Skip to main content

Chaos and Self-Similarity

  • Chapter
Algorithmic Composition
  • 2651 Accesses

Abstract

Chaos theory became extremely popular in the 1980s due to a wide adoption of some aspects in the works of Edward N. Lorenz1 and Benoit Mandelbrot2 — the socalled “butterfly effect,” self-similarity or the graphically fascinating illustrations of different fractals became the subjects of a broad non-scientific discussion as well. Regardless of whether the shape of coastlines, the branches of blood vessels or the complex behavior of dynamic systems are represented, chaos theory is occasionally given the significance of a “deus ex machina” — a universal explanation model for complex “natural” structures and processes. The euphoria for this discipline is also reflected by the title of James Gleick’s book “Chaos: Making a New Science,” [6] where the author predicted a paradigm shift in physics evoked by chaos theory.

American meteorologist (1917–2008).

French mathematician of Polish origin, born 1924.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bidlack R (1992) Chaotic systems as simple (but complex) compositional algorithms. Computer Music Journal, 16/3, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolognesi T (1983) Automatic composition: experiments with self-similar music. Computer Music Journal, 7/1, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dodge C (1988) Profile: a musical fractal. Computer Music Journal, 12/3, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dodge C, Jerse TA (1997) Computer music: synthesis, composition, and performance, 2nd edn. Schirmer Books, New York. ISBN 0-02-864682-7

    Google Scholar 

  5. DuBois RL (2003) Applications of generative string-substitution systems in computer music. Dissertation. Columbia University, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gleick J (1987) Chaos: making a new science. Penguin Books, New York. ISBN 0-14-00 9250-1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gogins M (1991) Iterated function systems music. Computer Music Journal, 15/1, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hogeweg P, Hesper B (1974) A model study on biomorphological description. Pattern Recognition, 6, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lang B (1996) Diminuendo. Über selbstähnliche Verkleinerungen. In: Beiträge zur Elektronischen Musik, 7. Institut für Elektronische Musik (IEM) an der Universität für Musik und darstellende Kunst in Graz, Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leach, J, Fitch J (1995) Nature, music, and algorithmic composition. Computer Music Journal, 19/2, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lindenmayer A (1968) Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 18, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mandelbrot B, Van Ness J (1968) Fractional brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Review, 10/4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mandelbrot B (1981) Scalebound or scaling shapes: A useful distinction in the visual arts and in the natural sciences. Leonardo, 14, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mandelbrot B (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. ISBN 0-7167-1168-9

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mech R (2004) CPFG Version 4.0 User’s Manual based on the CPFG Version 2.7 User’s Manual by Mark James, Mark Hammel, Jim Hanan, Radomir Mech, Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz with contributions by Radoslaw Karwowski.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCormack J (1996) Grammar based music composition. In: Stocker R, Jelinek H, Durnota B, Bossomaier T (eds) (1996) Complex systems 96: From local interactions to global phenomena. ISO Press, Amsterdam. ISBN 9-05-199284-X

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peitgen HO, Richter PH (2001) The beauty of fractals. Images of complex dynamical systems. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3540158516

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poincaré H (1952) Science and method. Dover Publications, New York. ISBN 10 0486602214

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pressing J (1988) Nonlinear maps as generators of musical design. Computer Music Journal, 12/2, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prusinkiewicz P (1986) Score generation with L-systems. In: Proceedings of the 1986 International Computer Music Conference. International Computer Music Association, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prusinkiewicz P, Lindenmayer A (1990) The algorithmic beauty of plants (The Virtual Laboratory). Springer, New York. ASIN 0387972978

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prusinkiewicz P (2004) Algorithmic Botany. http://algorithmicbotany.org/Cited 8 Nov 2004

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith AR (1984) Plants, fractals, and formal languages. Computer Graphics, 18, 3 July, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  24. Supper M (2001) A few remarks on algorithmic composition. Computer Music Journal 25/1, pages 48–53, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  25. Voss RF, Clarke J (1978) “1/f noise” in music: Music from 1/f noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63/1, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yorke JA, Li TY (1975) Period three implies chaos. The American Mathematical Monthly, 82/10, 1975

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Chaos and Self-Similarity. In: Algorithmic Composition. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-75540-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics