Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

When Medical Expertise Meets Record Expertise: The Practices of Patient Accessible Medical Records in China

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
COOP 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 27-30 May 2014, Nice (France)

Abstract

Recent consumer, private sector, and governmental health informatics initiatives outline patient accessible medical records (PAMR) as key for engaging patients and supporting patient-clinician communication. However, many challenges have been encountered in designing usable digital systems for patients to access and use their medical records. Barriers to such systems include social, cultural, and policy constraints in addition to usability problems. In particular, questions of expertise, responsibility, and ownership surrounding medical records are often hotly contested between medical professionals and healthcare organizations. In broaching the design challenge of PAMR, much can be learned from examining existing practices for patient carried and accessible records in contexts where these practices are well established. We examine practices surrounding PAMR in a setting where medical records have long been managed by patients: the Chinese healthcare system. Through close examination of managing medical records and sharing medical health information, we find that these personal record practices in China enable a two-way medical records sharing practice between patients and their providers, which fundamentally reconfigures the patient role in healthcare process, facilitates development of ‘record expertise’ on the part of patients, and joint responsibility for health management. We use these findings to illuminate the potential benefits of PAMR, and to offer design considerations to optimize future systems design and deployment efforts in other contexts.

The two authors contributed equally to this work and are listed in alphabetical order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wiljer D, Urowitz S et al (2008) Patient accessible electronic health records: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies. J Med Internet Res 10(4):e34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. (2004) Markle foundation. Working group on policies for electronic information sharing between doctors and patients: final report: connecting Americans to their healthcare

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ (2006) Personal health records: definition, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. JAMIA 13(2):121–126

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss M (1997) For doctors ‘eyes only: medical records in two Israeli hospitals. Cult Med Psychiatry 21(3):283–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Piras EM, Zanutto A (2010) Prescriptions, x-rays, and grocery lists: designing a personal health record to support (the invisible work of) health information management in the household. CSCW 19:585–613

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kahn J, Aulakh V, Bosworth A (2009) What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Aff 28(2):369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. (2011) InformationWeek. 5 reasons why GoogleHealth failed. Accessed online at http://www.informationweek.com/healthcare/electronic-health-records/5-reasons-why-google-health-failed/d/d-id/1098623? 29 Jun 2011

  8. Tang PC (2003) Key capabilities of an electronic health record system. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu LS, Shih PC, Hayes GR (2011) Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, pp 363–370

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leonard KJ, Casselman M, Wiljer D (2008) Who will demand access to their personal health record? A focus on users of health services and what they want. Healthc Q 11(1):92–96

    Google Scholar 

  11. Unruh KT, Pratt W (2007) Patients as actors: the patient’s role in detecting, preventing, and recovering from medical errors. Int J Med Inf 76(S1):S236–S244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cimino JJ, Patel VL et al (2002) The patient clinical information system (PatCIS): technical solutions for and experience with giving patients access to their electronic medical records. Int J Med Inf 68:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein EJ, Furedy RL et al (1979) Patient access to medical records on a psychiatric inpatient unit. Am J Psychiartry 136:327–329

    Google Scholar 

  14. Earnest MA, Ross SE et al (2004) Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inf Assoc 11:410–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Staroselsky M, Volk LA et al (2006) Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input. Int J Med Inf 75(10):693–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Urowitz S, Wiljer D, Apatu E, Eysenbach G, Delenardo C, Harth T, Pai H, Leonard KJ (2008) Is Canada ready for patient accessible electronic health records? A national scan. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 8(1):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ross AP (1986) The case against showing patients their records. Brit Med J (Clin Res Ed) 292(6520):578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wald JS, Middleton B, Bloom A, Walmsley D, Gleason M, Nelson E, Li Q, Epstein M, Volk L, Bates DW (2004) A patient-controlled journal for an electronic medical record: issues and challenges. Stud Health Technol Inf 107(Pt 2):1166–1170

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ross SE et al (2003) The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review. J Am Med Inf Assoc JAMIA 10(2):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Consolvo S, Roessler P, Shelton BE, LaMarca A, Schilit B, Bly S (2004) Technology for care networks of elders. IEEE Pervasive Comput 3(2):22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lundberg N, Tellioğlu H (1999) Understanding complex coordination processes in health care. Scand J Inf Syst 1(2):157–181

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mejia DA, Morán AL, Favela J (2007) Supporting informal co-located collaboration in hospital work. In: Groupware: design, implementation, and use, pp 255–270

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Y, Ngo V, Park SY (2013) Caring for caregivers: designing for integrality. CSCW 2013:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jordan B (1993) Birth in four cultures: a cross cultural investigation of childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden, and the United States. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  27. Giddens A (1986) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt K (2011) Cooperative work and coordinative practices. Springer, London, pp 3–27

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theor 5(2):243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (2011) Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Nicolini D (2012) Practice theory, work, and organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  32. Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, USA

    Yunan Chen

  2. Intel Labs, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA

    Kathleen Pine

Authors
  1. Yunan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen Pine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Pine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Kista, Sweden

    Chiara Rossitto

  2. Sheffield Hallam University C3RI, Sheffield, United Kingdom

    Luigina Ciolfi

  3. Xerox Research Centre Europe, Meylan, France

    David Martin

  4. Sociology and Ethnology, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France

    Bernard Conein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, Y., Pine, K. (2014). When Medical Expertise Meets Record Expertise: The Practices of Patient Accessible Medical Records in China. In: Rossitto, C., Ciolfi, L., Martin, D., Conein, B. (eds) COOP 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 27-30 May 2014, Nice (France). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06497-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06498-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation