Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intérêt de l’imagerie de coupes dans le rétrécissement aortique

  • Conference paper
Book cover Imagerie en coupes du cœur et des vaisseaux

  • 673 Accesses

Résumé

L’imagerie de coupe a vu ses indications croître de manière très importante ses dernières années dans l’évaluation des gros vaisseaux et des artères périphériques, mais également au niveau cardiaque pour l’étude non invasive de l’anatomie coronaire, du myocarde et plus récemment des valves. Nous présentons dans ce chapitre l’apport de l’imagerie de coupe dans l’évaluation du rétrécissement aortique (RAC). Nous n’aborderons pas son rôle dans le remplacement valvulaire aortique par cathétérisme (TAVI).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A, et al. (2006) Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 240: 47–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouvier E, Logeart D, Sablayrolles JL, et al. (2006) Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27: 3033–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ, et al. (2006) Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 1410–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J, et al. (2007) Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189: 197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laissy JP, Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, et al. (2007) Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography. Heart 93: 1121–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, et al. (2007) Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 244: 745–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lembcke A, Kivelitz DE, Borges AC, et al. (2009) Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol 44:7–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, et al. (2004) Évaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 90: 893–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Malyar NM, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J, et al. (2008) Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography. Cardiology 109: 126–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, et al. (2007) Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 26: 1436–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Puymirat E, Chassaing S, Trinquart L, et al. (2010) Hakki’s formula for measurement of aortic valve area by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 106: 249–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P, et al. (2003) Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 108: 2236–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Defrance C, Bollache E, Kachenoura N, et al. (2012) Évaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5: 604–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia J, Marrufo OR, Rodriguez AO, et al. (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14: 23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cueff C, Lepage L, Boutron I, et al. (2009) Usefulness of the right parasternal view and non-imaging continuous-wave Doppler transducer for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in the modern area. Eur J Echocardiogr 10: 420–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D, et al. (2004) Évaluation and clinical implications of Aortic Valve Calcification by Electron Beam Computed Tomography. Circulation 110: 356–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rumberger JA, Brundage BH, Rader DJ, Kondos G (1999) Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. Mayo Clin Proc 74: 243–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, et al. (2011) Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart 97: 721–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, et al. (2003) Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 108: 319–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P (2007) Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 115: 2856–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. (2007) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28: 230–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Stork S, et al. (2009) Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 120: 577–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dweck MR, Joshi S, Murigu T, et al. (2011) Midwall fibrosis is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58: 1271–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Peltier M, Trojette F, Sarano ME, et al. (2003) Relation between cardiovascular risk factors and nonrheumatic severe calcific aortic stenosis among patients with a three-cuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 91: 97–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. (2006) Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 2020–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reant P, Brunot S, Lafitte S, et al. (2006) Predictive Value of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multidetector Computed Tomography to Detect Significant Coronary Stenosis Before Valve Surgery. Am J Cardiol 97: 1506–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de cardiologie, Hôpital Bichat, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018, Paris, France

    D. Messika-Zeitoun

Authors
  1. D. Messika-Zeitoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Messika-Zeitoun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Pôle de radiologie et imagerie médicale, CHU, 30, place Henri-Dunant, BP 69, 63003, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Louis Boyer

  2. Fédération de cardiologie Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris XII, Créteil, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010, Créteil, France

    Pascal Guéret

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this paper

Cite this paper

Messika-Zeitoun, D. (2013). Intérêt de l’imagerie de coupes dans le rétrécissement aortique. In: Boyer, L., Guéret, P. (eds) Imagerie en coupes du cœur et des vaisseaux. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0435-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0435-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0434-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0435-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation