Abstract
In this paper, the influence of Audio Sampling Rate (ASR) and Frame Loss Rate (FLR) on perceived Quality of Experience (QoE) was studied. The result indicated that users are very sensitive to the damaged auditory quality caused by frame loss at 8 kHz and 12 kHz no matter how much it losses. The perceived damage of auditory quality caused by frame loss at 16 kHz and 24 kHz is also much lower that at 8 kHz and 12 kHz. Users even failed to perceive the negative impact of frame loss on auditory quality at 32 kHz whatever the frame loss rate is. The interaction effect indicates that users are not so sensitive to the negative impact of frame loss when the sampling rates increase to 16 kHz or higher.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Janssens, J., Vandaele, S., Beken, T.V.: The Music Industry on (the) Line? Surviving Music Piracy in a Digital Era. European Journal of Crime 77(96) (2009)
Wikipedia , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_audio
Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_rate
Frequency Range of Human Hearing,
Shepherd, I.: Are high sample rates making your music sound worse?, http://productionadvice.co.uk/high-sample-rates-make-your-music-sound-worse/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Qin, X. (2014). The Measurement of Perceived Quality of Various Audio. In: Harris, D. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. EPCE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8532. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07515-0_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07515-0_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07514-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07515-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)