Skip to main content

The Discussion or Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 23k Accesses

Abstract

Phil had reached the discussion chapter of his thesis, and we were talking about how he might shape it. The aim of his PhD project was to determine whether agricultural forestry could make a worthwhile contribution to the rehabilitation of degraded tropical uplands. He had spent a year on field research in Sri Lanka and, in the end, carried out two major research programs: a comparative study of existing land uses, and an economic analysis of a particular agroforestry system sponsored by a German aid agency. He had written chapters of his thesis describing the results of these studies, as well as the appropriate background chapters, but now found himself in trouble trying to pull it all together. Luckily, he had followed some earlier advice to keep his introduction and conclusion in alignment. I asked him whether he knew what the overall conclusions of his research project were. ‘More or less’, he replied. ‘Enough to write them all down?’ He hesitated, but ‘yes’ was the eventual answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Randall was another example of a kind of research personality I mentioned earlier, with a reluctance to bring work to that final point where it could be refereed or examined; to complete something. In some students this is a striving for an unnecessary perfection or completeness—for example, a perception that because the work has opened up new questions then it is unfinished.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Zobel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans†, D., Gruba, P., Zobel, J. (2014). The Discussion or Interpretation. In: How to Write a Better Thesis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04286-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04286-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04285-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04286-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics