Skip to main content

Implement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1142 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology ((BRIEFSECT))

Abstract

In the ADDIE model, implementation is the actual launch and daily workings of interventions planned and produced through the design process. The implementation phase usually involves communicating plans to learners, planning the logistics of instruction, and preparing the support for learners, instructors and any other key personnel involved in the educational process (Larson and Lockee, Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design, Routledge, New York, NY, 2014). Implementation tasks for building a community of practice include facilitation, trust building, member recruitment, and ongoing training. This chapter will explore the many tasks required for an effective launch and execution of a thriving community of practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2002). Virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice at caterpillar: Success factors and barriers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(3), 94–113. doi:10.1111/j.19378327.2002.tb00258.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 269–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzillo, S., Aznar, S., & Schmitt, A. (2011). A journey through communities of practice: How and why members move from the periphery to the core. European Management Journal, 29(1), 25–42. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2010.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chih-Hsiung, T., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, V., & Bostrom, R. (1996). Research-driven facilitation training for computer supported environments. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5(1), 7–29. doi:10.1007/BF02404174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, L., Parkes, K. A., Tilley-Lubbs, G. A., Brill, J. M., & Pitts Bannister, V. R. (2009). Navigating the lonely sea: Peer mentoring and collaboration among aspiring women scholars. Mentoring & Tutoring for Partnership in Learning, 17(1), 5–21. doi:10.1080/13611260802699532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. (1998). Using Lotus notes learning space for staff development in public schools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(3–4), 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gongla, P., & Rizzuto, C. R. (2001). Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 842–862. doi:10.1147/sj.404.0842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemp, P. (2009). Death by information overload. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., & Wright, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1985). Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Communication of the ACM, 28(7), 680–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), 1–36. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00080.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26(5), 335–347. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharratt, M., & Usoro, A. (2003). Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & Walsh, M. (1999). Paradigm shift: Toward a community-university community of practice. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(3), 244–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2009). Criteria for evaluating synchronous learning Management systems: Arguments from the distance language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/09588220802613773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice a guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, T., Hable, M., Preston, M., & Magliaro, S. (2000). Faculty student groups: Solving “good problems” through study, reflection, and collaboration. Innovative Higher Education, 24, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., & Bishop, M. J. (2011). Understanding and supporting online communities of practice: Lessons learned from Wikipedia. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 711–735. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9204-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bond, M.A., Lockee, B.B. (2014). Implement. In: Building Virtual Communities of Practice for Distance Educators. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03626-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics