Skip to main content

Novel Surgical Approach in the Management of Longitudinal Pathologies Within the Spinal Canal: The Split Laminotomy and “Archbone” Technique: Alternative to Multilevel Laminectomy or Laminotomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Abstract

Multilevel laminectomy to open the spinal canal carries the risk of spinal deformities and instability. With the aim of preserving and reconstructing the posterior structures the authors developed a novel, minimally invasive, multilevel spinous process splitting and distracting laminotomy approach with or without complementary corticocancellous iliac crest or PEEK cage “archbone” grafting. The technique allows exploration of the spinal canal and the removal of intramedullary pathologies. Moderate enlargement of the spinal canal with preservation of the majority of posterior structures is also possible, so that muscle attachments remain intact and postoperative complications are substantially reduced.

This surgical approach, while fulfilling the requirements of previous laminotomy techniques, helps to prevent damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine. In contrast to conventional spinal canal approaches, preservation of the majority of posterior structures is possible, leaving muscle attachments on the spinous processes and laminae completely intact.

Furthermore, the procedure for exposure and decompression of the spinal canal is a suitable method for all spinal segments, the cervical, thoracic, and the lumbar spine in all age groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa M, Imura S, Tomita K (1995) Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study. Int Orthop 19(2):116–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Banczerowski P, Vajda J, Veres R (2008) Exploration and decompression of the spinal canal using split laminotomy and its modification, the “archbone” technique. Neurosurgery 62(5 Suppl 2):ONS432–ONS440, discussion 440–1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bognár L, Madarassy G, Vajda J (2004) Split laminotomy in pediatric neurosurgery. Child Nerv Syst 20:110–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brotchi J (2002) Intrinsic spinal cord tumor removal. Neurosurgery 50:1059–1063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards CC II, Heller JG, Silcox H III (2000) T-saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 25(14):1788–1794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hida S, Naito M, Arimizu J, Morishita Y, Nakamura A (2006) The transverse placement laminoplasty using titanium miniplates for the reconstruction of the laminae in thoracic and lumbar region. Eur Spine J 15(8):1292–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K (1996) Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine 21:1969–1973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hukuda S, Ogata M, Mochizuki T, Shichikawa K (1988) Laminectomy versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:325–326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iida Y, Kataoka O, Sho T, Sumi M, Hirose T, Bessho Y, Kobayashi D (1990) Postoperative lumbar spinal instability occurring or progressing secondary to laminectomy. Spine 15:1186–1189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs RR, McClain O, Neff J (1980) Control of postlaminectomy scar formation. Spine 5:223–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Katsumi Y, Honma T, Nakamura T (1989) Analysis of cervical instability resulting from laminectomies for removal of spinal cord tumour. Spine 14:1171–1176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, Gejo R, Yoshino O (1999) Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 12:392–395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kehrli P, Bergamaschi R, Maitrot D (1996) Open-door laminoplasty in pediatric spinal neurosurgery. Child Nerv Syst 12:551–552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kishan A, Gropper MR (2006) Thoracic laminectomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar L (eds) Atlas of neurosurgical techniques: spine and peripheral nerves. Thieme Inc., New York, pp 448–451

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kishan A, Gropper MR (2006) Thoracic laminotomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar L (eds) Atlas of neurosurgical techniques: spine and peripheral nerves. Thieme Inc., New York, pp 452–455

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koch-Wiewrodt D, Wagner W, Perneczky A (2007) Unilateral multilevel interlaminar fenestration instead of laminectomy or hemilaminectomy: an alternative surgical approach to intraspinal space-occupying lesions. J Neurosurg Spine 6:485–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H (1982) Enlargement of spinal canal by the sagittal splitting of the spinous process (Jpn). Bessatu Seikeigeka 2:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matsui H, Kanamori M, Miaki K (1997) Expansive laminoplasty for lumbar intradural lipoma. Int Orthop 21(3):185–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nolan JP Jr, Sherk HH (1988) Biomechanical evaluation of the extensor musculature of the cervical spine. Spine 13:9–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Papagelopoulos PJ, Peterson HA, Ebersold MJ, Emmanuel PR, Choudhury SN, Quast LM (1997) Spinal column deformity and instability after lumbar or thoracolumbar laminectomy for intraspinal tumors in children and young adults. Spine 22:442–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Papp Z, Vajda J, Veres R, Banczerowski P (2010) Minimal invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of pathologic lesions, situated in the midline of the spinal canal. Biomech Hung 3(1):189–200

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pear BL (1972) Spinal epidural hematoma. Am J Roentgenol 115:155–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Raimondi AJ, Guiterrez FA, Di Rocco C (1976) Laminotomy and total reconstruction of the posterior arch for spinal canal surgery in childhood. J Neurosurg 45:550–560

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shikata J, Yamamuro T, Shimizu K, Saito T (1990) Combined laminoplasty and posterolateral fusion for spinal canal surgery in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 259s:92–99

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shirashi T (2002) A new technique for exposure of the cervical spine laminae. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 96:122–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tandon N, Vollmer DG (2006) Cervical laminectomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar L (eds) Atlas of neurosurgical techniques: spine and peripheral nerves. Thieme Inc., New York, pp 233–238

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tandon N, Vollmer DG (2006) Cervical laminotomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar L (eds) Atlas of neurosurgical techniques: spine and peripheral nerves. Thieme Inc., New York, pp 239–249

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Toribatake Y, Heller JG (1998) Expansive midline T-saw laminoplasty (modified spinous process-splitting) for the management of cervical myelopathy. Spine 23(1):32–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Aalders M, Wiedemayer H, Floerke M, Stoelke D (2004) Reconstruction of the laminar roof with miniplates for a posterior approach in intraspinal surgery: technical considerations and critical evaluation of follow-up results. Spine 29(16):E333–E342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yasuoka S, Peterson HA, MacCarthy CS (1982) Incidence of spinal column deformity after multilevel laminectomy in children and adults. J Neurosurg 57:441–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeh JS, Sgouros S, Walsh AR, Hockley AD (2001) Spinal sagittal malalignment following surgery for primary intramedullary tumours in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 35:318–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, Nakatani N, Ando M, Yamada H, Hayashi N (2002) Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty? Spine 27:1414–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang J, Tsuzuki N, Hirabayashi S, Saiki K, Fujita K (2003) Surgical anatomy of the nerves and muscles in the posterior cervical spine: a guide for avoiding inadvertent nerve injuries during the posterior approach. Spine 28:1379–1384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Banczerowski MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Banczerowski, P., Bognár, L., Rappaport, Z.H., Veres, R., Vajda, J. (2014). Novel Surgical Approach in the Management of Longitudinal Pathologies Within the Spinal Canal: The Split Laminotomy and “Archbone” Technique: Alternative to Multilevel Laminectomy or Laminotomy. In: Schramm, J. (eds) Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol 41. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01830-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01830-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01829-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01830-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics