Skip to main content

ERP-End-User Training Through E-Learning: What Should the User Focus On?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 8))

Abstract

End-user training (EUT) plays an important role in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations and successful operations. Nowadays, most EUT is conducted with the support of digital media. In this study we investigated the impact of the amount of time spent by learners on different content types, namely media enriched text and video screenings, on acquired factual and conceptual knowledge as well as acquired skills concerning the ERP system. Findings show that more is not categorically better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Iansiti, M., Sarnoff, D., & Favaloro, G. (2006). Enterprise IT Capabilities and Business Performance. Keystone strategy inc. Report, http://www.keystonestrategy.com/wp-content/themes/keystone-theme/publications/pdf/Enterprise_IT.pdf

  2. Leyh, C., Winkelmann, A., & Lu, J. (2011). Exploring the diversity of ERP systems—an empirical insight into system usage in academia. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Detroit, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mediengruppe, K. (2011). Einsatz von ERP-Lösungen in der Industrie. Leinfelden Echterdingen.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freifeld, L. (2012). 2012 TRAINING Industry report. Trains magazine, 49, 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scott, J., & Walczak, S. (2009). Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Information and Management, 46, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Umble, E. J., Haft, R. R., & Umble, M. M. (2003). Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146, 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Noguera, J. H., & Watson, E. F. (2004). Effectiveness of using an enterprise system to teach process-centered concepts in business education. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17, 56–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkham, K., & Seymour, L. (2005). The value of teaching using a live ERP System with resource constraints. World Conference on Computers in Education. Stellenbosch, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, S., & Bostrom, R. P. (2006). End-user training methods: what we know, need to know. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: Forty four years of computer personnel research: achievements, challenges and the future. (pp. 172–182). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paa, L., & Ates, N. (2013). Critical success factors of e-learning scenarios for ERP end-user training. In F. Piazolo & Felderer, M. (Eds.), Innovation and Future of Enterprise Information Systems. (pp. 87–100). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paa, L., Ebner, M., Piazolo, F., & Ates, N. (2012). Rechnet sich Blended Learning an Hochschulen ? Eine ökonomische Betrachtung von e-Learning Maßnahmen. In J. Desel, J. M. Haake & C. Spannagel (Eds.), DeLFI 2012: Die 10. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik. (pp. 267–278). Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., & Furst, E. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Practice, 41, 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Imrie, B. (1995). Assessment for learning: quality and taxonomies. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(2), 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas Paa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paa, L., Piazolo, F. (2014). ERP-End-User Training Through E-Learning: What Should the User Focus On?. In: Piazolo, F., Felderer, M. (eds) Novel Methods and Technologies for Enterprise Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07055-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics