Abstract
Here we elaborate upon the recent hypothesis that the sensory systems of insects are matched to their flight dynamics, such that they are configured to make or encode measurements within a modal coordinate system. This hypothesis is inspired by several distinctive organizational principles of insect sensory systems: namely, that insects appear to be configured a) to sense relative, rather than absolute, quantities; b) to make measurements in highly non-orthogonal axis systems; and c) to fuse sensory inputs from different modalities prior to using them as feedback to the actuators. Having elaborated upon the hypothesis itself and considered the functional advantages of the resulting control architecture, we discuss some of the physiological details of how the requisite coordinate systems might in practice be set up in the fly visual system. We also provide a mathematical framework for testing the quantitative match between sensory system and flight dynamics in the specific context of the visual systems of flies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1989) Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci 12: 297–306
Borst A, Egelhaaf M, Haag J (1995) Mechanisms of dendritic integration underlying gain control in fly motion-sensitive interneurons. J Comput Neurosci 2: 5–1837
Borst A, Haag J (2002) Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly. J Comp Physiol A 188: 419–437
Buchner E (1984) Behavioural analysis of spatial vision in insects. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 561–621
Dahmen H, Franz M, Krapp HG (2001) Extracting ego-motion from optic flow: limits of accuracy and neuronal filters. In: Zanker JM, Zeil J (eds) Processing visual motion in the real world — A survey of computational, neural and ecological constraints. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 143–168
Egelhaaf M, Borst A (1993) Movement detection in arthropods. Rev Oculomot Res 5: 53–77
Egelhaaf M, Kern R, Krapp HG, Kretzberg J, Kurtz R, Warzecha A-K (2002) Neuronal encoding of behaviourally relevant visual-motion information in the fly. Trends Neurosci 25: 94–100
Faruque I, Humbert JS (2010). Dipteran insect flight dynamics: Part 1: Longitudinal motions about hover. J Theo Biol 264: 538–552
Faruque I, Humbert JS (2010). Dipteran insect flight dynamics: Part 2: Lateral-directional motions about hover. J Theo Biol 265: 306–313
Franz MO, Krapp HG (2000) Wide-field, motionsensitive neurons and optimal matched filters for optic flow. Biol Cybern 83: 185–197
Franz MO, Chahl JS, Krapp HG (2004) Insect inspired estimation of self-motion. Neural Comput 16: 2245–2260
Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Goodman L (1981) Organisation and physiology of the insect dorsal ocellar system. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, Volume VII/6 C, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 201–181
Haag J, Borst A (2001) Recurrent network interactions underlying flow-field selectivity of visual interneurons. J Neuosci 21: 5685–5692
Haag J, Borst A (2004) Neural mechanism underlying complex receptive field properties of motion-sensitive interneurons. Nat Neurosci 7: 628–634
Haag J, Wertz A, Borst A (2007) Integration of lobula plate output signals by DNOVS1, an identified premotor descending neuron. J Neurosci 27: 1992–2000
Hardie RC (1986) The photoreceptor array of the dipteran retina. Trends Neurosci 9: 419–423
Harris RA, O’Carroll DC, Laughlin SB (2000) Contrast gain reduction in fly motion adaptation. Neuron 28: 595–606
Hausen K (1982) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly I. The horizontal cells — structure and signals. Biol Cybern 45: 143–156
Hausen K (1993) Decoding of retinal image flow in insects. Rev Oculomot Res 5: 203–235
Heide G (1983). Neural mechanism of flight control in Diptera. In: Nachtigall W (ed) BIONA report, Vol. 2, Akad Wiss Mainz, Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, New York, pp. 35–52
Hengstenberg R (1982) Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of the blowfly Calliphora. J Comp Physiol A 149: 179–193
Hengstenberg R (1991) Gaze control in the blowfly Calliphora: A multisensory two-stage integration process. The Neurosciences 3: 19–29
Hengstenberg R (1993) Multisensory control in insect oculomotor systems. Rev Oculomot Res 5: 285–298
Huston SJ, Krapp HG (2008) Visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system. PLoS Biol 6: 1468–1478
Huston SJ, Krapp HG (2009) Non-linear integration of visual and haltere inputs in fly neck motor neurons. J Neurosci 29: 13 097–13 105
Karmeier K, Tabor R, Egelhaaf M, Krapp HG (2001) Early visual experience and the receptive field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly motion pathway. Vis Neurosci 18: 1–8
Karmeier K, Krapp HG, Egelhaaf M (2003) Robustness of the tuning of fly visual interneurons to rotatory optic flow. J Neurophysiol 90: 1626–1634
Karmeier K, Krapp HG, Egelhaaf M (2005) Population coding of self-motion: applying Bayesian analysis to a population of visual interneurons in the fly. J Neurophysiol 94: 2182–2194
Karmeier K, van Hateren JH, Kern R, Egelhaaf M (2006) Encoding of naturalistic optic flow by a population of blowfly motion-sensitive neurons. J Neurophysiol 96: 1602–1614
Koenderink J, van Doorn A (1987) Facts on optic flow. Biol Cybern 56: 247–254
Krapp HG, Hengstenberg R (1996) Estimation of self-motion by optic flow processing in single visual interneurons. Nature 384: 447–468
Krapp HG, Hengstenberg B, Henstenberg R (1998) Dendritic structure and receptive-field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly. J Neurophysiol 79: 1902–1917
Krapp HG (2000) Neuronal matched filters for optic flow processing in flying insects. Int Rev Neurobiol 44: 93–120
Krapp HG, Hengstenberg R, Egelhaaf M (2001) Binocular input organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly visual system. J Neurophysiol 85: 724–734
Krapp HG, Wicklein M (2008) Central processing of visual information in insects. In: Basbaum AI, Kaneko A, Shepherd GM, Westheimer G. (eds) The senses: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 1, Vision I, Masland R, Albright TD (eds) Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 131–204
Lindemann JP, Kern R, van Hateren JH, Ritter H, Egelhaaf M (2005) On the computations analyzing natural optic flow: quantitative model analysis of the blowfly motion vision pathway. J Neurosci 25: 6435–6448
Longden KD, Krapp HG (2009) State-dependent receptive field properties of optic flow processing interneurons. J Neurophysiol 102: 3606–3618
Nalbach G (1994) Extremely non-orthogonal axes in a sense organ for rotation: behavioural analysis of the dipteran haltere system. Neurosci 61: 155–163
Parsons MM, Krapp HG, Laughlin SB (2006) A motion-sensitive neurone responds to signals from the two visual systems of the blowfly, the compound eyes and ocelli. J Exp Biol 209: 4464–4474
Parsons MM, Krapp HG, Laughlin SB (2010) Sensor fusion in identified visual interneurons. Curr Biol 20: 624–628
Petrowitz R, Dahmen H, Egelhaaf M, Krapp HG (2000) Arrangement of optical axes and the spatial resolution in the compound eye of the female blowfly. J Comp Physiol A 186: 737–746
Reichardt W (1961) Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In: Rosenblith WA (ed) Principles of sensory communications. Wiley, New York, pp. 303–317
Schuling FH, Mastebroek HAK, Bult R, Lenting BPM (1989) Properties of elementary movement detectors in the fly Calliphora erythrocephala. J Comp Physiol A 165: 179–192
Simmons PJ, Jian S, Rind FC (1993) Responses in vivo to light signals by large, 2nd-order ocellar neurons of the blowfly, Calliphora erythrocephala. J Physiol Lond 473: 244–244
Srinivasan MV, Zhang S, Chahl JS (2001) Landing strategies in honeybees, and possible applications to autonomous airborne vehicles. Biol Bull, 200: 216–221
Stevens BL, Lewis FL (2003) Aircraft control and simulation, 2nd edn. Hoboken, Wiley, New York
Tarokh M (1992) Measures of controllability, observability, and fixed modes. IEEE Trans Autom Control 37: 1268–1273
Taylor GK, Thomas ALR (2003) Dynamic flight stability in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. J Exp Biol 206: 2803–2829
Taylor GK, Krapp HG (2007) Sensory systems and flight stability: What do insects measure and why? Adv Insect Physiol 34: 231–316
Wertz A, Gaub B, Plett J, Haag J, Borst A (2009) Robust coding of ego-motion in descending neurons of the fly. J Neurosci 29: 14993–15000
White JA, Rubenstein JT, Kay AR (2000) Channel noise in neurons. Trends Neurosci 23: 131
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krapp, H.G., Taylor, G.K., Humbert, J.S. (2012). The mode-sensing hypothesis: Matching sensors, actuators and flight dynamics. In: Frontiers in Sensing. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99749-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99749-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-99748-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-99749-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)