Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Machine Medical Ethics pp 151–166Cite as

The Rights of Machines: Caring for Robotic Care-Givers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 74))

Abstract

Work in the field of machine medical ethics, especially as it applies to healthcare robots, generally focuses attention on controlling the decision making capabilities and actions of autonomous machines for the sake of respecting the rights of human beings. Absent from much of the current literature is a consideration of the other side of this issue. That is, the question of machine rights or the moral standing of these socially situated and interactive technologies. This chapter investigates the moral situation of healthcare robots by examining how human beings should respond to these artificial entities that will increasingly come to care for us. A range of possible responses will be considered bounded by two opposing positions. We can, on the one hand, deal with these mechanisms by deploying the standard instrumental theory of technology, which renders care-giving robots nothing more than tools and therefore something we do not really need to care about. Or we can, on the other hand, treat these machines as domestic companions that occupy the place of another person in social relationships, becoming someone we increasingly need to care about. Unfortunately neither option is entirely satisfactory, and it is the objective of this chapter not to argue for one or the other but to formulate the opportunities and challenges of ethics in the era of robotic caregivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson M, Anderson SL, Armen C (2004). Toward machine ethics. In: American association for artificial intelligence. http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2004/WS-04-02/WS04-02-008.pdf

  2. Anderson M, Anderson SL (2006) Machine ethics. IEEE Intell Syst 21(4):10–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson M, Anderson SL (2011) Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson SL (2008) Asimov’s “three laws of robotics” and machine metaethics. AI Soc 22(4):477–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartneck C, van der Hoek M, Mubin O, Al Mahmud A (2007) Daisy, daisy, give me your answer do! Switching off a robot. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, Washington, DC, pp 217–222

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bates J (1994) The role of emotion in believable agents. Commun ACM 37:122–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bentham J (2005) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In: Burns JH, Hart HL (eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Birch T (1993) Moral considerability and universal consideration. Environ Ethics 15:313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blumberg B, Todd P, Maes M (1996) No bad dogs: ethological lessons for learning. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior (SAB96). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  10. Breazeal C, Brooks R (2004) Robot emotion: a functional perspective. In: Fellous JM, Arbib M (eds) Who needs emotions: the brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 271–310

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks R (2002) Flesh and machines: how robots will change us. Pantheon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bryson J (2010) Robots Should be Slaves. In: Wilks Y (ed) Close engagements with artificial companions: key social, psychological, ethical and design issues. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 63–74

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borenstein J, Pearson Y (2012) Robot caregivers: ethical issues across the human lifespan. In: Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (eds) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 251–265

    Google Scholar 

  14. Camus A (1983) The myth of Sisyphus, and other essays (trans: O’Brien J). Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cerqui D, Arras KO (2001) Human beings and robots: towards a symbiosis? In: Carrasquero J (ed) Post-conference proceedings PISTA 03 on a 2000 people survey (Politics and information systems: technologies and applications), pp 408–413

    Google Scholar 

  16. Churchland PM (1999) Matter and consciousness (revised edition). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coeckelbergh M (2010) Healthcare, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theor Moral Pract 13:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coeckelbergh M (2010) Moral appearances: emotions, robots, and human morality. Ethics Inf Technol 12(3):235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Coeckelbergh M (2012) Growing moral relations: critique of moral status ascription. Palgrave MacMillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Coelho S (2013) Dolphins gain unprecedented protection in India. Deutsche Welle. http://dw.de/p/18dQV

  21. Coleman KG (2001) Android arete: toward a virtue ethic for computational agents. Ethics Inf Technol 3:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dennett DC (1998) Brainstorms: philosophical essays on mind and psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Derrida J (2008) The animal that I therefore am (trans: Wills D). Fordham University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Descartes R (1988) Selected philosophical writings (trans: Cottingham J, Stoothoff R, Murdoch D). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ess, C (1996) The political computer: democracy, cmc, and habermas. In: Ess, C, (ed) Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication. SUNY Press, Albany, NY, pp 197-232.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Floridi L, Sanders JW (2004) On the morality of artificial agents. Minds Mach 14:349–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. French P (1979) The corporation as a moral person. Am Philos Q 16(3):207–215

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Gunkel DJ (2012) The machine question: critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Güzeldere G (1997) The many faces of consciousness: a field guide. In: Block N, Flanagan O, Güzeldere G (eds) The nature of consciousness: philosophical debates. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1–68

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hall JS (2011) Ethics for machines. In: Anderson M, Anderson SL (eds) Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 28–44

    Google Scholar 

  31. Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology and other essays (trans: Lovitt W). Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Himma KE (2009) Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: what properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent?”. Ethics Inf Technol 11(1):19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hubbard FP (2011) “Do androids dream?” Personhood and intelligent artifacts. Temple Law Rev 83:101–170

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ikäheimo H, Laitinen A (2007) Dimensions of personhood: editors’ introduction. J Conscious Stud 14(5–6):6–16

    Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson DG (2006) Computer systems: moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics Inf Technol 8:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kadlac A (2009) Humanizing personhood. Ethical Theor Moral Pract 13(4):421–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kokoro LTD (2009). http://www.kokoro-dreams.co.jp/

  38. Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Levinas E (1969) Totality and infinity: an essay on exteriority (trans: Lingis A). Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  40. Levy D (2008) Robots unlimited: life in virtual age. A K Peters, Wellesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

  41. Locke J (1996) An essay concerning human understanding. Hackett, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moravec H (1988) Mind children: the future of robot and human intelligence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  43. Peterson S (2012) Designing people to serve. In: Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (eds) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 282–298

    Google Scholar 

  44. Putnam H (1964) Robots: machines or artificially created life? J Philos 61(21):668–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Regan T (1983) The case for animal rights. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  46. Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  47. Scott RL (1967) On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Cent States Speech J 18:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharkey N, Sharkey A (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sharkey N, Sharkey A (2012) The rights and wrongs of robot care. In: Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (eds) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 267–282

    Google Scholar 

  50. Singer P (1975) Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York Review Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. Singer P (1999) Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  52. Smith C (2010) What is a person? Rethinking humanity, social life, and the moral good from the person up. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2010) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind Mach 16:141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Stone CD (1972) Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. South Calif Law Rev 44:450–492

    Google Scholar 

  55. Torrance S (2008) Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents. AI Soc 22:495–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Velásquez JD (1998) When robots weep: emotional memories and decision-making. In: Proceedings of AAAI-98. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  57. Velmans M (2000) Understanding consciousness. Routledge, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  58. Wallach W, Allen C (2009) Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Whitbey B (2008) Sometimes it’s hard to be a robot: a call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents. Interact Comput 20(3):326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wiener N (1954) The human use of human beings. Da Capo, New York

    Google Scholar 

  61. Winnograd T (1990) Thinking machines: can there be? Are we?”. In: Partridge D, Wilks Y (eds) The foundations of artificial intelligence: a sourcebook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 167–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  62. Žižek S (2000) The fragile absolute or, why is the Christian legacy worth fighting for?. Verso, New York

    Google Scholar 

  63. Žižek S (2003) The puppet and the dwarf: the perverse core of Christianity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  64. Žižek S (2006) The parallax view. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA

    David J. Gunkel

Authors
  1. David J. Gunkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Gunkel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Taipei Medical University, University of Tasmania, Dept of philosophy, Schl of Humanities, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Simon Peter van Rysewyk

  2. The Centre for Advanced Media Research, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Matthijs Pontier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gunkel, D.J. (2015). The Rights of Machines: Caring for Robotic Care-Givers. In: van Rysewyk, S., Pontier, M. (eds) Machine Medical Ethics. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 74. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08107-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08108-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation