Abstract
Gait Trainer (GT) and the Lokomat (Loko) are two commercial robotic devices developed for assist task-oriented, intensive practice of walking in neurological patients. Despite the many studies involving these devices, there are not specific studies comparing electromyography (EMG) activity during sessions of walking training performed using these devices. This study aimed to explore the differences in the EMG patterns between these two devices and in respect over-ground walking. EMG of eight lower limb muscles were bilaterally recorded and analyzed in one healthy subject. Thigh muscles were more active during GT-session, whereas shank muscles during Loko-session. Furthermore, decreasing the guidance assistance of Loko (i.e. the percentage of force applied by the robot in respect to that needed for following the predetermined trajectory, training), all the muscles showed an increment of the EMG signal. These results showed clear differences in muscle activation patterns between the two systems and, as expected, quite different from the pattern observed in over-ground locomotion. These results are of importance for the correct use of robotic devices in gait rehabilitation and would represent the preliminary step to address their correct use in neurologically impaired subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Masiero, S., Poli, P., Rosati, G., Zanotto, D., Iosa, M., Paolucci, S., Morone, G.: The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation. Expert Rev. Med. Devices (January 30, 2014)
Iosa, M., Morone, G., Fusco, A., Bragoni, M., Coiro, P., Multari, M., Venturiero, V., De Angelis, D., Pratesi, L., Paolucci, S.: Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res. Treat. 2012, 187965 (2012)
Mayr, A., Kofler, M., Quirbach, E., Matzak, H., Fröhlich, K., Saltuari, L.: Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 21, 307–311 (2007)
Wirz, M., Zemon, D.H., Rupp, R., et al.: Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 672–680 (2005)
Hesse, S., Werner, C., Bardeleben, A.: Electromechanical gait training with functional electrical stimulation: case studies in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 42, 346–352 (2004)
Morone, G., Bragoni, M., Iosa, M., De Angelis, D., Venturiero, V., Coiro, P., Pratesi, L., Paolucci, S.: Who benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 25(7), 636–644 (2011)
Hesse, S., Uhlenbrock, D., Sarkodie-Gyan, T.: Gait pattern of severely disabled hemiparetic subjects on a new controlled gait trainer as compared to assisted treadmill walking with partial body weight support. Clin. Rehabil. 13(5), 401–410 (1999)
Gizzi, L., Nielsen, J.F., Felici, F., Moreno, J.C., Pons, J.L., Farina, D.: Motor modules in robot-aided walking. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 9, 76 (2012), doi:10.1186/1743-0003-9-76
Regnaux, J.P., Saremi, K., Marehbian, J., Bussel, B., Dobkin, B.H.: An accelerometry-based comparison of 2 robotic assistive devices for treadmill training of gait. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 22(4), 348–354 (2008)
Oliveira, A.S., Gizzi, L., Kersting, U.G., Farina, D.: Modular organization of balance control following perturbations during walking. J. Neurophysiol. 108, 1895–1906 (2012)
Iosa, M., Morone, G., Bragoni, M., De Angelis, D., Venturiero, V., Coiro, P., Pratesi, L., Paolucci, S.: Driving electromechanically assisted Gait Trainer for people with stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48, 135–146 (2011)
Moreno, J.C., Barroso, F., Farina, D., Gizzi, L., Santos, C., Molinari, M., Pons, J.L.: Effects of robotic guidance on the coordination of locomotion. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 10, 79 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Morone, G. et al. (2014). An EMG Pattern Comparison of Exoskeleton vs. End-Effector Robotic Device for Assisted Walking Training. In: Jensen, W., Andersen, O., Akay, M. (eds) Replace, Repair, Restore, Relieve – Bridging Clinical and Engineering Solutions in Neurorehabilitation. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08072-7_82
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08072-7_82
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08071-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08072-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)