Skip to main content

Abstract

Communities present considerable challenges for the design and application of supportive information technology (IT), especially in loosely-integrated and informal contexts, as it is often the case of Communities of Practice (CoP). An approach that actively supports user communities in the process of IT appropriation can help alleviate the impossibility of their members to rely on continuous professional support, and even enable complex forms of cooperative tailoring of their artifacts. The paper discusses the property of the accountability of IT applications as one of the basic enabling conditions for the appropriation of the technologies by their end-users, and for its most mature and sustainable form, that is End-User Development (EUD). We illustrate a framework, called Logic of Bricolage (LOB), proposed to both end-users and interested designers to describe (and make accountable) their EUD environments and systems, and facilitate both local appropriation and the sharing of experiences of IT adoption in CoPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.jboss.org/drools/

  2. 2.

    This task is less detailed than in the other two cases as the mentioned paper does not give all the necessary details.

References

  1. Ardito C, Buono P, Costabile MF, Lanzilotti R, Piccinno A (2012) End users as co-designers of their own tools and products. JVLC 23(2):78–90

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowers J, Button G, Sharrock W (1995) Workflow from within and without: technology and cooperative work on the print industry shopfloor. In: ECSCW’95. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51–66

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bodker S (2006) When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. ACM Press, New York, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cabitza F, Simone C (2010) WOAD: a framework to enable the end-user development of coordination oriented functionalities. JOEUC 22(2):1–20 (IGI Global)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cabitza F, Simone C (2012) Affording mechanisms: an integrated view of coordination and knowledge management. CSCW 21(2):227–260

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cabitza F, Simone C (2014) Building socially embedded technologies: implications on design. In: Designing socially embedded technologies. Springer (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cabitza F, Simone C, Sarini M (2009) Leveraging coordinative conventions to promote collaboration awareness. CSCW 18(4):301–330

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cabitza F, Simone C, Locatelli MP (2012) Supporting artifact-mediated discourses through a recursive annotation tool. In GROUP '12: Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 253–262

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cabitza F, Fogli D, Piccinno A (2014) “Each to his own”: distinguishing activities, roles and artifacts in EUD practices. In: Empowering society through digital innovations, LNISO. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cappiello C, Daniel F, Matera M, Picozzi M, Weiss M (2011) Enabling end user development through mashups: requirements, abstractions and innovation toolkits. LNCS, vol 6654, Springer, Berlin, pp 9–24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll JM, Kellogg WA, Rosson MB (1991) The task-artifact cycle. In: Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 74–102

    Google Scholar 

  12. Costabile MF, Fogli D, Mussio P, Piccinno A (2007) Visual interactive systems for end-user development: a model-based design methodology. Trans Syst Man Cybern 37(6). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dourish P (2003) The appropriation of interactive technologies: some lessons from placeless documents. CSCW 12:465–490

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer G, Scharff E (2000) Meta-design: design for designers. In: DIS’00 ACM, New York, pp 396–405

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gasser L (1986) The integration of computing and routine work. ACM TOIS 4(3):205–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Halverson C, Ackerman M, Erickson T, Kellogg WA (eds) (2008) Resources, co-evolution and artifacts: theory in CSCW. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Handel MJ, Poltrock S (2011) Working around official applications: experiences from a large engineering project. In: CSCW’11: ACM, pp 309–312

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lanzara G (1999) Between transient constructs and persistent structures: designing systems in action. J Strateg Inf Syst 8:331–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Locatelli MP, Simone C (2012) End-users’ integration of applications and devices: a cooperation based approach. In: From research to practice in the design of cooperative systems: results and open challenges. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–181

    Google Scholar 

  21. Myers BA, Pane JF, Ko A (2004) Natural programming languages and environments. Commun ACM 47(9):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Orr J (1996) Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job. Cornell University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pipek V, Kahler H (2006) Supporting collaborative tailoring. In: End user development, vol 9. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pipek V, Rosson MB, Stevens G, Wulf V (2009) Supporting the appropriation of ICT: end-user development in civil societies. In: Learning in communities. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–27

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Syrjaenen AL, Kuutti K (2011) From technology to domain. ACM Press, New York, pp 244–251

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Won M, Stiemerling O, Wulf V (2006) Component-based approaches to tailorable systems. In: End user development, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, pp 115–141

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Cabitza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cabitza, F., Simone, C. (2014). “Through the Glassy Box”: Supporting Appropriation in User Communities. In: Rossitto, C., Ciolfi, L., Martin, D., Conein, B. (eds) COOP 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 27-30 May 2014, Nice (France). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06497-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06498-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics