Skip to main content

Abstract

Longevity risk plays a central role in the insurance company management since only careful assumptions about future evolution of mortality phenomenon allows the company to correctly front its future obligations. According to Solvency II longevity risk represents a sub-module of the underwriting risk module in the regulatory standard formula. In this paper we examine the adequacy of the shock’s structure suggested by the standard formula studying its impact on the solvency capital requirements and liabilities at different ages. In particular, we propose an alternative to the regulatory standard model represented by a flexible internal model. The innovative approach hinges on a stochastic volatility model and a so-called coherent risk measure as the expected shortfall. An empirical analysis is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Borger, M.: Deterministic shock vs. stochastic value-at-risk: an analysis of the solvency II standard model approach to longevity risk. Blätter DGVFM 31, 225–259 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouma, S.: Risk Management in the Insurance Industry and Solvency II. Capgemini Compliance and Risk Management Centre of Excellence (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. CEIOPS, QIS 5, Technical Specifications (2010). https://eiopa.europa.eu/consultations/qis/quantitative-impact-study-5/technical-specifications/index.html

  4. Cox, J.C., Ingersoll, J.E., Ross, S.: A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53(2), 385–407 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. IAIS, International Association of Insurance Supervisors: global reinsurance. Market Report (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Olivieri, A., Pitacco, E.: Solvency requirements for life annuity: some comparisons. G. Ist. Ital. Attuari LXXI(1–2), 59–82 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schobel, R., Zhu, J.W.: Stochastic volatility with an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process: an extension. Eur. Finance Rev. 3, 23–46 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stein, J., Stein, E., Price, S.: Distributions with stochastic volatility: an analytic approach. Rev. Financ. Stud. 4, 727–752 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariarosaria Coppola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coppola, M., D’Amato, V. (2014). The Solvency Capital Requirement Management for an Insurance Company. In: Perna, C., Sibillo, M. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05014-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics