (visited on March 14, 2014)

  22. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence — A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Shneiderman, B., Byrd, D., Croft, W.B.: Clarifying Search: A User-Interface Framework for Text Searches (1997) ISSN: 1082-9873

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tan, F.B., Gordon Hunter, M.: The Repertory Grid Technique: A Method for the Study of Cognition in Information Systems. English. MIS Quarterly 26(1), 39–57 (2002) ISSN: 02767783

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor, R.S.: The process of Asking Questions. American Documentation 13(4), 391–396 (1962), doi:10.1002/asi.5090130405

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wise, K., Kim, H.J., Kim, J.: The effect of searching versus surfing on cognitive and emotional responses to online news. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 21(2), 49–59 (2009), doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.2.49

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, J., Kan, M.-Y., Theng, Y.L.: Math Information Retrieval: User Requirements and Prototype Implementation. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2008, pp. 187–196. ACM, Pittsburgh (2008) ISBN: 978-1-59593-998-2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kohlhase, A. (2014). Search Interfaces for Mathematicians. In: Watt, S.M., Davenport, J.H., Sexton, A.P., Sojka, P., Urban, J. (eds) Intelligent Computer Mathematics. CICM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8543. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08434-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08434-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08433-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08434-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics