Skip to main content

Performance Measurement of Higher Education Information System Using IT Balanced Scorecard

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8397))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Extensive research was conducted at a private university in Indonesia into the performance of the higher education information system, called SIPERTI. The IT Balanced Scorecard framework consisting of its four perspectives: Corporate Contribution, User Orientation, Operational Excellence, and Future Orientation was employed to assess the system. The study was accomplished in the form of a questionnaire composed of five-point Likert scale statements. The questionnaire was addressed to the members of the faculties and staff of the university who used SIPERTI in their everyday work. The data obtained was statistically analysed including the tests of reliability and validity. A structured interview which followed the questionnaire allowed for the formulation of recommendations on SIPERTI performance improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–79 (January-February 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 134–142 (September-October 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 75–85 (January-February 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The balanced scorecard: Translating vision into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balanced Scorecard Institute, http://balancedscorecard.org/Resources/AbouttheBalancedScorecard/tabid/55/ (accessed December 30, 2013)

  6. Van Grembergen, W., Van Bruggen, R.: Measuring and improving corporate information technology through the balanced scorecard technique. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on the Evaluation of Information Technology, Deflt, pp. 163–171 (October 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S.: The Balanced Scorecard and IT Governance. Information Systems Control Journal 2 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Grembergen, W., Saull, R., De Haes, S.: Linking the IT balanced scorecard to the business objectives at a major Canadian financial group. Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications 5(1TY-JOUR) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S.: Measuring and Improving IT Governance Through the Balanced Scorecard. Information Systems Control Journal 2 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saull, R.: The IT Balanced Scorecard: A Roadmap to Effective Governance of Shared IT Organization. Information Systems Control Journal 2 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keyes, J.: Implementing the IT Balanced Scorecard: Aligning IT with Corporate Strategy. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Cram, A.: The IT Balanced Scorecard Revisited. Information Systems Control Journal 3 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martinsons, M., Davison, R., Tse, D.: The balanced scorecard: A foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems 25, 71–88 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, D.J., Yue, K.-B., Al-Mubaid, H., Hall, S.P., Abeysekera, K.: Assessing Information Systems and Computer Information Systems Programs from a Balanced Scorecard Perspective. Journal of Information Systems Education 23(2), 177 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., Györy, A., Cleven, A.: Finding Balanced Scorecards for Business Driven IT Service Portfolio Management: A Literature Review. International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance 3(1), 63–78 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosemann, M., Wiese, J.: Measuring the Performance of ERP Software – A Balanced Scorecard Approach. In: Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 773–784 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chand, D., Hachey, G., Hunton, J., Owhoso, V., Vasudevan, S.: A balanced scorecard based framework for assessing the strategic impacts of ERP systems. Computers in Industry 56(6), 558–572 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, H.-Y., Hsu, P.-Y., Ting, P.-H.: ERP Systems Success: An Integration of IS Success Model and Balanced Scorecard. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology 38(3), 215–228 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kronbichler, S.A., Ostermann, H., Staudinger, R.: A Comparison of ERP-Success Measurement Approaches. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management 7(2), 281–310 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Batada, I., Rahman, A.: Measuring System Performance & User Satisfaction after Implementation of ERP. In: Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE), pp. 603–611 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maria, E., Fibriani, C., Sinatra, L.: The Measurement of Information Technology Performance in Indonesian Higher Education Institutions in the Context of Achieving Institution Business Goals Using Cobit Framework Version 4.1 (Case Study: Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga). Researchers World – Journal of Arts Science & Commerce 3:3(3), 9–19 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kettunen, J., Kantola, I.: Management information system based on the balanced scorecard. Campus-Wide Information Systems 22(5), 263–274 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Likert, R.: A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology (140) (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ray, M.N., Houston, T.K., Yu, F.B., Menachemi, N., Maisiak, R.S., Allison, J.J., Berner, E.S.: Development and Testing of a Scale to Assess Physician Attitudes about Handheld Computers with Decision Support. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13(5), 567–572 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong, M.S., Nishimoto, H., Philip, G.: The Use of Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) in Evaluating Japan’s E-government Services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 6(2), 17–30 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta, D.: Impact of Computer Based Information Systems on Organisation Performance in Videocon Ltd. Research Cell: An International Journal of Engineering Sciences 8, 36–43 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Suzar, J.A.S.: End-user satisfaction with the Integrated System of the Federal Government Financial Administration (SIAFI): A case study. JJISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management 10(1), 145–160 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boulianne, E.: Empirical Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of Balanced Scorecard Measures and Dimensions. In: Epstein, M.J., Lee, J.Y. (eds.) Advances in Management Accounting, vol. 15, pp. 127–142. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sekaran, U., Bougie, R.: Research Methods for Business, 5th edn. John Willey & Sons Ltd., West Sussex (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nunnaly, J.: Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gliem, J.A., Gliem, R.R.: Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, pp. 82–88 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Santos, J.R.A.: Cronbach’s Alpha: A Tool for Assessing the Reliability of Scales. Journal of Extension 37(2) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Afriliana, N., Gaol, F.L. (2014). Performance Measurement of Higher Education Information System Using IT Balanced Scorecard. In: Nguyen, N.T., Attachoo, B., Trawiński, B., Somboonviwat, K. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8397. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05476-6_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05476-6_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05475-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05476-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics