Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relating Soil Carbon and Soil Structure to Land Use Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soil Carbon

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

Livestock products from grass contributed €24 billion to the Irish economy in 2011. Mismanagement due to pressure to intensify production results in soil quality deterioration and reduced productivity. This study assessed soil C content (0–10 cm) over a range of land use management from 20 arable crop farms and 20 grassland farms in Ireland. Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS) was used to score (Sq) each field. The average Sq score was 2.15 for arable land and 2.24 for grassland, with no significant difference between land uses. However, fields under minimum tillage had a significant lower Sq (better soil structure) than fields under conventional tillage. Under grassland management, an increase of Sq (decrease in soil structural quality) with intensification of management was found (R2 = 0.7). The soil C ranged from 15 to 53 g C kg−1 soil under tillage management and from 37 to 104 g C kg−1 soil under grassland. It indicates a greater capacity of C storage under grassland. There was a negative correlation between Sq and soil C both under arable and grassland (lower C content with decreased quality). The results indicated that soil management was largely sustainable in term of soil structure (Sq score), but if management intensity increases, many farms could decrease their soil quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abiven S, Menasseri S, Chenu C (2009) The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability – a literature analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Azooz RH (1999) Components of surface soil structure under conventional and no-tillage in northwestern Canada. Soil Tillage Res 53:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askari MS, Cui J, Holden NM (2013) The visual evaluation of soil structure under arable management. Soil Tillage Res 134:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball BC, Douglas JT (2003) A simple procedure for assessing soil structural, rooting and surface conditions. Soil Use Manag 19:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball BC, Batey T, Munkholm LJ (2007) Field assessment of soil structural quality- a development of the Peerlkamp test. Soil Use Manag 23:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron VS, Mapfumo E, Dick AC, Naeth MA, Okine EK, Chanasyk DS (2002) Grazing intensity impacts on pasture carbon and nitrogen flow. J Range Manag 55:535–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell LW, Kirkegaard JA, Swan A, Hunt JR, Huth NI, Fettell NA (2011) Impacts of soil damage by grazing livestock on crop productivity. Soil Tillage Res 113:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya R, Prakash V, Kundu S, Gupta HS (2006) Effect of tillage and crop rotations on pore size distribution and soil hydraulic conductivity in sandy clay loam soil of the Indian Himalayas. Soil Tillage Res 86:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, Agronomy 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivenge P, Vanlauwe B, Gentile R, Six J (2011) Organic resource quality influences short-term aggregate dynamics and soil organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation. Soil Biol Biochem 43:657–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dexer AR (2004) Soil physical quality Part 1. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120: 201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott ET (1986) Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:627–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Or D (ed) (2002) Particle size analysis. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 4: physical methods. Number 5 in the Soil Science Society of America Book Series. SSSA, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães RML, Ball BC, Tormena CA (2011) Improvements in the visual evaluation of soil structure. Soil Use Manag 27:395–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo LB, Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Glob Chang Biol 8:345–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassink J (1992) Effects of soil texture and structure on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils. Biol Fertil Soils 14:126–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltbrunner D, Schulze S, Hagedorn F, Schmidt MWI, Zimmmermann S (2012) Cattle trampling alters soil properties and changes soil microbial communities in a Swiss sub-alpine pasture. Geoderma 170:369–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karami A, Homaee M, Afzalinia S, Ruhipour H, Basirat S (2012) Organic resource management: impacts on soil aggregate stability and other soil physico-chemical properties. Agric Ecosyst Environ 148:22–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kodešová R, Jirků V, Kodeš V, Mühlhanselová M, Nikodem A, Žigová A (2011) Soil structure and soil hydraulic properties of Haplic Luvisol used as arable land and grassland. Soil Tillage Res 111:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty S, Commins P, Walsh JA (1999) Irish agriculture in transition : a census atlas of agriculture in the Republic of Ireland, Dublin, Teagasc in association with Department of Geography, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co., Kildare

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2002) Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environ Pollut 116:353–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lalor STJ, Coulter BS, Quinlan G, Connolly L (2010) A survey of fertilizer use in Ireland from 2004–2008 for grassland and arable crops. Teagasc, Johnstown Castle Environment Research Centre, Wexford, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry D, Bridge BJ, Radford BJ (2000) Contrasting soil physical properties after zero and traditional tillage of an alluvial soil in the semi-arid subtropics. Soil Tillage Res 53:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L, Kay BD, Hu C, Li Y, Schindler U, Behrendt A, Shepherd TG, Ball BC (2009a) Visual assessment of soil structure: evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany: part I: comparing visual methods and linking them with soil physical data and grain yield of cereals. Soil Tillage Res 103:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L, Kay BD, Deen B, Hu C, Zhang Y, Wolff M, Eulenstein F, Schindler U (2009b) Visual assessment of soil structure: part II. Implications of tillage, rotation and traffic on sites in Canada, China and Germany. Soil Tillage Res 103:188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L, Shepherd G, Schindler U, Ball BC, Munkholm LJ, Hennings V, Smolentseva E, Rukhovic O, Lukin S, Hu C (2013) Evaluation of soil structure in the framework of an overall soil quality rating. Soil Tillage Res 127:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munkholm LJ, Schjønning P, Rüegg K (2005) Mitigation of subsoil recompaction by light traffic and on-land ploughing: I. Soil response. Soil Tillage Res 80:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien SL, Jastrow JD (2013) Physical and chemical protection in hierarchical soil aggregates regulates soil carbon and nitrogen recovery in restored perennial grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 61:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peerlkamp PK (1959) A visual method of soil structure evaluation. Meded. v.d. Landbouwhogeschool en Opzoekingsstations van de Staat te Gent. XXIV(24):216–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert JM, Suzuki LEAS, Reinert DJ, Horn R, Håkansson I (2009) Reference bulk density and critical degree-of-compactness for no-till crop production in subtropical highly weathered soils. Soil Tillage Res 102:242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2008) Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamic. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soane BD, Ball BC, Arvidsson J, Basch G, Moreno F, Roger-Estrade J (2012) No-till in northern, western and south-western Europe: a review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil Tillage Res 118:66–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart WM, Dibb DW, Johnston AE, Smyth TJ (2005) The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron J 97:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syswerda SP, Corbin AT, Mokma DL, Kravchenko AN, Robertson GP (2011) Agricultural management and soil carbon storage in surface vs deep layers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:92–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toenshoff C, Joergensen RG, Stuelpnagel R, Wachendorf C (2013) Dynamics of soil organic carbon fractions one year after the re-conversion of poplar and willow plantations to arable use and perennial grassland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 174:21–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vyn TJ, Raimbult BA (1993) Long-term effect of five tillage systems on corn response and soil structure. Agron J 85:1074–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren SD, Nevill MB, Blackburn WH, Garza NE (1986) Soil response to trampling under intensive rotation grazing. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1336–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts CW, Dexter AR (1998) Soil friability: theory, measurement and the effects of management and organic carbon content. Eur J Soil Sci 49:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCD School of Biosystems Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland

    Junfang Cui

  2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Junfang Cui

  3. UCD School of Biosystems Engineering, University College Dublin, Room 318, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland

    Mohammad Sadegh Askari & Nicholas M. Holden

Authors
  1. Junfang Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Sadegh Askari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicholas M. Holden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junfang Cui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Alfred E. Hartemink

  2. Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Kevin McSweeney

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cui, J., Askari, M.S., Holden, N.M. (2014). Relating Soil Carbon and Soil Structure to Land Use Management. In: Hartemink, A., McSweeney, K. (eds) Soil Carbon. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04084-4_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation