Skip to main content

What Is the Design Alchemy Pedagogy ?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Alchemy

Part of the book series: Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations ((ECTII,volume 8))

  • 1328 Accesses

Abstract

Over the decades many different concepts and strategies have been considered appropriate for education—experiential, motivational and problem based—and other factors have also impacted on design practice such as learning styles, culture and generation. This chapter focuses on the informing theories of Design Alchemy, which is both integrative and eclectic and provides a theoretical and evidence-based foundation for practicing as a design alchemist. While acknowledging that traditionally pedagogy refers specifically to the art of teaching, in this context the design alchemist also needs a pedagogy, a theoretically sound framework, on which to base design decisions that will enhance the experience of both learner and teacher. The elements which make up this pedagogy are based on an inclusive learner-centred philosophy which integrate learning activities, contextual learning, problem-solving, social learning, creative learning and emergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Retrieved September 8, 2013, from http://www.apa.org/ed/governance/bea/learner-centered.pdf

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2001). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The ideal problem solver (2nd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins English Dictionary. (2009). Collins English Dictionary: Complete & unabridged (10th ed.). Glasgow: William Collins Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751611000467

  • GagnĂ©, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. (1994). Problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2). Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256

  • Kahney, H. (1993). Problem solving: Current issues (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kays, E., & Sims, R. (2006). Reinventing and reinvigorating instructional design: A theory for emergent learning. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who’s Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 409–412). Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Cambridge Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (1999). Instructional design for cultural difference: A case study of the indigenous online learning in a tertiary context. In J. Winn (Ed.), Responding to diversity. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). Brisbane, QLD: TALS, QUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, Summer 97(74), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1994). The teaching of thinking and problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2013). How to escape education’s death valley. http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_how_to_escape_education_s_death_valley.html

  • Rogers, P. C., Graham, C. R., & Mayes, C. T. (2007). Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of online instruction cross-culturally. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldrake, R. (2011). The presence of the past: Morphic resonance and the habits of nature. Icon Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (2000). Learners as actors: Strategies for computer-enhanced learning encounters. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Wollongong University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R., & Jones, D. (2003). Where practice informs theory: Reshaping instructional design for academic communities of practice in online teaching and learning. Information Technology, Education and Society, 4(1), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, R., & Sims, R. (2006). Online gaming and online gaming communities: Ten reasons why they matter. In A. Treloar & A. Ellis (Eds.), Making a difference with web technologies. Proceedings of AusWeb06, the Twelfth Australian World Wide Web Conference. Noosa Heads, QLD: Southern Cross University. http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw06/papers/refereed/webb/index.html

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sims, R. (2014). What Is the Design Alchemy Pedagogy ?. In: Design Alchemy. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02423-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics