Skip to main content

Dynamic Coordination of Multiple Agents in a Class of Differential Games Through a Generalized Linear Reward Scheme

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Models and Methods in Economics and Management Science

Abstract

We consider a wide class of dynamic problems characterized by multiple, non-cooperative agents operating under a general control rule. Since each agent follows its own objective function and these functions are interdependent, control efforts made by each agent may affect the performance of the other agents and thus affect the overall performance of the system. We show that recently developed dynamic linear reward/penalty schemes can be generalized to provide coordination of the multiple agents in a broad-spectrum dynamic environment. When the reward scheme is applied, the agents are induced to choose the system-wide optimal solution even though they operate in a decentralized decision-making environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avi-Itzhak, B., Golany, B., & Rothblum, U. G. (2006). Strategic equilibrium vs. global optimum for a pair of competing servers. Journal Applied Probability, 43, 1165–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Başar, T., & Olsder, G. L. (1982). Dynamic noncooperative game theory. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M., McGuire, C. B., & Winsten, C. B. (1956). Studies in the economics of transportation. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P., (1999). Competitive supply chain inventory management, In S. Tayur, R. Ganesham & M. Magazine (Eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. Kluwer International Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P., (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts.In S. Graves, T. de Kok (Eds.), The Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R., Dodis, Y., & Roughgarden T., (2003). Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users, Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory Computing (STOC), pp. 521–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, R. J. (1978). Incentives and mechanisms for priority queuing problems, Bell J. Economics, 9, 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golany, B., Kogan, K., & Rothblum, U. G. (2011). A generalized two-agent location problem: Asymmetric dynamics and coordination. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications ( JOTA), 148(2), 336–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golany, B., & Rothblum, U. G. (2006). Inducing coordination in supply chains through linear reward schemes. Naval Research Logist, 53(1), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, K., & Tapiero, C. S. (2007). Supply chain games: operations management and risk valuation. Boston: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, K., & Tapiero, C. (2008). Vertical pricing competition in supply chains: the effect of production experience and coordination. International Transactions in Operational Research, 15(4), 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, K., & Tapiero, C. (2009). Optimal co-investment in supply chain infrastructure. European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan K., & Tapiero, C. (2011). Coordination of Co-Investments in Supply Chain Infrastructure. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, accepted at 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, H., & Whang, S. (1990). Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue. Operations Research, 38(5), 870–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson, C. L., Hu, J., & Rosenblatt, M. J. (2003). Teaching the costs of uncoordinated supply chains. Interfaces, 33(3), 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naor, P. (1969). The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica, 37, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shima, T., Rasmussen, S. J., Sparks, A. G., & Passino, K. M. (2006). Multiple task assignments for cooperating uninhabited aerial vehicles using genetic algorithms. Computers Operation Research, 33, 3252–3269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. A. (2002). Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Management Science, 48(8), 992–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantin Kogan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Golany, B., Kogan, K., S. Tapiero, C. (2014). Dynamic Coordination of Multiple Agents in a Class of Differential Games Through a Generalized Linear Reward Scheme. In: El Ouardighi, F., Kogan, K. (eds) Models and Methods in Economics and Management Science. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 198. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00669-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics