Abstract
Communicating science in the public policy domain requires navigating the tension between two features of good practice in modern policy making: developing evidence based approaches and inclusive deliberative processes. Results of policy-making processes that have sought to maximize these different perspectives in parallel have been and will continue to be disappointing. Ensuring the “quality” of evidence and of supporting the integration of the different kinds of inputs in the decision-making process requires nimble and astute tension brokers who undertake knowledge brokering, reconcile different ways of knowing, and recognize when reconciliation is not achievable and/or not desirable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(2):216–224
Ball D, Baverstock K (2006) A bad year for science. Nucl Eng Int 51(619):44–47
Baverstock K, Ball D (2005) The UK committee on radioactive waste management. J Radiol Prot 25:313–320
Beierle T, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Bielak A, Campbell A, Pope S, Schaefer K, Shaxson L (2008) From science communications to knowledge brokering: the shift from “science push” to “policy pull”. In: Cheng D, Claessens M, Gascoigne T, Metcalfe J, Schiele B (eds) Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices. Springer, New York
Bochel H, Duncan S (2007a) Making policy in theory and practice. Policy Press, Bristol
Bochel C, Evans A (2007b) Inclusive policy-making. In: Bochel H, Duncan S (eds) Making policy in theory and practice. The Policy Press, Bristol
Bullock H, Mountford J, Stanley R (2001) Better policy-making. Cabinet Office, Centre for Management and Policy Studies, London
Cabinet Office (1999) Professional policy-making for the twenty-first century, Strategic Policy-Making Team. Cabinet Office, London
Campbell A (1997) Facilitating landcare: conceptual and practical dilemmas. In: Lockie S, Vanclay F (eds) Critical landcare, Key Papers Series, Number 6 Centre for Rural Social Research Charles Sturt University. Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga
Clark R (2007) Using research to inform policy: the role of interpretation (Final Report). Retrieved from Environment Research Funders Forum at http://www.erff.org.uk/documents/20070302-interpret-study.pdf
Collier D (2005) CoRWM phase 2 evaluation (Fauklands Associates report, C2022 R06-3), October. Retrieved from CoRWM document 1355 at http://www.corwm.org.uk/pdf%5C1355%20-%20corwm%20phase%202%20evaluation%20statement%20v3.pdf
Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM) (2006) Managing our radioactive wastes safely: CoRWM’s recommendations to Government (CoRWM document 700). Retrieved from http://www.corwm.org.uk/pdf/FullReport.pdf
Council for Science and Technology (2005) Policy through dialogue: informing policies based on science and technology. Council for Science and Technology, London, March
Environment Agency (2007) Corporate Plan 2007–2010: translating strategy into action
European Commission (2002) Communication from the commission on the collection and use of expertise by the commission: principles and guidelines, COM (2002) 713 final
Gavelin K, Wilson R, Doubleday R (2007) Democratic technologies? The final report of the nanotechnology engagement group. Involve, London
Hammersley M (2005) Is the evidence-based practice movement doing more good than harm? Reflections on Iain Chalmers’ case for research-based policy making and practice. Evid Policy 1(1):85–100
HM Government (1999) Modernising government. Presented to Parliament, Cm 4310, March
Hogwood B, Gunn L (1984) Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford University, Oxford
Holmes J (2005) The use of science in environmental policy and regulation: baseline review, Environment Research Funders’ Forum. Retrieved from http://www.erff.org.uk/documents/20050600-baseline-review.pdf
Holmes J, Savgard J (2008) Dissemination and implementation of environmental research, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report 5681, February. Retrieved from http://www.skep-era.net/site/files/WP4_final%20report.pdf
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2007) Scientific advice, risk, and evidence based policy making: government response to the Committee’s seventh report of session, 2005–2006, HC 307, February
House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee (2000) Science and society, Science and Technology Select Committee Session 1999–2000, 3rd report, February
Jasanoff S (1997) Civilization and madness: the great BSE scare of 1996. Public Underst Sci 6:221–232
Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Jones H, Jones N, Shaxson L, Walker D (2012) Knowledge, policy and power in international development: a practical guide. The Policy Press, Bristol
Konig A, Jasanoff S (2002) The credibility of expert advice for regulatory decision-making in the U.S. and EU, Regulatory Policy Program Working Paper RPP-2002-07. Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
MacKerron G (2007) The CoRWM process–lessons learned, CoRWM document 1896.3, May. Retrieved from http://www.corwm.org.uk/pdf/1896%203%20lessons%20learned.pdf
Michaels S (1992) New perspectives on diffusion of earthquake knowledge. Earthq Spectra 8(1):159–175
Michaels S (2005) Addressing landslide hazards: towards a knowledge management perspective. In: Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier M (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, London
Michaels S (2009) Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings. Environ Sci Policy 12(7):994–1011
Office of Science and Technology (2000) Guidelines 2000: scientific advice and policy making. Report by the Chief Scientific Adviser, Office of Science and Technology, Department for Trade and Industry
Office of Science and Technology (2001) Scientific advice and policy making. Report by the Chief Scientific Adviser, Department of Trade and Industry
Office of Science and Technology (2005) Guidelines on scientific analysis in policy making, October
Office of Science and Technology (2010) The government chief scientific adviser’s guidelines on the use of science and engineering advice in policymaking. Report by the Chief Scientific Adviser, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Pielke R (2007) The honest broker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Royal Society (2006) The long-term management of radioactive waste: the work of the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM), January 6. Retrieved from Royal Society Policy Document http://royalsociety.org/displaypagedoc.asp?id=18773
Scott A, Holmes J, Steyn G, Wickham S, Murlis J (2005) Science meets policy in Europe. Defra, London
Scott A, Holmes J, Steyn G, Wickham S, Murlis J (2006) Science meets policy 2005: next steps for an effective science-policy interface. Defra, London
Shaxson L (2008) Who’s sitting on Dali’s sofa? Evidence-based policy-making, A PMPA/National School of Government practitioner exchange report. Public Management and Policy Association (PMPA), London
Shaxson, L (2009) Structuring policy problems for plastics, the environment and human health: reflections from the UK. Philos Trans R Soc (B): Theme Issue on plastics, the environment and human health 364(1526):2141–2151
Shaxson L, Bielak A, Ahmed I, Brien D, Conant B, Fisher C, …, Phipps D (2012) Expanding our understanding of K*(KT, KE, KTT, KMb, KB, KM, etc.). A concept paper emerging from the K* conference held in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. UNU-INWEH, Hamilton. 30 pp + appendices, April
Stirling A (2005) Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement (claiming citizenship). Zed, London
US Environmental Protection Agency (2006) 2006–2011 EPA strategic plan: charting our course. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/plan/2006/entire_report.pdf
Wiener A, Rogers M (2002) Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe. J Risk Res 5(4):317–349
Acknowledgments
We wish to acknowledge the support of Environment Canada, the Canadian Water Network, and the Canada Foundation for Innovation for sponsoring the invitational workshop on brokering knowledge for the environment, Sept. 17–20, 2007, L’Auberge du lac à la loutre, Huberdeau, Québec. Thanks go to the other workshop participants and in particular to Shealagh Pope, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, formerly with Environment Canada for her insightful comments on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michaels, S., Holmes, J., Shaxson, L. (2014). Science Communication and the Tension Between Evidence-Based and Inclusive Features of Policy Making. In: Drake, J., Kontar, Y., Rife, G. (eds) New Trends in Earth-Science Outreach and Engagement. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01821-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01821-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01820-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01821-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)