Skip to main content

The European Union’s External Relations after the Lisbon Treaty

  • Chapter
Book cover The Lisbon Treaty

Abstract

The aspirations with regard to the Lisbon Treaty in the above-mentioned excerpt from the ‘Declaration on Globalisation’ which the European Council adopted on 14 December 2007 seem to be modest when compared to what was expected from the European Union (the ‘Union’ or ‘EU’) as an external actor in the run-up to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (the ‘Constitution’). Indeed, the Laeken Declaration envisaged developing “the Union into a stabilizing force and a model in the new, multipolar world”.2 Six years later, after the failure of the ratification of the Constitution, the role of the Lisbon Treaty (with regard to external relations) appears only to be to “bring increased consistency to [the] external action [of the Union]”.

Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union, annexed to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council summit, 14–15 December 2001, section II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • David Allen (2004), So who will speak for Europe? The Constitutional Treaty and coherence in the EU external relations, in: CFSP Forum 2 (2004), No. 5, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sven Biscop (2008), Permanent Structured Cooperation and the future of ESDP (= Egmont Paper 20), Brussels (Academia Press) 2008 (available at: http://www.irri-kiib.be/paperegm/ep20.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (2006), Some Reflections on the CFSP Legal Order, in: Common Market Law Review 43 (2006), 337–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbara Brandtner / Alan Rosas (1998), Human Rights and the External Relations of the European Community: An Analysis of Doctrine and Practice, in: European Journal of International Law 9 (1998), 468–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ian Brownlie (2003), Principles of Public International Law, Oxford (Oxford University Press) 62003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gráinne de Búrca (2008), Reflections on the path from the Constitutional Treaty to the Lisbon Treaty, (= Jean Monnet Working Paper 03/08), New York / NY 2008 (available at http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/08/080301.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzo Cannizzaro (2002), The Scope of EU Foreign Power: Is the EC Competent to Conclude Agreements with Third States including Human Rights Clauses?, in: Enzo Cannizzaro (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations, The Hague (Kluwer) 2002, 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPS, EGMONT and EPC (2007), Joint Study, The Treaty of Lisbon: Implementing the institutional innovations, Brussels, November 2007 (available at: http://shop.ceps.be/downfree.php?item_id=1554).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier Corten / Pierre Klein (eds.) (2006), Les conventions de Vienne sur le droit des traités, Brussels (Bruylant) 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Market Law Review (2005), Editorial Comments: The CFSP under the EU Constitutional Treaty — Issues of depillarization’, in: Common Market Law Review 42 (2005), No. 2, 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tim Corthaut (2005), An Effective Remedy for All? Paradoxes and Controversies in Respect of Judicial Protection in the Field of CFSP under the European Constitution, in: Tilburg Foreign Law Review 12 (2005), 110–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tim Corthaut (2008), Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? A comparison with the Constitutional Treaty, in: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 15 (2008), 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Per Cramér (2005), Does the Codification of the Principle of Supremacy Matter?, in: Giulia Amato / Hervé Bribosia / Bruno de Witte (eds.), Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies (Cambridge University Press) 2005, 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marise Cremona (1996), Human Rights and Democracy Clauses in the EC’s Trade Agreements, in: David O’Keeffe / Nicholas Emiliou (eds.), The European Union and World Trade Law: After the Uruguay Round, Chichester (Wiley) 1996, 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marise Cremona (2001), A Policy of Bits and Pieces? The Common Commercial Policy after Nice, in: Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 2001, 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marise Cremona (2003), The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action, in: Common Market Law Review 40 (2003), 1347–1366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marise Cremona (2004), The Union as a global actor: roles, models and identity, in: Common Market Law Review 41 (2004), 553–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marise Cremona (2007), The Union’s External Action: Constitutional Perspectives, in: Giulio Amato / Hervé Bribosia / Bruno de Witte (eds.), Genesis and Destiny of the European Constitution, Brussels (Bruylant) 2007, 1173–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sophie Dagand (2008), The impact of the Lisbon Treaty on CFSP and ESDP, (= European Security Review 37), Brussels, March 2008 (available at: http://www.isis-europe.org/pdf/2008 _artrel_150_esr37tol-mar08.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan Dashwood (2005), The EU Constitution — What Will Really Change?, in: Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 2005, 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo Diedrichs (2003), The Provisions on ESDP in the Constitutional Treaty: No revolution in Military Affairs, in: CFSP Forum 1 (2003), No. 1, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo Diedrichs (2004), Flexibility in ESDP: From the Convention to the IGC and Beyond, in: CFSP Forum 2 (2004), No. 5, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon Duke (2004), The European External Action Service: a Diplomatic Service in the Making?, in: CFSP Forum 2 (2004), No. 4, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R. Eaton (1994), Common Foreign and Security Policy, in: David O’Keeffe / Patrick M. Twomey (eds.), Legal issues of the Maastricht Treaty, London (Chancery) 1994, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piet Eeckhout (2004), External Relations of the European Union — Legal and Constitutional Foundations, Oxford (Oxford University Press) 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piet Eeckhout (2005), Does Europe’s Constitution Stop at the Water’ s Edge? Law and Policy of the EU’ s External Relations, Groningen (Europa Law Publishing) 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Policy Centre (ed.) (2007), The EU Foreign Service: how to build a more effective common policy (= EPC Working Paper No. 28), Brussels, November 2007 (available at http://www.epc.eu/).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgio Gaja (1983), The European Community’ s Rights and Obligations under Mixed Agreements, in: David O’ Keeffe / Henry G. Schermers (eds.), Mixed Agreements, Deventer (Kluwer) 1983, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelika Hable (2005), The European Constitution: Changes in the Reform of Competences with a Particular Focus on the External Dimension (= Europainstitut Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Working Paper No 67), Vienna, March 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevor Hartley (2001), International Law and the Law of the European Union — A Reassessment, in: British Yearbook of International Law 72 (2001), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher Hill (2003), A Foreign Minister without a Foreign Ministry — or with too many?, in: CFSP Forum 1 (2003), No. 1, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa T. Karayigit (2006), Why and to What Extent a Common Interpretative Position for Mixed Agreements?, in: European Foreign Affairs Review 11 (2006), 445–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus Krajewski (2005), External Trade Law and the Constitution Treaty: Towards a Federal and More Democratic Common Commercial Policy?, in: Common Market Law Review 42 (2005), 91–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian Kurpas (2007), The Treaty of Lisbon — How much ‘Constitution’ is left? — an overview of the main challenges (= CEPS Policy Brief 147), Brussels, December 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaos Lavranos (2007), UN Sanctions and Judicial Review, in: Nordic Journal of International Law 76 (2007), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koen Lenaerts (2004), Structuurelementen van de Unie volgens de Grondwet voor Europa, in: Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving (2004), 400–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen Lenaerts / Piet van Nuffel, Constitutional Law of the European Union, London (Sweet & Maxwell), 22005.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Mackie / Heather Baser / Jonas Frederikson / Oliver Hasse (2003), Ensuring that Development Cooperation Matters in the New Europe, Brussels (European Centre for Development Policy Management) 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio Missiroli (2007), Introduction: A tale of two pillars — and an arch, in: ‘The EU Foreign Service: how to build a more effective common policy (= EPC Working Paper 28), Brussels, November 2007, 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esa Paasivirta / Alan Rosas (2002), Sanctions, Countermeasures and Related Actions in the External Relations of the EU: A Search for Legal Framework, in: Enzo Cannizzaro (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations, The Hague (Kluwer) 2002, 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo Passos / Stephan Marquardt (2007), International Agreements — Competences, Procedures and Judicial Control, in: Giulio Amato / Hervé Bribosia / Bruno de Witte (eds.), Genesis and Destiny of the European Constitution, Brussels (Bruylant) 2007, 875–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steve Peers (2007), Salvation Outside the Church: Judicial Protection in the Third Pillar after the Pupino and Segi Judgements, in: Common Market Law Review 44 (2007), 894–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard Quille (2008), The Lisbon Treaty and its implications for CFSP / ESDP (= Briefing Paper Directorate General External Policies of the Union), Brussels, February 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laura Rayner (2005), The EU Foreign Ministry and Union Embassies, London (The Foreign Policy Centre) June 2005 (available at: http://fpc.org.uk/fsblob/499.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean de Ruyt (2005), A Minister for a European Foreign Policy (= Robert Schuman Centre, Policy Paper No. 05/03), San Domenico 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eva Steinberger (2006), The WTO Treaty as a Mixed Agreement: Problems with the EC’s and the EC Member States’ Membership of the WTO, in: European Journal of International Law 17 (2006), 837–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom (2008a), House of Commons, Foreign Affairs Committee, Foreign Policy Aspects of the Lisbon Treaty (Third Report of Session 2007–08) London, January 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom (2008b), House of Commons, Defence Committee, The Future of NATO and European Defence (Ninth Report of Session 2007–08) London, March 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang Wessels (2004), A saut constitutionnel out of an intergovernmental trap? The provisions of the Constitutional Treaty for the Common Foreign, Security and Defence policy, in: Joseph H. H. Weiler / Christopher L. Eisgruber (eds.), Altneuland: The EU Constitution in a Contextual Perspective (= Jean Monnet Working Paper 5/04), New York, November 2004 (available at: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/04/040501-17.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan Wouters (2002), De Europese Unie als internationale actor na het Verdrag van Nice, in: Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Europees Recht 2002, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan Wouters (2004), The Union Minister for Foreign Affairs: Europe’s Single Voice or Trojan Horse?, in: Jaap W. de Zwaan / Jan H. Jans / Frans A. Nelissen (eds.), The European Union. An Ongoing Process of Integration. Liber Amicorum Alfred E. Kellermann, The Hague (T.M.C. Asser Press) 2004, 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan Wouters / André Nollkaemper / Erika de Wet (eds.) (2008), The Europeanisation of International Law. The Status of International Law in the EU and Member States, The Hague (T.M.C. Asser Press) 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wouters, J., Coppens, D., De Meester, B. (2008). The European Union’s External Relations after the Lisbon Treaty. In: Griller, S., Ziller, J. (eds) The Lisbon Treaty. Schriftenreihe der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Europaforschung (ECSA Austria) / European Community Studies Association of Austria Publication Series, vol 11. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-09429-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics