Abstract
The fact that South Asia and its vehicle for regional integration South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation (SAARC) are on the edge of improvement has been evident for quite some time. For most analysts of the subcontinent, this did not come as a surprise. Compared with other regional organisations it had a very difficult ‘starting position’ (Delinic 2011, 8). South Asia was not able to fully recover from the traumatic partition that followed the end of the European presence. The prevalence of intraregional diplomatic conflicts and fully fledged wars became rampant and prevailed over the logic and rational of effective and cohesive regional co-operation. Nevertheless, the challenge for SAARC exists in a connectivity problem because almost all of the SAARC member states share a border with India, but practically none share a common border, except for the troubled Durand Line between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Furthermore, besides some individual success stories, the region has to contend with endemic poverty, tremendous inequalities, mega-urbanisation, and extra-ordinary challenges when it comes to infrastructure, environmental issues, food and energy security. The most worrying concern is the persistent growth of religious extremism and militant fundamentalism finding its most visible expression in dramatic terrorist attacks and violence against religious and ethnic minorities in South Asia. The numerous domestic and intra-regional conflicts are worsening the situation as well. Addressing these difficulties has always been a great challenge and either suffered from inadequate political will or insufficient capacities or resources to carry out a sustainable integration and cooperation process (cf. Rahman 2004, 140).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahluwalia, I. J. (2009). Economic cooperation in South Asia (pp. 281–355). New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
Ahmad, Q. K. (2002). SAARC: Envisioning the future. South Asian Survey, 9(2), 187–199.
Ahmed, I. (2010). SAARC: Social Charter and human security. In S. D. Muni (Ed.), The emerging dimensions of SAARC. Singapore: Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore.
Baral, L. R. (1999). SAARC: The problem of becoming a community. South Asian Survey, 6(2), 241–257.
Baral, L. R. (2003). Reconstruction of South Asia: A precondition for SAARC. South Asia Survey, 10(1), 71–84.
Brar, B. (2003). SAARC: If functionalism has failed, will realism work? South Asian Survey, 10, 31–41.
Delinić, T. (2011). SAARC – 25 years of regional integration in South Asia. 2/2011, KAS International Reports, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung (pp. 7–21).
Gonsalves, E. (2006). Regional cooperation in South Asia. South Asian Survey, 13(2), 203–209.
Iftekharuzzaman. (2002). Reforming SAARC: In Spite of Governments. In S. Afroze (Ed.), Regional Cooperation in South Asia: New Dimensions and Perspectives (pp. 17–28). Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BISS).
Iqbal, M. J. (2006). SAARC: origin, growth, potential and achievements. Pakistan Journal of History and Culture, XXVII(2), 127–140.
Jain, R. K. (2009). The European Union and Democracy Building in South Asia. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Kadirgamar, L. (1998). South Asia Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century: Opportunities and Challenges. South Asian Survey, 5(1), 27–38.
Majumder, K. (2010, May 28). EU needs to have a strategic relationship with India (Interview with Alexander Stubb, Foreign Minister of Finnland). Tehelka.
Muni, S. D. (1985, April). SARC: Building Regionalism from below, Asian Survey, Vol. 25, No. 4, SARC: Four views and a comparative perspective (pp. 391–404).
Muni, S. D., & Jetly, R. (2010). SAARC prospects: The changing dimensions. In S. D. Muni (Ed.), The emerging dimensions of SAARC (pp. 1–31). Singapore: Institute of South Asian Studies, national University of Singapore.
Naik, N. A. (1999). SAARC – From Association too Community: Prospects and problems. South Asian Survey, 6(2), 333–343.
Nuruzzaman, M. D. (1999). SAARC and subregionalisation co-operation: domestic politics and foreign policies in South Asia. Contemporary South Asia, 8(3), 311–322.
Pattanaik, S. S. (2008). Can SAARC hold the regional dream?, IDSA Comment, 7 Aug 2008.
Pattanaik, S. S. (Ed.). (2011a). South Asia: Envisioning a regional future. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies & Analyses.
Pattanaik, S. S. (2011b). Moving beyond the Rhetoric of cooperation. In S. S. Pattanaik (Ed.), South Asia: Envisioning a regional future. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies & Analyses.
Rahman, A. (2004). SAARC: Not yet a community. In J. Rolfe (Ed.), The Asia-Pacific: A region in transition (pp. 133–148). Honolulu: Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.
SADF/Gallup Europe. (2011). Insights South Asia – Nepal survey 2011. Brussels: South Asia Democratic Forum & Gallup Europe.
SADF/Gallup Europe. (2012). Insights south Asia – Bangladesh survey 2012. Brussels: South Asia Democratic Forum & Gallup Europe.
Wolf, S. O., & Sauerborn, D. (2012). The EU story: Can it offer inspiration for SAARC? The Independent, Dhaka: Bangladesh, Friday, 09 Mar 2012.
Wolf, S. O. (2012a, November 16). From conflict to cooperation? India-Pakistan relations and the shadows of Mumbai. The Independent, Panorama, Dhaka, p. 14.
Wolf, S. O. (2012b, July 27). Is peace possible? Afghan reconciliation between hope and futility. The Independent.
Wolf, S. O. (2012c, August 10). Regional cooperation – A view from Bangladesh. The Independent, Panorama, Dhaka, p. 14.
Wolf, S. O. (2012d, April 20). Trapped in old patterns? The future of Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. The Independent, Friday Features, Dhaka, pp. 25–26.
Wolf, S. O. (2012e, March 30). The Maldives in a stalemate. The Independent, Friday Features, Dhaka, pp. 25–26.
Wolf, S. O. (2013a). The end of technocracy? No room for a ‘Bangladesh Option’ in Pakistan. Spotlight South Asia (Paper No. 7) Foundation for Applied Political Science of South Asia (APSA), Heidelberg.
Wolf, S. O. (2013b, April 1). Civilian control and democratic transition: Pakistan’s unequal equation, Pakistan Security Research Unit (PRSU) (Research Report 2). Durham University, Durham Global Security Institute.
Wolf, S. O. (2013c, March 29). The international context of Bangladesh Liberation War. The Independent, Dhaka.
Wolf, S. O. (2013d). Semblance of civilian control? Military, elections and the latest coup conspiracy in Pakistan. The Independent, Panorama, Dhaka, p. 14.
Wolf, S. O. (2013e, January 4). FATA: Between backwater and black-site?. The Independent, Panorama, Dhaka, p. 14.
Wolf, S. O. (2013f). Regional cooperation – A view from Nepal. FPRC Journal, 13, Focus: India and South Asia, Foreign Policy Research Centre, New Delhi, pp. 218–227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolf, S.O., Casaca, P. (2014). Epilogue: The Merits of Regionalisation and Emerging Prospects in South Asia. In: Wolf, S., Casaca, P., Flanagan, A., Rodrigues, C. (eds) The Merits of Regional Cooperation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02234-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02234-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02233-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02234-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)