Abstract
We have imaged earthquake source zones beneath the northeast India region by seismic tomography, fractal dimension and b value mapping. 3D P-wave velocity (Vp) structure is imaged by the Local Earthquake Tomography (LET) method. High precision P-wave (3,494) and S-wave (3,064) travel times of 980 selected earthquakes, m d ≥ 2.5, are used. The events were recorded by 77 temporary/permanent seismic stations in the region during 1993–1999. By the LET method simultaneous inversion is made for precise location of the events as well as for 3D seismic imaging of the velocity structure. Fractal dimension and seismic b value has been estimated using the 980 LET relocated epicenters. A prominent northwest-southeast low Vp structure is imaged between the Shillong Plateau and Mikir hills; that reflects the Kopili fault. At the fault end, a high-Vp structure is imaged at a depth of 40 km; this is inferred to be the source zone for high seismic activity along this fault. A similar high Vp seismic source zone is imaged beneath the Shillong Plateau at 30 km depth. Both of the source zones have high fractal dimension, from 1.80 to 1.90, indicating that most of the earthquake associated fractures are approaching a 2D space. The spatial fractal dimension variation map has revealed the seismogenic structures and the crustal heterogeneities in the region. The seismic b value in northeast India is found to vary from 0.6 to 1.0. Higher b value contours are obtained along the Kopili fault (∼1.0), and in the Shillong Plateau (∼0.9) The correlation coefficient between the fractal dimension and b value is found to be 0.79, indicating that the correlation is positive and significant. To the south of Shillong Plateau, a low Vp structure is interpreted as thick (∼20 km) sediments in the Bengal basin, with almost no seismic activity in the basin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aki, K. (1965), Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a − b M and its confidence limits, Bull Earthquake Res Inst Tokyo Univ 43, 237–239.
Bender, B. (1983), Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped data, Bull Seism Soc Am 73, 831–851.
Bhattacharya, P. M., Majumdar, R. K., and Kayal, J. R. (2002), Fractal dimension and b-value mapping in northeast India, Curr Sci 82(12), 1486–1491.
Bhattacharya, P. M., Mukhopadhyay, S., Majumdar, R. K., and Kayal J. R. (2008), 3D seismic structure of the northeast India region and its implications for local and regional tectonics, J Asian Earth Sci 33, 25–41.
Bilham, R. and England, P. (2001), Plateau ‘pop-up’ in the great 1897 Assam earthquake, Nature 410, 806–809.
Chen, W. P. and Molnar, P. (1990), Source parameters of earthquakes and intraplate deformation beneath the Shillong Plateau and northern Indo-Burma ranges, J Geophys Res 95, 12,527–12,552.
De Reena, and Kayal, J. R. (1990), Crustal P-wave velocity and velocity-ratio study in northeast India by a microearthquake survey, Pure Appl Geophys 134, 93–108.
Eberhart-Phillips, D. (1986), Three-dimensional velocity structure in northern California coast ranges from inversion of local earthquake arrival times, Bull Seism Soc Am 76, 1025–1052.
Eberhart-Phillips, D., Local earthquake tomography: Earthquake source regions. In Seismic Tomography: Theory and Practice (eds. H. M. Iyer and K. Hirahara) (Chapman and Hall, London, 1993) pp. 613-643.
Ghosh, R.K. and Saha S., Mathematics and Statistics Advanced Level (New Central Book Agency Publishers, India, 2002) 202 pp.
Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I. (1983) Characterisation of strange attractors, Phys Rev Lett 50, 346–349.
Hanksson, E. (1990), Earthquakes, faulting, and stress in the Los Angels basin, J Geophys Res 95(15), 365–394.
Hirata, T. (1989), A correlation between the b value and the fractal dimension of earthquakes, J Geophys Res 94, 7507–7514.
Idziak, A. and Teper, T. (1996), Fractal dimension of faults network in the upper Silesian coal basin Poland: Preliminary studies, Pure Appl Geophys 147, 239–247.
Jones, L. M., Sieh, K. E., Hankson, E., and Hutton, L. K. (1990), The December 3, 1998 Pasadena earthquake: Evidence for strike-slip motion on the Raymond fault, Bull Seism Soc Am 80, 474–482.
Kagan, Y.Y. (2007), Earthquake spatial distribution: The correlation dimension, Geophys J Int 168, 1175–1194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03251.
Kagan, Y.Y. and Knopoff, L. (1980), Spatial distribution of earthquakes: The two-point correlation function, Geophys J R Astron Soc 62, 303–320.
Kayal, J.R. (1996), Earthquake source processes in northeast India: A review, J Him Geol 17, 53–69.
Kayal, J.R. (2001), Microearthquake activity in some parts of the Himalaya and the tectonic model, Tectonophysics 339, 331–351.
Kayal, J. R., Microearthquake Seismology and Seismotectonics of South Asia (Springer, Heidelberg, 2008) 503 pp.
Kayal, J. R. and De, R. (1991), Microseismicity and tectonics in northeast India, Bull Seism Soc Am 81, 131–138.
Kayal, J. R., De, R., and Chakraborty, P. (1993), Microearthquakes at the Main Boundary Thrust in eastern Himalaya and the present day tectonic model, Tectonophysics 218, 375–381.
Kayal, J. R., Arefiev, S.S., Baruah, S., Hazarika, D., Gogoi, N., Kumar, A., Chowdhury, S.N., and Kalita, S. (2006), Shillong Plateau earthquakes in northeast India region: Complex tectonic model, Curr Sci 91(1), 109–114.
Kumar, M.R. and Rao, N.P., (1995), Significant trends related to slab seismicity and tectonics in the Burmese Arc region from Havard CMT solutions, Phys Earth Planet Int 90, 75–80.
Le Dian, A. Y., Tapponnier, P., and Molnar, P. (1984), Active faulting and tectonics of Burma and surrounding regions, J Geophys Res 89, 453–472.
Lee, W. H. K. and Lahr, J.C. (1975), HYPO71 (revised): A computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude and first motion pattern of local earthquakes, US Geol Surv Open file Rep., Vol 75-311, pp 1–116.
Legrand, D. (2002), Fractal dimension of small, intermediate and large earthquakes, Bull Seism Soc Am 92, 3318–3320.
Mitra, S., Preistly, K., Bhattacharya, A. K., and Gaur, V. K. (2005), Crustal structure and earthquake focal depths beneath northeastern India and southern Tibet, Geophys J Int 160, 227–248. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02470.
Nandy, D. R. (1980), Tectonic Pattern in NE India, Ind J Earth Sci 7, 103–107.
Nandy, D. R., Geodynamics of Northeastern India and the Adjoining Region (ACB publication, New Delhi, 2001) 209 pp.
Oldham, R. D. (1899), Report on the great earthquake of the 12th June 1897, Geol Surv India Mem Vol 29, Reprinted, 1981, Geological Survey of India, Calcutta, 379 pp.
Page, R. (1968), Aftershocks and micro-aftershocks, Bull Seism Soc Am 58, 1131–1606.
Pavilis, G. L. and Booker, J.R. (1980), The mixed discrete-continuous inverse problem: Application to simultaneous determination of earthquake hypocenters and velocity structure, J Geophys Res 88, 8226–8236.
Richter, C.F., Elementary Seismology (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1958) 768 pp.
Scholtz, C. H., Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990) 290 pp.
Seeber, L., Armbuster, J.G., and Quittmeyer, R. (1981), Seismicity and continental subduction in the Himalayan Arc. In Zagros, Hindu Kush Himalaya Geodynamic Evolution, Geodyn Ser. (eds. H. K. Gupta and F.M. Delany), 3, 215–242.
Smith, L. A. (1988), Intrinsic limits on dimension calculations, Phys Lett 133, 283–288.
Tandon, A. N. (1954), A study of Assam earthquake of August 1950 and its aftershocks, Indian J Meteorol Geophys 5, 95–137.
Thurber, C. H. (1983), Earthquake location and three dimensional crustal structure in the Coyote Lake area, Central California, J Geophys Res 88,B10, 8226–8236.
Tosi, P. (1998), Seismogenic structure behaviour revealed by spatial clustering of seismicity in the Umbria-Marche region, (Central Italy), Ann. De Geofisica 41(2), 215–224.
Utsu, T. (1965), A method for determining the value of b in a formula log N = a − bM showing the magnitude-frequency relation for earthquakes, Geophys Bull Hokkaido Univ 13, 99–103.
Wyss, M., Sammis, C. G., Nadeau, R.M., and Weimer, S. (2004), Fractal dimension and b value on creeping and locked patches of the San Andreas fault near Parkfield California, Bull Seism Soc Am 94(2), 410–421.
Xu, Y. and Burton, P. (1999), Spatial fractal evolutions and hierarchies for microearthquakes in central Greece, Pure Appl Geophys 154, 73–99.
Zhao, D., Hasegawa, A., and Horiuchi, S. (1992), Tomographic imaging of P and S wave velocity structure beneath northeastern Japan, J Geophys Res 97, 19909–19928.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Birkhäuser / Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhattacharya, P.M., Kayal, J.R., Baruah, S., Arefiev, S.S. (2010). Earthquake Source Zones in Northeast India: Seismic Tomography, Fractal Dimension and b Value Mapping. In: Savage, M.K., Rhoades, D.A., Smith, E.G.C., Gerstenberger, M.C., Vere-Jones, D. (eds) Seismogenesis and Earthquake Forecasting: The Frank Evison Volume II. Pageoph Topical Volumes. Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0500-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0500-7_11
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0346-0499-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-0346-0500-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)