Skip to main content

Rebuilding the Past: 3D Reconstruction and BIM Analysis of a Neolithic House at La Draga (Girona, Spain)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Digital Cultural Heritage

Abstract

The 3D reconstruction and the BIM analysis of the prehistoric house architecture of the Neolithic settlement of la Draga (Girona, Spain) will be illustrated in this paper. La Draga is an Early Neolithic pile-dwelling settlement (ca. 5.300–4.800 cal BC) located in the NE of the Iberian Peninsula, on the eastern shore of Lake Banyoles (Girona, Spain). The excavations revealed that the settlement was one of the earliest open-air Neolithic occupations in NE Iberia, and it is particular for bearing an exceptional conservation and preservation of the archaeological organic remains. The archaeological surveys shown that the area occupied by the settlement was of 8000 m2 ca. (ca. 100 m along the shoreline and ca. 80 m of width inland Tarrus in La Draga (Banyoles, Catalonia), an Early Neolithic Lakeside Village in Mediterranean Eu-rope. Catalan Hist Rev (1):17–33, [1], Bosch et al. in El jacimentneolític lacus-tre de La Draga (Banyoles-Pla de l’Estany). Quaderns de Banyoles, 13, [2]). Of the four sector excavated one is today sub-merged (Sector C) and other two are in the phreatic level (Sector B and D) (Palomo et al. Prehistoric Occupation of Banyoles Lakeshore: Results of Recent Excavations at La Draga Site, Girona, Spain. J Wet Ar-chaeol 4(1):58–73, [3]). This is the reason why perishable material has been recovered, among which a relevant amount of well-preserved wooden artifact, the majority of whom are architectural parts. The presence of these parts and the need to better understand the ancient architecture are the base of this work. To do so we decided to use a new approach, combining 3D reconstruction (using Rhinocer-os 5) and BIM (Building information Modeling) structural analysis. In the prior excavations the wooden elements have been 3D scanned giving us accurate information about shape, geometry and material properties (Li et al. in Coordination between understanding historic buildings and BIM modelling: a 3D-output oriented and typological data capture method. ISPRS, Proc 25th Int CIPA Symp 40:283–288 [4]). In addition to that, all these elements have been accurately georeferenced and based spatial analysis have been taken into account. This two studies combined, allow us distinguish between those wooden parts with a clear, or almost, architectonical function and those parts that, even being part of the house, had no evident structural function. The 3D model created on the base of these data showed that, even though very complete, these data were not enough to re-construct the house and there were many “gaps” to fill because many important architectonic parts have left no traces. A clear example is the roof: even we had identified the parts that composed it, we have no information about the roof covering. In cases like this, to fill these gaps, we have sought help from history, ethnology and anthropology to elaborate solutions suitable with our case taking into account all the information about the ancient Draga (available resources, and technologies known by the human group, the landscape etc.). To analyse the viability of the resulting model, it has been elaborated using a custom-made BIM for modelling prehistoric timber structures: it is based on the use the modern and vernacular architecture definitions and procedures to analyse the functional of different parts. The house, as a complex, forms a unique object but it is formed by several other individual or conglomerated elements. The identification of these elements, through the use of the BIM technique, allowed us to individuate the structural parts of the building and to work with them. Following modern architectural practices, the house has been divided into blocks (base block, elevated block, overhead block, etc.) identifying, for each one, independent or composite elements, linear elements, opening and connection. Each parts of the blocks has been defined with a specific terminology (ridge beam, tie beam etc.) and described in its characteristics. Then, the architectural analysis has been used to determine relations and hierarchies between these elements, in the house as a whole and inside the individual blocks. Starting from the description of these key elements, we added general characteristics to them managing to elaborate a descriptive model suitable for all kind of house. Finally, all the information gathered with the archaeological, ethno-anthropological, architectonical and BIM analysis has been synthesized to create an accurate, even hypothetical, 3D model of one of the ancient house of la Draga.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tarrus, J. “La Draga (Banyoles, Catalonia), an Early Neolithic Lakeside Village in Mediterranean Eu-rope,” Catalan Hist. Rev., no. 1, pp. 17–33 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bosch, A., Buxó, R., Chinchilla, J., Palomo, A., Piqué, R., Saña, M., Tarrús. “El jacimentneolític lacus-tre de La Draga (Banyoles-Pla de l’Estany)”, Quaderns de Banyoles, no. 13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Palomo, R. Piqué, X. Terradas, À. Bosch, R. Buxó, J. Chinchilla, J. Tarrús, “Prehistoric Occupation of Banyoles Lakeshore: Results of Recent Excavations at La Draga Site, Girona, Spain,” J. Wet. Ar-chaeol, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 58–73 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, K., Li, S. J., Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Wu, C. “Coordination between Understanding Historic Buildings and BIM Modelling: A 3D-Output Oriented and typological Data Capture Method,” ISPRS, Proc. 25th Int. CIPA Symp., vol. 40, pp. 283–288 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barceló, J. A. “3D Modeling and Shape Analysis in Archaeology”. In Remondino, F., Campana, S., 2014: 3D Recording and Modelling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage—Theory and Best Practices. Archaeopress BAR Publication Series 2598, 9:15–23 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levy, R. and Dawson, P. Reconstructing a Thule whalebone house using 3D imaging. IEEE MultiMedia, 13(2):78–83 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pramar, V.S. Design Fundamentals in Architecture. Somaiya Publications, New Delhi (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lourenço, P. B. Analysis of historical constructions: from thrust-lines to advanced simulations. Historical constructions, 7–9 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Papadopoulos, C. and Earl, G. P. Structural and lighting models for the Minoan cemetery at Phourni, crete. In Proceedings of the 10th International conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, pp. 57–64. Eurographics Association (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Papadopoulos, C. and Earl, G. Formal three-dimensional computational analyses of archaeological spaces. Spatial analysis and social spaces: interdisciplinary approaches to the interpretation prehistoric and historic built environments (Eds. E. Paliou, U. Lieberwirth, S. Polla). De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 135–165 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ching, F.D.K. Architecture: Form, space, and order. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brughmans, T., Keay, S. and Earl, G. Understanding inter-settlement visibility in Iron Age and Roman Southern Spain with exponential random graph models for visibility networks. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1), 58–143 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barceló, J. A., and Moitinho, V. M. Functional analysis from visual and non-visual data. An artificial intelligence approach. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 12(2):273–321 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Papadopoulos C. and Sakellarakis Y. Virtual windows to the past: reconstructing the ‘ceramics workshop’ at Zominthos, Crete, in Melero J., Cano P. & Revelles J. (ed.) CAA 2010 Proceedings of Computer Applications & Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Pp.47–54. (British Archaeological Reports British series 2949). Oxford: Archaeopress (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kantner, J. and Hobgood, R. Digital technologies and prehistoric landscapes in the American Southwest. BAR International Series, 1151: 117–124 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robertson E.C., Seibert J, Fernandez D, Zender M. Space and Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. UNM Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kantner, J. Implications Of Human Behavioral Ecology For Understandign Complex Human Behavior: Resource Monopolization, Package Size, and Turquoise. Journal of Anthropological Research, 66(2), 231–257 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beacham, R., Denard, H. and Niccolucci, F. An introduction to the London charter. Joint Event CIPA/VAST/EG/EuroMed (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Denard, H. Implementing best practice in cultural heritage visualisation: the London charter. In Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics (pp. 255–268). Springer International Publishing (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Demetrescu, E. Archaeological stratigraphy as a formal language for virtual reconstruction. Theory and practice. Journal of Archaeological Science, 57:42–55 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bosch, A., Chinchilla, J., Tarrús, J. El poblat lacustre neolític de La Draga. Excavacions 1990 a 1998. Girona, Museud’Arqueologia de Catalunya: Centre d’ArqueologiaSubaquàtica de Catalunya. (Monografies del CASC; 2) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bosch, A., Chinchilla, J., Tarrús, J. Elsobjectes de fusta del poblatneolític de La Draga. Excavacions 1995–2005. Girona: Museud’Arqueologia de Catalunya: Centre d’ArqueologiaSubaquàtica de Catalunya. (Monografies del CASC; 6) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bosch, A., Chinchilla, J., Tarrús, J. El poblat lacustre neolíticantic de La Draga. Excavacions 2000 a 2005. Girona: Museud’Arqueologia de Catalunya: Centre d’ArqueologiaSubaquàtica de Catalunya. (Monografies del CASC; 9) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bosch, A., Chinchilla, J., Tarrús, J. Elsobjectes de fusta del poblatneolític de La Draga. Excavacions 1995–2005. Girona: Museud’Arqueologia de Catalunya: Centre d’ArqueologiaSubaquàtica de Catalunya. (Monografies del CASC; 6) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Palomo, A., Piqué, R., Terradas, X., Bosch, À.,Buxó, R., Chinchilla, J., Saña, M., Tarrús, J. Prehistoric occupation of Banyoles lakeshore: results of recent excavations at La Draga site, Girona, Spain. Journal of Wetland Archaeology, 14 1:58–73 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Piqué, R.; Palomo, A.; Terradas, X.; Tarrús, J.; Bosch, A.; Chinchilla, J.; Bodganovic, I.; López, O., Saña, M. Characterizing prehistoric archery: technical and functional analyses of the Neolithic bows from La Draga (NE Iberian Peninsula). Journal of Archaeological Science 55, 166–173 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Palomo, A., Piqué, R., Terradas, X., López, O., Clemente, I., Gibaja, J.F. Woodworking technology in the Early Neolithic site of la Draga (Banyoles, Spain) in Anderson, P.C., Cheval, C., Durand, A. (eds.), An interdisciplinary focus on plant-working tools, Antibes: Éditions APDCA, 383–396. [ISBN 2-904110-53-4] (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. López, O. Processosd’obtenció, transformació i ús de la fusta en l’assentamentneolíticantic de la Draga (5320–4800 cal BC). Ph.D. dissertation, Dep. Archeol. Prehist. Univ. Autònoma de Barcelona (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sabbe, K. Serruys F. Vakwerkstructuuralsalternatievefunderingvoor offshore windturbines, KHBO, Oostende (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Piqué, R., Romero, S., Palomo, A., Tarrús, J., Terradas, X. and Bogdanovic, I. The production and use of cordage at the early Neolithic site of La Draga (Banyoles, Spain). Quaternary International (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pétrequin, P. L’architecture lacustre duNéolithiquemoyen II au Nord-Ouestdes Alpes: lescontraintesdu milieu, de l’organisation sociale et desmodes de faire-valoiragricoles. Bulletin de la Société préhistoriquefrançaise, 367–389 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Calvano, M. and Sacco, M. Dalla Forma Al Bim. Progettare Con I Modelli Informati - From The Form To Bim. Designing With Informed Models. In 3D Modeling&Bim, Empler, T. (Eds.), pp. 362–374. Sapienza University of Rome (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Calvano, M. and Casale, A. Il modello integrato e la conservazione dell’immagine della città. In 17th CIRIAF National Congress (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Campana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barceló, J.A., Calvano, M., Campana, I., Piqué, R., Palomo, A., Bultó, J.O. (2020). Rebuilding the Past: 3D Reconstruction and BIM Analysis of a Neolithic House at La Draga (Girona, Spain). In: Kremers, H. (eds) Digital Cultural Heritage. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15200-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics