Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Suppurations ano-périnéales d’origine crypto-glandulaire et maladie de Crohn

  • Chapter
Book cover IRM du pelvis de l’homme et de la femme

  • 649 Accesses

Résumé

L’utilisation de l’IRM dans le bilan des suppurations ano-périnéales est relativement récente. En effet, la région ano-périnéale étant superficielle et facile d’accès, son exploration a longtemps été cantonnée à l’examen clinique proctologique, qui est suffisant dans la majorité des situations. Puis cet examen s’est enrichi des techniques d’imagerie [1, 2], tout d’abord l’échographie endo-anale [3–5], qui s’est avérée très utile dans les cas difficiles. L’IRM s’est ensuite imposée [6–8] dans le bilan des suppurations complexes ou posant des problèmes difficiles de prise en charge et tout particulièrement en cas de lésions ano-périnéales de la maladie de Crohn (LAPMC) [9]. Elle a permis en outre de préciser l’anatomie de cette région du fait de sa capacité à imager les parties molles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. de Parades V, Cuenod CA, Thomas C, et al. (2000) L’imagerie dans la maladie de Crohn anopérinéale. Acta Endoscopica 30: 565–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barthet M, Juhan V, Gasmi M, Grimaud JC (2004) Imagerie des lésions ano-périneales de la maladie de Crohn. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28: D52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA, Michielsen PP, Van Maercke YM (1991) Value of transrectal ultrasonography in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 101: 1171–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giovannini M, Ardizzone S (2006) Anorectal ultrasound for neoplastic and inflammatory lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20: 113–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cataldo PA, Senagore A, Luchtefeld MA (1993) Intrarectal ultrasound in the evaluation of perirectal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 554–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boudghène F, Aboun H, Grange JD, et al. (1993) L’imagerie par résonance magnétique dans l’exploration des fistules abdominales et ano-périnéales de la maladie de Crohn. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 17: 168–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH, et al. (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in ano. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 708–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haggett PJ, Moore NR, Shearman JD, et al. (1995) Pelvic and perineal complications of Crohn’s disease: assessment using magnetic resonance imaging. Gut 36: 407–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, et al. (2001) A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology 121: 1064–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuenod CA, de Parades V, Siauve N, et al. (2003) IRM des suppurations ano-perineales. J Radiol 84: 516–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barker PG, Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, et al. (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: technique, interpretation and accuracy. Clin Radiol 49: 7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz DA (2009) Editorial: Imaging and the treatment of Crohn’s perianal fistulas: to see is to believe. Am J Gastroenterol 104: 2987–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Parades V, Zeitoun JD, Dahmani Z, Parnaud E (2010) La fistule anale crypto-glandulaire. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 34: 48–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2003) Pilonidal sinus disease: MR imaging distinction from fistula in ano. Radiology 226: 662–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flint R, Strang J, Bissett I, et al. (2004) Rectal duplication cyst presenting as perianal sepsis: report of two cases and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 2208–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rousset P, Hoeffel C (2007) Tumeurs du rectum: aspects IRM et scanner. J Radiol 88: 1679–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A, et al. (2002) Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet 360: 1661–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapple KS, Spencer JA, Windsor AC, et al. (2000) Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 511–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schaefer O, Lohrmann C, Langer M (2004) Assessment of anal fistulas with high-resolution subtraction MR-fistulography: comparison with surgical findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 19: 91–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hussain SM, Stoker J, Zwamborn AW, et al. (1996) Endoanal MRI of the anal sphincter complex: correlation with cross-sectional anatomy and histology. J Anat 189: 677–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Joyce M, Veniero JC, Kiran RP (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of anal fistula and anorectal sepsis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21: 213–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahni VA, Ahmad R, Burling D (2008) Which method is best for imaging of perianal fistula? Abdom Imaging 33: 26–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR, et al. (1996) Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 200: 475–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stoker J, Hussain SM, van Kempen D, et al. (1996) Endoanal coil in MR imaging of anal fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 360–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. deSouza NM, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts GA, et al. (1998) MRI of fistula-in-ano: a comparison of endoanal coil with external phased array coil techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22: 357–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Maccioni F, Colaiacomo MC, Stasolla A, et al. (2002) Value of MRI performed with phased-array coil in the diagnosis and pre-operative classification of perianal and anal fistulas. Radiol Med 104: 58–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tissot O, Bodnar D, Henry L, et al. (1996) Ano-perineal fistula in MRI. Contribution of T2 weighted sequences. J Radiol 77: 253–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Halligan S, Healy JC, Bartram CI (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: STIR or SPIR? Br J Radiol 71: 141–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hori M, Oto A, Orrin S, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted MRI: a new tool for the diagnosis of fistula in ano. J Magn Reson Imaging 30: 1021–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hussain SM, Stoker J, Lameris JS (1995) Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology 197: 671–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hughes LE (1992) Clinical classification of perianal Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 928–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Szurowska E, Wypych J, Izycka-Swieszewska E (2007) Perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: MRI diagnosis and surgical planning: MRI in fistulazing perianal Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging Mar 3

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hyder SA, Travis SP, Jewell DP, et al. (2006) Fistulating anal Crohn’s disease: results of combined surgical and infliximab treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 49: 1837–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grimaud JC, Munoz-Bongrand N, Siproudhis L, et al. (2010) Fibrin glue is effective healing perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 138: 2275–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Etienney I, Rabahi N, Cuenod CA, et al. (2009) Fibrin glue sealing in the treatment of a recto-urethral fistula in Crohn’s disease: a case report. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 33: 1094–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D, et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 98: 332–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Caprioli F, Losco A, Vigano C, et al. (2006) Computerassisted evaluation of perianal fistula activity by means of anal ultrasound in patients with Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 1551–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ng SC, Plamondon S, Gupta A, et al. (2009) Prospective evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy guided by magnetic resonance imaging for Crohn’s perineal fistulas. Am J Gastroenterol 104: 2973–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tougeron D, Savoye G, Savoye-Collet C, et al. (2009) Predicting factors of fistula healing and clinical remission after infliximab-based combined therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci 54: 1746–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Karmiris K, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. (2011) Long-term monitoring of Infliximab therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease by using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: 130–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hama Y, Makita K, Yamana T, Dodanuki K (2006) Mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from fistula in ano: MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187: 517–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fujimoto H, Ikeda M, Shimofusa R, et al. (2003) Mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from fistula-in-ano: findings on MRI. Eur Radiol 13: 2053–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Devon KM, Brown CJ, Burnstein M, McLeod RS (2009) Cancer of the anus complicating perianal Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 52: 211–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lad SV, Haider MA, Brown CJ, McLeod RS (2007) MRI appearance of perianal carcinoma in Crohn’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 26: 1659–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de radiologie, Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France

    C. A. Cuenod

  2. Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Institut Léopold Bellan, 185, rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France

    V. de Parades

  3. Paris, France

    P. Bauer (Gastro-entérologue, Proctologue)

Authors
  1. C. A. Cuenod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. de Parades
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. A. Cuenod .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cuenod, C.A., de Parades, V., Bauer, P. (2014). Suppurations ano-périnéales d’origine crypto-glandulaire et maladie de Crohn. In: IRM du pelvis de l’homme et de la femme. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0428-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0428-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0428-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation