Abstract
Once an adequate percutaneous tract is created, the next step is to clear the stone. The fragmentation and extraction strategies should be tailored according to stone (hardness, location, size, and burden) and instrument (chosen size of the Amplatz sheath, diameter of the working channel of the endoscope in use) factors. Such strategies are similar in both prone and supine position, in spite of the fact that the slightly downward inclination of the Amplatz sheath in the supine position favors fragments’ spontaneous evacuation. Various tips and tricks, like the variety of laser settings with their different effects or the vacuum-cleaner effect, are described.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hemal AK, Goel A, Aron M et al (2003) Evaluation of fragmentation with single or multiple pulse setting of Lithoclast for renal calculi during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and its impact on clearance. Urol Int 70:265–268
Nerli RB, Koura AC, Prabha V et al (2008) Use of LMA Stonebreaker as an intracorporeal lithotrite in the management of ureteral calculi. J Endourol 22:641–644
Chew BH, Arsovska O, Lange D et al (2011) The Canadian StoneBreaker trial: a randomized, multicenter trial comparing the LMA StoneBreaker and the Swiss LithoClast(R) during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Endourol 25:1415–1419
Alken P (2010) PNL for staghorn stones. In: Rane AM, Desai M, Keeley FX (eds) Top tips in endourology. Euromed Communications, Passfield, pp 20–24
Clayman RV (2000) Nephroscopy sheath characteristics and intrarenal pressure: human kidney model. J Urol 163:1616
Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Gotz T (2001) Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 40:619–624
Lahme S, Zimmermanns V, Hochmuth A, Janitzki V (2008) Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL? Urologe A 47:563–568
Nagele U, Schilling D, Sievert KD (2008) Management of lower-pole stones of 0.8 to 1.5 cm maximal diameter by the minimally invasive percutaneous approach. J Endourol 22:1851–1853, discussion 7
Hoffman N, Lukasewycz SJ, Canales B et al (2004) Percutaneous renal stone extraction: in vitro study of retrieval devices. J Urol 172:559–561
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag France
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoznek, A., Kimuli, M.N., Scoffone, C.M. (2014). Stone Fragmentation and Extraction. In: Scoffone, C., Hoznek, A., Cracco, C. (eds) Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and ECIRS. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0459-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0459-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0359-3
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0459-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)